Cargando…
Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy
PURPOSE: The 2-port laparoscopic appendectomy technique (TLA) is between the conventional 3-port and single-port laparoscopic appendectomy surgeries. We compared postoperative pain and cosmetic results after TLA with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) by a 3-port device. METHODS: Patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Surgical Society
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4961887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27478810 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.91.2.59 |
_version_ | 1782444726240149504 |
---|---|
author | Donmez, Turgut Hut, Adnan Avaroglu, Huseyin Uzman, Sinan Yildirim, Dogan Ferahman, Sina Cekic, Erdinc |
author_facet | Donmez, Turgut Hut, Adnan Avaroglu, Huseyin Uzman, Sinan Yildirim, Dogan Ferahman, Sina Cekic, Erdinc |
author_sort | Donmez, Turgut |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The 2-port laparoscopic appendectomy technique (TLA) is between the conventional 3-port and single-port laparoscopic appendectomy surgeries. We compared postoperative pain and cosmetic results after TLA with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) by a 3-port device. METHODS: Patients undergoing TLA were matched with patients undergoing CLA between February 2015 and November 2015 at the same institution. Thirty-two patients underwent TLA with a needle grasper. The appendix was secured by a percutaneous organ-holding device (needle grasper), then removed through a puncture at McBurney's point. Another 38 patients underwent CLA. Patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected and evaluated. RESULTS: One patient in the TLA group developed a wound infection and 1 patient in the CLA group developed a postoperative intra-abdominal abscess and 3 wound infections. There was no significant difference between the groups when comparing the length of hospital stay, time until oral intake, and other complications. The pain score in the first 12 hours after surgery was significanly higher in CLA group than the TLA group (P < 0.001). Operative time was significantly shorter in the CLA group compared to the TLA group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: TLA using a needle grasper was associated with a significantly lower pain score 12 hours after surgery, better cosmetic results, and lower cost, than the CLA 3-port procedure because of the fewer number of ports. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4961887 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Korean Surgical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49618872016-08-01 Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy Donmez, Turgut Hut, Adnan Avaroglu, Huseyin Uzman, Sinan Yildirim, Dogan Ferahman, Sina Cekic, Erdinc Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: The 2-port laparoscopic appendectomy technique (TLA) is between the conventional 3-port and single-port laparoscopic appendectomy surgeries. We compared postoperative pain and cosmetic results after TLA with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) by a 3-port device. METHODS: Patients undergoing TLA were matched with patients undergoing CLA between February 2015 and November 2015 at the same institution. Thirty-two patients underwent TLA with a needle grasper. The appendix was secured by a percutaneous organ-holding device (needle grasper), then removed through a puncture at McBurney's point. Another 38 patients underwent CLA. Patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected and evaluated. RESULTS: One patient in the TLA group developed a wound infection and 1 patient in the CLA group developed a postoperative intra-abdominal abscess and 3 wound infections. There was no significant difference between the groups when comparing the length of hospital stay, time until oral intake, and other complications. The pain score in the first 12 hours after surgery was significanly higher in CLA group than the TLA group (P < 0.001). Operative time was significantly shorter in the CLA group compared to the TLA group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: TLA using a needle grasper was associated with a significantly lower pain score 12 hours after surgery, better cosmetic results, and lower cost, than the CLA 3-port procedure because of the fewer number of ports. The Korean Surgical Society 2016-08 2016-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4961887/ /pubmed/27478810 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.91.2.59 Text en Copyright © 2016, the Korean Surgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Donmez, Turgut Hut, Adnan Avaroglu, Huseyin Uzman, Sinan Yildirim, Dogan Ferahman, Sina Cekic, Erdinc Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy |
title | Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy |
title_full | Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy |
title_fullStr | Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy |
title_short | Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy |
title_sort | two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4961887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27478810 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.91.2.59 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT donmezturgut twoportlaparoscopicappendectomyassistedwithneedlegraspercomparisonwithconventionallaparoscopicappendectomy AT hutadnan twoportlaparoscopicappendectomyassistedwithneedlegraspercomparisonwithconventionallaparoscopicappendectomy AT avarogluhuseyin twoportlaparoscopicappendectomyassistedwithneedlegraspercomparisonwithconventionallaparoscopicappendectomy AT uzmansinan twoportlaparoscopicappendectomyassistedwithneedlegraspercomparisonwithconventionallaparoscopicappendectomy AT yildirimdogan twoportlaparoscopicappendectomyassistedwithneedlegraspercomparisonwithconventionallaparoscopicappendectomy AT ferahmansina twoportlaparoscopicappendectomyassistedwithneedlegraspercomparisonwithconventionallaparoscopicappendectomy AT cekicerdinc twoportlaparoscopicappendectomyassistedwithneedlegraspercomparisonwithconventionallaparoscopicappendectomy |