Cargando…
Post-exercise branched chain amino acid supplementation does not affect recovery markers following three consecutive high intensity resistance training bouts compared to carbohydrate supplementation
BACKGROUND: Amino acid supplementation has been shown to potentially reduced exercise-induced muscle soreness. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine if branched chain amino acid and carbohydrate (BCAACHO) versus carbohydrate-only sports drink (CHO) supplementation attenuated markers of musc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4962429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27468258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-016-0142-y |
_version_ | 1782444833700315136 |
---|---|
author | Kephart, Wesley C. Mumford, Petey W. McCloskey, Anna E. Holland, A. Maleah Shake, Joshua J. Mobley, C. Brooks Jagodinsky, Adam E. Weimar, Wendi H. Oliver, Gretchen D. Young, Kaelin C. Moon, Jordan R. Roberts, Michael D. |
author_facet | Kephart, Wesley C. Mumford, Petey W. McCloskey, Anna E. Holland, A. Maleah Shake, Joshua J. Mobley, C. Brooks Jagodinsky, Adam E. Weimar, Wendi H. Oliver, Gretchen D. Young, Kaelin C. Moon, Jordan R. Roberts, Michael D. |
author_sort | Kephart, Wesley C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Amino acid supplementation has been shown to potentially reduced exercise-induced muscle soreness. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine if branched chain amino acid and carbohydrate (BCAACHO) versus carbohydrate-only sports drink (CHO) supplementation attenuated markers of muscle damage while preserving performance markers following 3 days of intense weight training. METHODS: Healthy resistance-trained males (n = 30) performed preliminary testing (T1) whereby they: 1) donated a baseline blood draw, 2) performed knee extensor dynamometry to obtain peak quadriceps isometric and isokinetic torque as well as electromyography (EMG) activity at 60°/s and 120°/s, and 3) performed a one repetition maximum (1RM) barbell back squat. The following week participants performed 10 sets x 5 repetitions at 80 % of their 1RM barbell back squat for 3 consecutive days and 48 h following the third lifting bout participants returned for (T2) testing whereby they repeated the T1 battery. Immediately following and 24 h after the three lifting bouts, participants were randomly assigned to consume one of two commercial products in 600 mL of tap water: 1) BCAAs and CHO (3 g/d L-leucine, 1 g/d L-isoleucine and 2 g/d L-valine with 2 g of CHO; n = 15), or 2) 42 g of CHO only (n = 15). Additionally, venous blood was drawn 24 h following the first and second lifting bouts and 48 h following the third bout to assess serum myoglobin concentrations, and a visual analog scale was utilized prior, during, and after the 3-d protocol to measure subjective perceptions of muscular soreness. RESULTS: There were similar decrements in 1RM squat strength and isokinetic peak torque measures in the BCAA-CHO and CHO groups. Serum myoglobin concentrations (p = 0.027) and perceived muscle soreness (p < 0.001) increased over the intervention regardless of supplementation. A group*time interaction was observed for monocyte percentages (p = 0.01) whereby BCAA-CHO supplementation attenuated increases in this variable over the duration of the protocol compared to CHO supplementation. CONCLUSION: BCAA-CHO supplementation did not reduce decrements in lower body strength or improve select markers of muscle damage/soreness compared to CHO supplementation over three consecutive days of intense lower-body training. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4962429 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49624292016-07-28 Post-exercise branched chain amino acid supplementation does not affect recovery markers following three consecutive high intensity resistance training bouts compared to carbohydrate supplementation Kephart, Wesley C. Mumford, Petey W. McCloskey, Anna E. Holland, A. Maleah Shake, Joshua J. Mobley, C. Brooks Jagodinsky, Adam E. Weimar, Wendi H. Oliver, Gretchen D. Young, Kaelin C. Moon, Jordan R. Roberts, Michael D. J Int Soc Sports Nutr Research Article BACKGROUND: Amino acid supplementation has been shown to potentially reduced exercise-induced muscle soreness. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine if branched chain amino acid and carbohydrate (BCAACHO) versus carbohydrate-only sports drink (CHO) supplementation attenuated markers of muscle damage while preserving performance markers following 3 days of intense weight training. METHODS: Healthy resistance-trained males (n = 30) performed preliminary testing (T1) whereby they: 1) donated a baseline blood draw, 2) performed knee extensor dynamometry to obtain peak quadriceps isometric and isokinetic torque as well as electromyography (EMG) activity at 60°/s and 120°/s, and 3) performed a one repetition maximum (1RM) barbell back squat. The following week participants performed 10 sets x 5 repetitions at 80 % of their 1RM barbell back squat for 3 consecutive days and 48 h following the third lifting bout participants returned for (T2) testing whereby they repeated the T1 battery. Immediately following and 24 h after the three lifting bouts, participants were randomly assigned to consume one of two commercial products in 600 mL of tap water: 1) BCAAs and CHO (3 g/d L-leucine, 1 g/d L-isoleucine and 2 g/d L-valine with 2 g of CHO; n = 15), or 2) 42 g of CHO only (n = 15). Additionally, venous blood was drawn 24 h following the first and second lifting bouts and 48 h following the third bout to assess serum myoglobin concentrations, and a visual analog scale was utilized prior, during, and after the 3-d protocol to measure subjective perceptions of muscular soreness. RESULTS: There were similar decrements in 1RM squat strength and isokinetic peak torque measures in the BCAA-CHO and CHO groups. Serum myoglobin concentrations (p = 0.027) and perceived muscle soreness (p < 0.001) increased over the intervention regardless of supplementation. A group*time interaction was observed for monocyte percentages (p = 0.01) whereby BCAA-CHO supplementation attenuated increases in this variable over the duration of the protocol compared to CHO supplementation. CONCLUSION: BCAA-CHO supplementation did not reduce decrements in lower body strength or improve select markers of muscle damage/soreness compared to CHO supplementation over three consecutive days of intense lower-body training. BioMed Central 2016-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4962429/ /pubmed/27468258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-016-0142-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kephart, Wesley C. Mumford, Petey W. McCloskey, Anna E. Holland, A. Maleah Shake, Joshua J. Mobley, C. Brooks Jagodinsky, Adam E. Weimar, Wendi H. Oliver, Gretchen D. Young, Kaelin C. Moon, Jordan R. Roberts, Michael D. Post-exercise branched chain amino acid supplementation does not affect recovery markers following three consecutive high intensity resistance training bouts compared to carbohydrate supplementation |
title | Post-exercise branched chain amino acid supplementation does not affect recovery markers following three consecutive high intensity resistance training bouts compared to carbohydrate supplementation |
title_full | Post-exercise branched chain amino acid supplementation does not affect recovery markers following three consecutive high intensity resistance training bouts compared to carbohydrate supplementation |
title_fullStr | Post-exercise branched chain amino acid supplementation does not affect recovery markers following three consecutive high intensity resistance training bouts compared to carbohydrate supplementation |
title_full_unstemmed | Post-exercise branched chain amino acid supplementation does not affect recovery markers following three consecutive high intensity resistance training bouts compared to carbohydrate supplementation |
title_short | Post-exercise branched chain amino acid supplementation does not affect recovery markers following three consecutive high intensity resistance training bouts compared to carbohydrate supplementation |
title_sort | post-exercise branched chain amino acid supplementation does not affect recovery markers following three consecutive high intensity resistance training bouts compared to carbohydrate supplementation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4962429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27468258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-016-0142-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kephartwesleyc postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation AT mumfordpeteyw postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation AT mccloskeyannae postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation AT hollandamaleah postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation AT shakejoshuaj postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation AT mobleycbrooks postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation AT jagodinskyadame postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation AT weimarwendih postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation AT olivergretchend postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation AT youngkaelinc postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation AT moonjordanr postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation AT robertsmichaeld postexercisebranchedchainaminoacidsupplementationdoesnotaffectrecoverymarkersfollowingthreeconsecutivehighintensityresistancetrainingboutscomparedtocarbohydratesupplementation |