Cargando…

Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy

PURPOSE: The 2-port laparoscopic appendectomy technique (TLA) is between the conventional 3-port and single-port laparoscopic appendectomy surgeries. We compared postoperative pain and cosmetic results after TLA with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) by a 3-port device. METHODS: Patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donmez, Turgut, Hut, Adnan, Avaroglu, Huseyin, Uzman, Sinan, Yildirim, Dogan, Ferahman, Sina, Cekic, Erdinc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Surgical Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4961887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27478810
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.91.2.59
_version_ 1782444726240149504
author Donmez, Turgut
Hut, Adnan
Avaroglu, Huseyin
Uzman, Sinan
Yildirim, Dogan
Ferahman, Sina
Cekic, Erdinc
author_facet Donmez, Turgut
Hut, Adnan
Avaroglu, Huseyin
Uzman, Sinan
Yildirim, Dogan
Ferahman, Sina
Cekic, Erdinc
author_sort Donmez, Turgut
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The 2-port laparoscopic appendectomy technique (TLA) is between the conventional 3-port and single-port laparoscopic appendectomy surgeries. We compared postoperative pain and cosmetic results after TLA with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) by a 3-port device. METHODS: Patients undergoing TLA were matched with patients undergoing CLA between February 2015 and November 2015 at the same institution. Thirty-two patients underwent TLA with a needle grasper. The appendix was secured by a percutaneous organ-holding device (needle grasper), then removed through a puncture at McBurney's point. Another 38 patients underwent CLA. Patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected and evaluated. RESULTS: One patient in the TLA group developed a wound infection and 1 patient in the CLA group developed a postoperative intra-abdominal abscess and 3 wound infections. There was no significant difference between the groups when comparing the length of hospital stay, time until oral intake, and other complications. The pain score in the first 12 hours after surgery was significanly higher in CLA group than the TLA group (P < 0.001). Operative time was significantly shorter in the CLA group compared to the TLA group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: TLA using a needle grasper was associated with a significantly lower pain score 12 hours after surgery, better cosmetic results, and lower cost, than the CLA 3-port procedure because of the fewer number of ports.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4961887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Surgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49618872016-08-01 Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy Donmez, Turgut Hut, Adnan Avaroglu, Huseyin Uzman, Sinan Yildirim, Dogan Ferahman, Sina Cekic, Erdinc Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: The 2-port laparoscopic appendectomy technique (TLA) is between the conventional 3-port and single-port laparoscopic appendectomy surgeries. We compared postoperative pain and cosmetic results after TLA with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) by a 3-port device. METHODS: Patients undergoing TLA were matched with patients undergoing CLA between February 2015 and November 2015 at the same institution. Thirty-two patients underwent TLA with a needle grasper. The appendix was secured by a percutaneous organ-holding device (needle grasper), then removed through a puncture at McBurney's point. Another 38 patients underwent CLA. Patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected and evaluated. RESULTS: One patient in the TLA group developed a wound infection and 1 patient in the CLA group developed a postoperative intra-abdominal abscess and 3 wound infections. There was no significant difference between the groups when comparing the length of hospital stay, time until oral intake, and other complications. The pain score in the first 12 hours after surgery was significanly higher in CLA group than the TLA group (P < 0.001). Operative time was significantly shorter in the CLA group compared to the TLA group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: TLA using a needle grasper was associated with a significantly lower pain score 12 hours after surgery, better cosmetic results, and lower cost, than the CLA 3-port procedure because of the fewer number of ports. The Korean Surgical Society 2016-08 2016-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4961887/ /pubmed/27478810 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.91.2.59 Text en Copyright © 2016, the Korean Surgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Donmez, Turgut
Hut, Adnan
Avaroglu, Huseyin
Uzman, Sinan
Yildirim, Dogan
Ferahman, Sina
Cekic, Erdinc
Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy
title Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy
title_full Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy
title_fullStr Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy
title_full_unstemmed Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy
title_short Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy
title_sort two-port laparoscopic appendectomy assisted with needle grasper comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4961887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27478810
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.91.2.59
work_keys_str_mv AT donmezturgut twoportlaparoscopicappendectomyassistedwithneedlegraspercomparisonwithconventionallaparoscopicappendectomy
AT hutadnan twoportlaparoscopicappendectomyassistedwithneedlegraspercomparisonwithconventionallaparoscopicappendectomy
AT avarogluhuseyin twoportlaparoscopicappendectomyassistedwithneedlegraspercomparisonwithconventionallaparoscopicappendectomy
AT uzmansinan twoportlaparoscopicappendectomyassistedwithneedlegraspercomparisonwithconventionallaparoscopicappendectomy
AT yildirimdogan twoportlaparoscopicappendectomyassistedwithneedlegraspercomparisonwithconventionallaparoscopicappendectomy
AT ferahmansina twoportlaparoscopicappendectomyassistedwithneedlegraspercomparisonwithconventionallaparoscopicappendectomy
AT cekicerdinc twoportlaparoscopicappendectomyassistedwithneedlegraspercomparisonwithconventionallaparoscopicappendectomy