Cargando…

Tissue Response to Deep Brain Stimulation and Microlesion: A Comparative Study

OBJECTIVES: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used for a variety of movement disorders, including Parkinson's disease. There are several theories regarding the biology and mechanisms of action of DBS. Previously, we observed an up‐regulation of neural progenitor cell proliferation in post‐mortem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vedam‐Mai, Vinata, Baradaran‐Shoraka, Massoud, Reynolds, Brent A., Okun, Michael S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4961567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27018335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.12406
_version_ 1782444683379605504
author Vedam‐Mai, Vinata
Baradaran‐Shoraka, Massoud
Reynolds, Brent A.
Okun, Michael S.
author_facet Vedam‐Mai, Vinata
Baradaran‐Shoraka, Massoud
Reynolds, Brent A.
Okun, Michael S.
author_sort Vedam‐Mai, Vinata
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used for a variety of movement disorders, including Parkinson's disease. There are several theories regarding the biology and mechanisms of action of DBS. Previously, we observed an up‐regulation of neural progenitor cell proliferation in post‐mortem tissue suggesting that DBS can influence cellular plasticity in regions beyond the site of stimulation. We wanted to support these observations and investigate the relationship if any, between DBS, neural progenitor cells, and microglia. METHODS: We used naïve rats in this study for DBS electrode implantation, stimulation, and microlesions. We used immunohistochemistry techniques for labeling microglial and progenitor cells, and fluorescence microscopy for viewing and quantification of labeled cells. RESULTS: We present data that demonstrates a reciprocal relationship of microglia and neural precursor cells in the presence of acute high frequency stimulation. In our hands, stimulated animals demonstrate significantly lower numbers of activated microglia (p = 0.026) when compared to microlesion and sham animals. The subthalamic region surrounding the DBS stimulating electrode reveals a significant increase in the number of neural precursor cells expressing cell cycle markers, plasticity and precursor cell markers (Ki67; p = 0.0013, MCM2; p = 0.0002). INTERPRETATION: We conclude that in this animal model, acute DBS results in modest local progenitor cell proliferation and influenced the total number of activated microglia. This could be of clinical significance in patients with PD, as it is thought to progress via neuroinflammatory processes involving microglia, cytokines, and the complement system. Further studies are required to comprehend the behavior of microglia in different activation states and their ability to regulate adult neurogenesis under physiologic and pathologic conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4961567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49615672016-11-02 Tissue Response to Deep Brain Stimulation and Microlesion: A Comparative Study Vedam‐Mai, Vinata Baradaran‐Shoraka, Massoud Reynolds, Brent A. Okun, Michael S. Neuromodulation Invasive Brain Stimulation OBJECTIVES: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used for a variety of movement disorders, including Parkinson's disease. There are several theories regarding the biology and mechanisms of action of DBS. Previously, we observed an up‐regulation of neural progenitor cell proliferation in post‐mortem tissue suggesting that DBS can influence cellular plasticity in regions beyond the site of stimulation. We wanted to support these observations and investigate the relationship if any, between DBS, neural progenitor cells, and microglia. METHODS: We used naïve rats in this study for DBS electrode implantation, stimulation, and microlesions. We used immunohistochemistry techniques for labeling microglial and progenitor cells, and fluorescence microscopy for viewing and quantification of labeled cells. RESULTS: We present data that demonstrates a reciprocal relationship of microglia and neural precursor cells in the presence of acute high frequency stimulation. In our hands, stimulated animals demonstrate significantly lower numbers of activated microglia (p = 0.026) when compared to microlesion and sham animals. The subthalamic region surrounding the DBS stimulating electrode reveals a significant increase in the number of neural precursor cells expressing cell cycle markers, plasticity and precursor cell markers (Ki67; p = 0.0013, MCM2; p = 0.0002). INTERPRETATION: We conclude that in this animal model, acute DBS results in modest local progenitor cell proliferation and influenced the total number of activated microglia. This could be of clinical significance in patients with PD, as it is thought to progress via neuroinflammatory processes involving microglia, cytokines, and the complement system. Further studies are required to comprehend the behavior of microglia in different activation states and their ability to regulate adult neurogenesis under physiologic and pathologic conditions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-03-28 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4961567/ /pubmed/27018335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.12406 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Neuromodulation Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Invasive Brain Stimulation
Vedam‐Mai, Vinata
Baradaran‐Shoraka, Massoud
Reynolds, Brent A.
Okun, Michael S.
Tissue Response to Deep Brain Stimulation and Microlesion: A Comparative Study
title Tissue Response to Deep Brain Stimulation and Microlesion: A Comparative Study
title_full Tissue Response to Deep Brain Stimulation and Microlesion: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Tissue Response to Deep Brain Stimulation and Microlesion: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Tissue Response to Deep Brain Stimulation and Microlesion: A Comparative Study
title_short Tissue Response to Deep Brain Stimulation and Microlesion: A Comparative Study
title_sort tissue response to deep brain stimulation and microlesion: a comparative study
topic Invasive Brain Stimulation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4961567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27018335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.12406
work_keys_str_mv AT vedammaivinata tissueresponsetodeepbrainstimulationandmicrolesionacomparativestudy
AT baradaranshorakamassoud tissueresponsetodeepbrainstimulationandmicrolesionacomparativestudy
AT reynoldsbrenta tissueresponsetodeepbrainstimulationandmicrolesionacomparativestudy
AT okunmichaels tissueresponsetodeepbrainstimulationandmicrolesionacomparativestudy