Cargando…
Mothers after Gestational Diabetes in Australia (MAGDA): A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Postnatal Diabetes Prevention Program
BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an increasingly prevalent risk factor for type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the effectiveness of a group-based lifestyle modification program in mothers with prior GDM within their first postnatal year. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In this study, 573 women wer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4961439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27459502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002092 |
_version_ | 1782444674064056320 |
---|---|
author | O’Reilly, Sharleen L. Dunbar, James A. Versace, Vincent Janus, Edward Best, James D. Carter, Rob Oats, Jeremy J. N. Skinner, Timothy Ackland, Michael Phillips, Paddy A. Ebeling, Peter R. Reynolds, John Shih, Sophy T. F. Hagger, Virginia Coates, Michael Wildey, Carol |
author_facet | O’Reilly, Sharleen L. Dunbar, James A. Versace, Vincent Janus, Edward Best, James D. Carter, Rob Oats, Jeremy J. N. Skinner, Timothy Ackland, Michael Phillips, Paddy A. Ebeling, Peter R. Reynolds, John Shih, Sophy T. F. Hagger, Virginia Coates, Michael Wildey, Carol |
author_sort | O’Reilly, Sharleen L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an increasingly prevalent risk factor for type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the effectiveness of a group-based lifestyle modification program in mothers with prior GDM within their first postnatal year. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In this study, 573 women were randomised to either the intervention (n = 284) or usual care (n = 289). At baseline, 10% had impaired glucose tolerance and 2% impaired fasting glucose. The diabetes prevention intervention comprised one individual session, five group sessions, and two telephone sessions. Primary outcomes were changes in diabetes risk factors (weight, waist circumference, and fasting blood glucose), and secondary outcomes included achievement of lifestyle modification goals and changes in depression score and cardiovascular disease risk factors. The mean changes (intention-to-treat [ITT] analysis) over 12 mo were as follows: −0.23 kg body weight in intervention group (95% CI −0.89, 0.43) compared with +0.72 kg in usual care group (95% CI 0.09, 1.35) (change difference −0.95 kg, 95% CI −1.87, −0.04; group by treatment interaction p = 0.04); −2.24 cm waist measurement in intervention group (95% CI −3.01, −1.42) compared with −1.74 cm in usual care group (95% CI −2.52, −0.96) (change difference −0.50 cm, 95% CI −1.63, 0.63; group by treatment interaction p = 0.389); and +0.18 mmol/l fasting blood glucose in intervention group (95% CI 0.11, 0.24) compared with +0.22 mmol/l in usual care group (95% CI 0.16, 0.29) (change difference −0.05 mmol/l, 95% CI −0.14, 0.05; group by treatment interaction p = 0.331). Only 10% of women attended all sessions, 53% attended one individual and at least one group session, and 34% attended no sessions. Loss to follow-up was 27% and 21% for the intervention and control groups, respectively, primarily due to subsequent pregnancies. Study limitations include low exposure to the full intervention and glucose metabolism profiles being near normal at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Although a 1-kg weight difference has the potential to be significant for reducing diabetes risk, the level of engagement during the first postnatal year was low. Further research is needed to improve engagement, including participant involvement in study design; it is potentially more effective to implement annual diabetes screening until women develop prediabetes before offering an intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000338066 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4961439 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49614392016-08-08 Mothers after Gestational Diabetes in Australia (MAGDA): A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Postnatal Diabetes Prevention Program O’Reilly, Sharleen L. Dunbar, James A. Versace, Vincent Janus, Edward Best, James D. Carter, Rob Oats, Jeremy J. N. Skinner, Timothy Ackland, Michael Phillips, Paddy A. Ebeling, Peter R. Reynolds, John Shih, Sophy T. F. Hagger, Virginia Coates, Michael Wildey, Carol PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an increasingly prevalent risk factor for type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the effectiveness of a group-based lifestyle modification program in mothers with prior GDM within their first postnatal year. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In this study, 573 women were randomised to either the intervention (n = 284) or usual care (n = 289). At baseline, 10% had impaired glucose tolerance and 2% impaired fasting glucose. The diabetes prevention intervention comprised one individual session, five group sessions, and two telephone sessions. Primary outcomes were changes in diabetes risk factors (weight, waist circumference, and fasting blood glucose), and secondary outcomes included achievement of lifestyle modification goals and changes in depression score and cardiovascular disease risk factors. The mean changes (intention-to-treat [ITT] analysis) over 12 mo were as follows: −0.23 kg body weight in intervention group (95% CI −0.89, 0.43) compared with +0.72 kg in usual care group (95% CI 0.09, 1.35) (change difference −0.95 kg, 95% CI −1.87, −0.04; group by treatment interaction p = 0.04); −2.24 cm waist measurement in intervention group (95% CI −3.01, −1.42) compared with −1.74 cm in usual care group (95% CI −2.52, −0.96) (change difference −0.50 cm, 95% CI −1.63, 0.63; group by treatment interaction p = 0.389); and +0.18 mmol/l fasting blood glucose in intervention group (95% CI 0.11, 0.24) compared with +0.22 mmol/l in usual care group (95% CI 0.16, 0.29) (change difference −0.05 mmol/l, 95% CI −0.14, 0.05; group by treatment interaction p = 0.331). Only 10% of women attended all sessions, 53% attended one individual and at least one group session, and 34% attended no sessions. Loss to follow-up was 27% and 21% for the intervention and control groups, respectively, primarily due to subsequent pregnancies. Study limitations include low exposure to the full intervention and glucose metabolism profiles being near normal at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Although a 1-kg weight difference has the potential to be significant for reducing diabetes risk, the level of engagement during the first postnatal year was low. Further research is needed to improve engagement, including participant involvement in study design; it is potentially more effective to implement annual diabetes screening until women develop prediabetes before offering an intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000338066 Public Library of Science 2016-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4961439/ /pubmed/27459502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002092 Text en © 2016 O’Reilly et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article O’Reilly, Sharleen L. Dunbar, James A. Versace, Vincent Janus, Edward Best, James D. Carter, Rob Oats, Jeremy J. N. Skinner, Timothy Ackland, Michael Phillips, Paddy A. Ebeling, Peter R. Reynolds, John Shih, Sophy T. F. Hagger, Virginia Coates, Michael Wildey, Carol Mothers after Gestational Diabetes in Australia (MAGDA): A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Postnatal Diabetes Prevention Program |
title | Mothers after Gestational Diabetes in Australia (MAGDA): A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Postnatal Diabetes Prevention Program |
title_full | Mothers after Gestational Diabetes in Australia (MAGDA): A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Postnatal Diabetes Prevention Program |
title_fullStr | Mothers after Gestational Diabetes in Australia (MAGDA): A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Postnatal Diabetes Prevention Program |
title_full_unstemmed | Mothers after Gestational Diabetes in Australia (MAGDA): A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Postnatal Diabetes Prevention Program |
title_short | Mothers after Gestational Diabetes in Australia (MAGDA): A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Postnatal Diabetes Prevention Program |
title_sort | mothers after gestational diabetes in australia (magda): a randomised controlled trial of a postnatal diabetes prevention program |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4961439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27459502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002092 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oreillysharleenl mothersaftergestationaldiabetesinaustraliamagdaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapostnataldiabetespreventionprogram AT dunbarjamesa mothersaftergestationaldiabetesinaustraliamagdaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapostnataldiabetespreventionprogram AT versacevincent mothersaftergestationaldiabetesinaustraliamagdaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapostnataldiabetespreventionprogram AT janusedward mothersaftergestationaldiabetesinaustraliamagdaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapostnataldiabetespreventionprogram AT bestjamesd mothersaftergestationaldiabetesinaustraliamagdaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapostnataldiabetespreventionprogram AT carterrob mothersaftergestationaldiabetesinaustraliamagdaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapostnataldiabetespreventionprogram AT oatsjeremyjn mothersaftergestationaldiabetesinaustraliamagdaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapostnataldiabetespreventionprogram AT skinnertimothy mothersaftergestationaldiabetesinaustraliamagdaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapostnataldiabetespreventionprogram AT acklandmichael mothersaftergestationaldiabetesinaustraliamagdaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapostnataldiabetespreventionprogram AT phillipspaddya mothersaftergestationaldiabetesinaustraliamagdaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapostnataldiabetespreventionprogram AT ebelingpeterr mothersaftergestationaldiabetesinaustraliamagdaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapostnataldiabetespreventionprogram AT reynoldsjohn mothersaftergestationaldiabetesinaustraliamagdaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapostnataldiabetespreventionprogram AT shihsophytf mothersaftergestationaldiabetesinaustraliamagdaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapostnataldiabetespreventionprogram AT haggervirginia mothersaftergestationaldiabetesinaustraliamagdaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapostnataldiabetespreventionprogram AT coatesmichael mothersaftergestationaldiabetesinaustraliamagdaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapostnataldiabetespreventionprogram AT wildeycarol mothersaftergestationaldiabetesinaustraliamagdaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapostnataldiabetespreventionprogram AT mothersaftergestationaldiabetesinaustraliamagdaarandomisedcontrolledtrialofapostnataldiabetespreventionprogram |