Cargando…

Post-exercise branched chain amino acid supplementation does not affect recovery markers following three consecutive high intensity resistance training bouts compared to carbohydrate supplementation

BACKGROUND: Amino acid supplementation has been shown to potentially reduced exercise-induced muscle soreness. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine if branched chain amino acid and carbohydrate (BCAACHO) versus carbohydrate-only sports drink (CHO) supplementation attenuated markers of musc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kephart, Wesley C., Mumford, Petey W., McCloskey, Anna E., Holland, A. Maleah, Shake, Joshua J., Mobley, C. Brooks, Jagodinsky, Adam E., Weimar, Wendi H., Oliver, Gretchen D., Young, Kaelin C., Moon, Jordan R., Roberts, Michael D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4962429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27468258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-016-0142-y
_version_ 1782444833700315136
author Kephart, Wesley C.
Mumford, Petey W.
McCloskey, Anna E.
Holland, A. Maleah
Shake, Joshua J.
Mobley, C. Brooks
Jagodinsky, Adam E.
Weimar, Wendi H.
Oliver, Gretchen D.
Young, Kaelin C.
Moon, Jordan R.
Roberts, Michael D.
author_facet Kephart, Wesley C.
Mumford, Petey W.
McCloskey, Anna E.
Holland, A. Maleah
Shake, Joshua J.
Mobley, C. Brooks
Jagodinsky, Adam E.
Weimar, Wendi H.
Oliver, Gretchen D.
Young, Kaelin C.
Moon, Jordan R.
Roberts, Michael D.
author_sort Kephart, Wesley C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Amino acid supplementation has been shown to potentially reduced exercise-induced muscle soreness. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine if branched chain amino acid and carbohydrate (BCAACHO) versus carbohydrate-only sports drink (CHO) supplementation attenuated markers of muscle damage while preserving performance markers following 3 days of intense weight training. METHODS: Healthy resistance-trained males (n = 30) performed preliminary testing (T1) whereby they: 1) donated a baseline blood draw, 2) performed knee extensor dynamometry to obtain peak quadriceps isometric and isokinetic torque as well as electromyography (EMG) activity at 60°/s and 120°/s, and 3) performed a one repetition maximum (1RM) barbell back squat. The following week participants performed 10 sets x 5 repetitions at 80 % of their 1RM barbell back squat for 3 consecutive days and 48 h following the third lifting bout participants returned for (T2) testing whereby they repeated the T1 battery. Immediately following and 24 h after the three lifting bouts, participants were randomly assigned to consume one of two commercial products in 600 mL of tap water: 1) BCAAs and CHO (3 g/d L-leucine, 1 g/d L-isoleucine and 2 g/d L-valine with 2 g of CHO; n = 15), or 2) 42 g of CHO only (n = 15). Additionally, venous blood was drawn 24 h following the first and second lifting bouts and 48 h following the third bout to assess serum myoglobin concentrations, and a visual analog scale was utilized prior, during, and after the 3-d protocol to measure subjective perceptions of muscular soreness. RESULTS: There were similar decrements in 1RM squat strength and isokinetic peak torque measures in the BCAA-CHO and CHO groups. Serum myoglobin concentrations (p = 0.027) and perceived muscle soreness (p < 0.001) increased over the intervention regardless of supplementation. A group*time interaction was observed for monocyte percentages (p = 0.01) whereby BCAA-CHO supplementation attenuated increases in this variable over the duration of the protocol compared to CHO supplementation. CONCLUSION: BCAA-CHO supplementation did not reduce decrements in lower body strength or improve select markers of muscle damage/soreness compared to CHO supplementation over three consecutive days of intense lower-body training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4962429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49624292016-07-28 Post-exercise branched chain amino acid supplementation does not affect recovery markers following three consecutive high intensity resistance training bouts compared to carbohydrate supplementation Kephart, Wesley C. Mumford, Petey W. McCloskey, Anna E. Holland, A. Maleah Shake, Joshua J. Mobley, C. Brooks Jagodinsky, Adam E. Weimar, Wendi H. Oliver, Gretchen D. Young, Kaelin C. Moon, Jordan R. Roberts, Michael D. J Int Soc Sports Nutr Research Article BACKGROUND: Amino acid supplementation has been shown to potentially reduced exercise-induced muscle soreness. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine if branched chain amino acid and carbohydrate (BCAACHO) versus carbohydrate-only sports drink (CHO) supplementation attenuated markers of muscle damage while preserving performance markers following 3 days of intense weight training. METHODS: Healthy resistance-trained males (n = 30) performed preliminary testing (T1) whereby they: 1) donated a baseline blood draw, 2) performed knee extensor dynamometry to obtain peak quadriceps isometric and isokinetic torque as well as electromyography (EMG) activity at 60°/s and 120°/s, and 3) performed a one repetition maximum (1RM) barbell back squat. The following week participants performed 10 sets x 5 repetitions at 80 % of their 1RM barbell back squat for 3 consecutive days and 48 h following the third lifting bout participants returned for (T2) testing whereby they repeated the T1 battery. Immediately following and 24 h after the three lifting bouts, participants were randomly assigned to consume one of two commercial products in 600 mL of tap water: 1) BCAAs and CHO (3 g/d L-leucine, 1 g/d L-isoleucine and 2 g/d L-valine with 2 g of CHO; n = 15), or 2) 42 g of CHO only (n = 15). Additionally, venous blood was drawn 24 h following the first and second lifting bouts and 48 h following the third bout to assess serum myoglobin concentrations, and a visual analog scale was utilized prior, during, and after the 3-d protocol to measure subjective perceptions of muscular soreness. RESULTS: There were similar decrements in 1RM squat strength and isokinetic peak torque measures in the BCAA-CHO and CHO groups. Serum myoglobin concentrations (p = 0.027) and perceived muscle soreness (p < 0.001) increased over the intervention regardless of supplementation. A group*time interaction was observed for monocyte percentages (p = 0.01) whereby BCAA-CHO supplementation attenuated increases in this variable over the duration of the protocol compared to CHO supplementation. CONCLUSION: BCAA-CHO supplementation did not reduce decrements in lower body strength or improve select markers of muscle damage/soreness compared to CHO supplementation over three consecutive days of intense lower-body training. BioMed Central 2016-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4962429/ /pubmed/27468258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-016-0142-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kephart, Wesley C.
Mumford, Petey W.
McCloskey, Anna E.
Holland, A. Maleah
Shake, Joshua J.
Mobley, C. Brooks
Jagodinsky, Adam E.
Weimar, Wendi H.
Oliver, Gretchen D.
Young, Kaelin C.
Moon, Jordan R.
Roberts, Michael D.
Post-exercise branched chain amino acid supplementation does not affect recovery markers following three consecutive high intensity resistance training bouts compared to carbohydrate supplementation
title Post-exercise branched chain amino acid supplementation does not affect recovery markers following three consecutive high intensity resistance training bouts compared to carbohydrate supplementation
title_full Post-exercise branched chain amino acid supplementation does not affect recovery markers following three consecutive high intensity resistance training bouts compared to carbohydrate supplementation
title_fullStr Post-exercise branched chain amino acid supplementation does not affect recovery markers following three consecutive high intensity resistance training bouts compared to carbohydrate supplementation
title_full_unstemmed Post-exercise branched chain amino acid supplementation does not affect recovery markers following three consecutive high intensity resistance training bouts compared to carbohydrate supplementation
title_short Post-exercise branched chain amino acid supplementation does not affect recovery markers following three consecutive high intensity resistance training bouts compared to carbohydrate supplementation
title_sort post-exercise branched chain amino acid supplementation does not affect recovery markers following three consecutive high intensity resistance training bouts compared to carbohydrate supplementation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4962429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27468258
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-016-0142-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kephartwesleyc postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation
AT mumfordpeteyw postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation
AT mccloskeyannae postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation
AT hollandamaleah postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation
AT shakejoshuaj postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation
AT mobleycbrooks postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation
AT jagodinskyadame postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation
AT weimarwendih postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation
AT olivergretchend postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation
AT youngkaelinc postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation
AT moonjordanr postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation
AT robertsmichaeld postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation