Cargando…

The effectiveness and safety of proton beam radiation therapy in children with malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumours: protocol for a systematic review

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to use a systematic review framework to identify and synthesise the evidence on the use of proton beam therapy (PBT) for the treatment of children with CNS tumours and where possible compare this to the use of photon radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: Standard systemati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Main, Caroline, Dandapani, Madhumita, Pritchard, Mark, Dodds, Rachel, Stevens, Simon P., Thorp, Nicky, Taylor, Roger E., Wheatley, Keith, Pizer, Barry, Morrall, Matthew, Phillips, Robert, English, Martin, Kearns, Pamela R., Wilne, Sophie, Wilson, Jayne S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4962509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27460473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0285-6
_version_ 1782444851704365056
author Main, Caroline
Dandapani, Madhumita
Pritchard, Mark
Dodds, Rachel
Stevens, Simon P.
Thorp, Nicky
Taylor, Roger E.
Wheatley, Keith
Pizer, Barry
Morrall, Matthew
Phillips, Robert
English, Martin
Kearns, Pamela R.
Wilne, Sophie
Wilson, Jayne S.
author_facet Main, Caroline
Dandapani, Madhumita
Pritchard, Mark
Dodds, Rachel
Stevens, Simon P.
Thorp, Nicky
Taylor, Roger E.
Wheatley, Keith
Pizer, Barry
Morrall, Matthew
Phillips, Robert
English, Martin
Kearns, Pamela R.
Wilne, Sophie
Wilson, Jayne S.
author_sort Main, Caroline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to use a systematic review framework to identify and synthesise the evidence on the use of proton beam therapy (PBT) for the treatment of children with CNS tumours and where possible compare this to the use of photon radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: Standard systematic review methods aimed at minimising bias will be employed for study identification, selection and data extraction. Twelve electronic databases have been searched, and further citation, hand searching and reference checking will be employed. Studies assessing the effects of PBT used either alone or as part of a multimodality treatment regimen in children with CNS tumours will be included. Relevant economic evaluations will also be identified. The outcomes are survival (overall, progression-free, event-free, disease-free), local and regional control rates, short- and long-term adverse events, functional status measures and quality of survival. Two reviewers will independently screen and select studies for inclusion in the review. All interventional study designs will be eligible for inclusion in the review. However, initial scoping searches indicate the evidence base is likely to be limited to case series studies, with no studies of a higher quality being identified. Quality assessment will be undertaken using pre-specified criteria and tailored to study design if applicable. Studies will be combined using a narrative synthesis, with differences in results between studies highlighted and discussed in relation to the patient population, intervention and study quality. Where appropriate, if no studies of a comparative design are identified, outcomes will be compared against a range of estimates from the literature for similar populations and treatment regimens from the best available evidence from studies that include the use of advanced conventional photon therapy. DISCUSSION: The evidence base for the use of PBT in children with CNS tumours is likely to be relatively sparse, highly heterogeneous and potentially of a low quality with small sample sizes. Furthermore, selection and publication biases may limit the internal and external validity of studies. However, any tentative results from the review on potential treatment effects can be used to plan better quality research studies that are of a design appropriate for outcome comparison with conventional therapy. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015029583 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0285-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4962509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49625092016-07-28 The effectiveness and safety of proton beam radiation therapy in children with malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumours: protocol for a systematic review Main, Caroline Dandapani, Madhumita Pritchard, Mark Dodds, Rachel Stevens, Simon P. Thorp, Nicky Taylor, Roger E. Wheatley, Keith Pizer, Barry Morrall, Matthew Phillips, Robert English, Martin Kearns, Pamela R. Wilne, Sophie Wilson, Jayne S. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to use a systematic review framework to identify and synthesise the evidence on the use of proton beam therapy (PBT) for the treatment of children with CNS tumours and where possible compare this to the use of photon radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: Standard systematic review methods aimed at minimising bias will be employed for study identification, selection and data extraction. Twelve electronic databases have been searched, and further citation, hand searching and reference checking will be employed. Studies assessing the effects of PBT used either alone or as part of a multimodality treatment regimen in children with CNS tumours will be included. Relevant economic evaluations will also be identified. The outcomes are survival (overall, progression-free, event-free, disease-free), local and regional control rates, short- and long-term adverse events, functional status measures and quality of survival. Two reviewers will independently screen and select studies for inclusion in the review. All interventional study designs will be eligible for inclusion in the review. However, initial scoping searches indicate the evidence base is likely to be limited to case series studies, with no studies of a higher quality being identified. Quality assessment will be undertaken using pre-specified criteria and tailored to study design if applicable. Studies will be combined using a narrative synthesis, with differences in results between studies highlighted and discussed in relation to the patient population, intervention and study quality. Where appropriate, if no studies of a comparative design are identified, outcomes will be compared against a range of estimates from the literature for similar populations and treatment regimens from the best available evidence from studies that include the use of advanced conventional photon therapy. DISCUSSION: The evidence base for the use of PBT in children with CNS tumours is likely to be relatively sparse, highly heterogeneous and potentially of a low quality with small sample sizes. Furthermore, selection and publication biases may limit the internal and external validity of studies. However, any tentative results from the review on potential treatment effects can be used to plan better quality research studies that are of a design appropriate for outcome comparison with conventional therapy. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015029583 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0285-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4962509/ /pubmed/27460473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0285-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Main, Caroline
Dandapani, Madhumita
Pritchard, Mark
Dodds, Rachel
Stevens, Simon P.
Thorp, Nicky
Taylor, Roger E.
Wheatley, Keith
Pizer, Barry
Morrall, Matthew
Phillips, Robert
English, Martin
Kearns, Pamela R.
Wilne, Sophie
Wilson, Jayne S.
The effectiveness and safety of proton beam radiation therapy in children with malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumours: protocol for a systematic review
title The effectiveness and safety of proton beam radiation therapy in children with malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumours: protocol for a systematic review
title_full The effectiveness and safety of proton beam radiation therapy in children with malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumours: protocol for a systematic review
title_fullStr The effectiveness and safety of proton beam radiation therapy in children with malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumours: protocol for a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness and safety of proton beam radiation therapy in children with malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumours: protocol for a systematic review
title_short The effectiveness and safety of proton beam radiation therapy in children with malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumours: protocol for a systematic review
title_sort effectiveness and safety of proton beam radiation therapy in children with malignant central nervous system (cns) tumours: protocol for a systematic review
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4962509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27460473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0285-6
work_keys_str_mv AT maincaroline theeffectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT dandapanimadhumita theeffectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT pritchardmark theeffectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT doddsrachel theeffectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT stevenssimonp theeffectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT thorpnicky theeffectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT taylorrogere theeffectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT wheatleykeith theeffectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT pizerbarry theeffectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT morrallmatthew theeffectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT phillipsrobert theeffectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT englishmartin theeffectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT kearnspamelar theeffectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT wilnesophie theeffectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT wilsonjaynes theeffectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT maincaroline effectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT dandapanimadhumita effectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT pritchardmark effectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT doddsrachel effectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT stevenssimonp effectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT thorpnicky effectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT taylorrogere effectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT wheatleykeith effectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT pizerbarry effectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT morrallmatthew effectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT phillipsrobert effectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT englishmartin effectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT kearnspamelar effectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT wilnesophie effectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview
AT wilsonjaynes effectivenessandsafetyofprotonbeamradiationtherapyinchildrenwithmalignantcentralnervoussystemcnstumoursprotocolforasystematicreview