Cargando…
Tissue Response to Deep Brain Stimulation and Microlesion: A Comparative Study
OBJECTIVES: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used for a variety of movement disorders, including Parkinson's disease. There are several theories regarding the biology and mechanisms of action of DBS. Previously, we observed an up‐regulation of neural progenitor cell proliferation in post‐mortem...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4961567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27018335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.12406 |
_version_ | 1782444683379605504 |
---|---|
author | Vedam‐Mai, Vinata Baradaran‐Shoraka, Massoud Reynolds, Brent A. Okun, Michael S. |
author_facet | Vedam‐Mai, Vinata Baradaran‐Shoraka, Massoud Reynolds, Brent A. Okun, Michael S. |
author_sort | Vedam‐Mai, Vinata |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used for a variety of movement disorders, including Parkinson's disease. There are several theories regarding the biology and mechanisms of action of DBS. Previously, we observed an up‐regulation of neural progenitor cell proliferation in post‐mortem tissue suggesting that DBS can influence cellular plasticity in regions beyond the site of stimulation. We wanted to support these observations and investigate the relationship if any, between DBS, neural progenitor cells, and microglia. METHODS: We used naïve rats in this study for DBS electrode implantation, stimulation, and microlesions. We used immunohistochemistry techniques for labeling microglial and progenitor cells, and fluorescence microscopy for viewing and quantification of labeled cells. RESULTS: We present data that demonstrates a reciprocal relationship of microglia and neural precursor cells in the presence of acute high frequency stimulation. In our hands, stimulated animals demonstrate significantly lower numbers of activated microglia (p = 0.026) when compared to microlesion and sham animals. The subthalamic region surrounding the DBS stimulating electrode reveals a significant increase in the number of neural precursor cells expressing cell cycle markers, plasticity and precursor cell markers (Ki67; p = 0.0013, MCM2; p = 0.0002). INTERPRETATION: We conclude that in this animal model, acute DBS results in modest local progenitor cell proliferation and influenced the total number of activated microglia. This could be of clinical significance in patients with PD, as it is thought to progress via neuroinflammatory processes involving microglia, cytokines, and the complement system. Further studies are required to comprehend the behavior of microglia in different activation states and their ability to regulate adult neurogenesis under physiologic and pathologic conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4961567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49615672016-11-02 Tissue Response to Deep Brain Stimulation and Microlesion: A Comparative Study Vedam‐Mai, Vinata Baradaran‐Shoraka, Massoud Reynolds, Brent A. Okun, Michael S. Neuromodulation Invasive Brain Stimulation OBJECTIVES: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used for a variety of movement disorders, including Parkinson's disease. There are several theories regarding the biology and mechanisms of action of DBS. Previously, we observed an up‐regulation of neural progenitor cell proliferation in post‐mortem tissue suggesting that DBS can influence cellular plasticity in regions beyond the site of stimulation. We wanted to support these observations and investigate the relationship if any, between DBS, neural progenitor cells, and microglia. METHODS: We used naïve rats in this study for DBS electrode implantation, stimulation, and microlesions. We used immunohistochemistry techniques for labeling microglial and progenitor cells, and fluorescence microscopy for viewing and quantification of labeled cells. RESULTS: We present data that demonstrates a reciprocal relationship of microglia and neural precursor cells in the presence of acute high frequency stimulation. In our hands, stimulated animals demonstrate significantly lower numbers of activated microglia (p = 0.026) when compared to microlesion and sham animals. The subthalamic region surrounding the DBS stimulating electrode reveals a significant increase in the number of neural precursor cells expressing cell cycle markers, plasticity and precursor cell markers (Ki67; p = 0.0013, MCM2; p = 0.0002). INTERPRETATION: We conclude that in this animal model, acute DBS results in modest local progenitor cell proliferation and influenced the total number of activated microglia. This could be of clinical significance in patients with PD, as it is thought to progress via neuroinflammatory processes involving microglia, cytokines, and the complement system. Further studies are required to comprehend the behavior of microglia in different activation states and their ability to regulate adult neurogenesis under physiologic and pathologic conditions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-03-28 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4961567/ /pubmed/27018335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.12406 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Neuromodulation Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Invasive Brain Stimulation Vedam‐Mai, Vinata Baradaran‐Shoraka, Massoud Reynolds, Brent A. Okun, Michael S. Tissue Response to Deep Brain Stimulation and Microlesion: A Comparative Study |
title | Tissue Response to Deep Brain Stimulation and Microlesion: A Comparative Study |
title_full | Tissue Response to Deep Brain Stimulation and Microlesion: A Comparative Study |
title_fullStr | Tissue Response to Deep Brain Stimulation and Microlesion: A Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Tissue Response to Deep Brain Stimulation and Microlesion: A Comparative Study |
title_short | Tissue Response to Deep Brain Stimulation and Microlesion: A Comparative Study |
title_sort | tissue response to deep brain stimulation and microlesion: a comparative study |
topic | Invasive Brain Stimulation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4961567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27018335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.12406 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vedammaivinata tissueresponsetodeepbrainstimulationandmicrolesionacomparativestudy AT baradaranshorakamassoud tissueresponsetodeepbrainstimulationandmicrolesionacomparativestudy AT reynoldsbrenta tissueresponsetodeepbrainstimulationandmicrolesionacomparativestudy AT okunmichaels tissueresponsetodeepbrainstimulationandmicrolesionacomparativestudy |