Cargando…

A systematic review of community-based interventions for emerging zoonotic infectious diseases in Southeast Asia

BACKGROUND: Southeast Asia has been at the epicentre of recent epidemics of emerging and re-emerging zoonotic diseases. Community-based surveillance and control interventions have been heavily promoted but the most effective interventions have not been identified. OBJECTIVES: This review evaluated e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halton, Kate, Sarna, Mohinder, Barnett, Adrian, Leonardo, Lydia, Graves, Nicholas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4962925/
http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2013-801
_version_ 1782444886653403136
author Halton, Kate
Sarna, Mohinder
Barnett, Adrian
Leonardo, Lydia
Graves, Nicholas
author_facet Halton, Kate
Sarna, Mohinder
Barnett, Adrian
Leonardo, Lydia
Graves, Nicholas
author_sort Halton, Kate
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Southeast Asia has been at the epicentre of recent epidemics of emerging and re-emerging zoonotic diseases. Community-based surveillance and control interventions have been heavily promoted but the most effective interventions have not been identified. OBJECTIVES: This review evaluated evidence for the effectiveness of community-based surveillance interventions at monitoring and identifying emerging infectious disease; the effectiveness of community-based control interventions at reducing rates of emerging infectious disease; and contextual factors that influence intervention effectiveness. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Participants Communities in Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Viet Nam. Types of intervention(s) Non-pharmaceutical, non-vaccine, and community-based surveillance or prevention and control interventions targeting rabies, Nipah virus, dengue, SARS or avian influenza. Types of outcomes Primary outcomes: measures: of infection or disease; secondary outcomes: measures of intervention function. Types of studies Original quantitative studies published in English. SEARCH STRATEGY: Databases searched (1980 to 2011): PubMed, CINAHL, ProQuest, EBSCOhost, Web of Science, Science Direct, Cochrane database of systematic reviews, WHOLIS, British Development Library, LILACS, World Bank (East Asia), Asian Development Bank. METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY: Two independent reviewers critically appraised studies using standard Joanna Briggs Institute instruments. Disagreements were resolved through discussion. DATA EXTRACTION: A customised tool was used to extract quantitative data on intervention(s), populations, study methods, and primary and secondary outcomes; and qualitative contextual information or narrative evidence about interventions. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data was synthesised in a narrative summary with the aid of tables. Meta-analysis was used to statistically pool quantitative results. RESULTS: Fifty-seven studies were included. Vector control interventions using copepods, environmental cleanup and education are effective and sustainable at reducing dengue in rural and urban communities, whilst insecticide spraying is effective in urban outbreak situations. Community-based surveillance interventions can effectively identify avian influenza in backyard flocks, but have not been broadly applied. Outbreak control interventions for Nipah virus and SARS are effective but may not be suitable for ongoing control. Canine vaccination and education is more acceptable than culling, but still fails to reach coverage levels required to effectively control rabies. Contextual factors were identified that influence community engagement with, and ultimately effectiveness of, interventions. CONCLUSION: Despite investment in community-based disease control and surveillance in Southeast Asia, published evidence evaluating interventions is limited in quantity and quality. Nonetheless this review identified a number of effective interventions, and several contextual factors influencing effectiveness. Identification of the best programs will require comparative evidence of effectiveness acceptability, cost-effectiveness and sustainability. Implications for practice Interventions are more effective if there are high levels of community ownership and engagement. Linkages between veterinary and public health surveillance systems are essential. Interventions are not well accepted when they fail to acknowledge the importance of animals for economic activity in communities. Implications for research Evidence is needed on functioning and outcomes of current surveillance systems and novel low-cost methods of surveillance. Evaluations of control interventions should control for confounding and report measures of disease, cost and sustainability. Translational research is needed to assess generalisability and evaluate roll-out of effective interventions as regional or national programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4962925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49629252016-08-14 A systematic review of community-based interventions for emerging zoonotic infectious diseases in Southeast Asia Halton, Kate Sarna, Mohinder Barnett, Adrian Leonardo, Lydia Graves, Nicholas JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Southeast Asia has been at the epicentre of recent epidemics of emerging and re-emerging zoonotic diseases. Community-based surveillance and control interventions have been heavily promoted but the most effective interventions have not been identified. OBJECTIVES: This review evaluated evidence for the effectiveness of community-based surveillance interventions at monitoring and identifying emerging infectious disease; the effectiveness of community-based control interventions at reducing rates of emerging infectious disease; and contextual factors that influence intervention effectiveness. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Participants Communities in Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Viet Nam. Types of intervention(s) Non-pharmaceutical, non-vaccine, and community-based surveillance or prevention and control interventions targeting rabies, Nipah virus, dengue, SARS or avian influenza. Types of outcomes Primary outcomes: measures: of infection or disease; secondary outcomes: measures of intervention function. Types of studies Original quantitative studies published in English. SEARCH STRATEGY: Databases searched (1980 to 2011): PubMed, CINAHL, ProQuest, EBSCOhost, Web of Science, Science Direct, Cochrane database of systematic reviews, WHOLIS, British Development Library, LILACS, World Bank (East Asia), Asian Development Bank. METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY: Two independent reviewers critically appraised studies using standard Joanna Briggs Institute instruments. Disagreements were resolved through discussion. DATA EXTRACTION: A customised tool was used to extract quantitative data on intervention(s), populations, study methods, and primary and secondary outcomes; and qualitative contextual information or narrative evidence about interventions. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data was synthesised in a narrative summary with the aid of tables. Meta-analysis was used to statistically pool quantitative results. RESULTS: Fifty-seven studies were included. Vector control interventions using copepods, environmental cleanup and education are effective and sustainable at reducing dengue in rural and urban communities, whilst insecticide spraying is effective in urban outbreak situations. Community-based surveillance interventions can effectively identify avian influenza in backyard flocks, but have not been broadly applied. Outbreak control interventions for Nipah virus and SARS are effective but may not be suitable for ongoing control. Canine vaccination and education is more acceptable than culling, but still fails to reach coverage levels required to effectively control rabies. Contextual factors were identified that influence community engagement with, and ultimately effectiveness of, interventions. CONCLUSION: Despite investment in community-based disease control and surveillance in Southeast Asia, published evidence evaluating interventions is limited in quantity and quality. Nonetheless this review identified a number of effective interventions, and several contextual factors influencing effectiveness. Identification of the best programs will require comparative evidence of effectiveness acceptability, cost-effectiveness and sustainability. Implications for practice Interventions are more effective if there are high levels of community ownership and engagement. Linkages between veterinary and public health surveillance systems are essential. Interventions are not well accepted when they fail to acknowledge the importance of animals for economic activity in communities. Implications for research Evidence is needed on functioning and outcomes of current surveillance systems and novel low-cost methods of surveillance. Evaluations of control interventions should control for confounding and report measures of disease, cost and sustainability. Translational research is needed to assess generalisability and evaluate roll-out of effective interventions as regional or national programs. Wolters Kluwer 2013-02 2013-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4962925/ http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2013-801 Text en © the authors 2013
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Halton, Kate
Sarna, Mohinder
Barnett, Adrian
Leonardo, Lydia
Graves, Nicholas
A systematic review of community-based interventions for emerging zoonotic infectious diseases in Southeast Asia
title A systematic review of community-based interventions for emerging zoonotic infectious diseases in Southeast Asia
title_full A systematic review of community-based interventions for emerging zoonotic infectious diseases in Southeast Asia
title_fullStr A systematic review of community-based interventions for emerging zoonotic infectious diseases in Southeast Asia
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of community-based interventions for emerging zoonotic infectious diseases in Southeast Asia
title_short A systematic review of community-based interventions for emerging zoonotic infectious diseases in Southeast Asia
title_sort systematic review of community-based interventions for emerging zoonotic infectious diseases in southeast asia
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4962925/
http://dx.doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2013-801
work_keys_str_mv AT haltonkate asystematicreviewofcommunitybasedinterventionsforemergingzoonoticinfectiousdiseasesinsoutheastasia
AT sarnamohinder asystematicreviewofcommunitybasedinterventionsforemergingzoonoticinfectiousdiseasesinsoutheastasia
AT barnettadrian asystematicreviewofcommunitybasedinterventionsforemergingzoonoticinfectiousdiseasesinsoutheastasia
AT leonardolydia asystematicreviewofcommunitybasedinterventionsforemergingzoonoticinfectiousdiseasesinsoutheastasia
AT gravesnicholas asystematicreviewofcommunitybasedinterventionsforemergingzoonoticinfectiousdiseasesinsoutheastasia
AT haltonkate systematicreviewofcommunitybasedinterventionsforemergingzoonoticinfectiousdiseasesinsoutheastasia
AT sarnamohinder systematicreviewofcommunitybasedinterventionsforemergingzoonoticinfectiousdiseasesinsoutheastasia
AT barnettadrian systematicreviewofcommunitybasedinterventionsforemergingzoonoticinfectiousdiseasesinsoutheastasia
AT leonardolydia systematicreviewofcommunitybasedinterventionsforemergingzoonoticinfectiousdiseasesinsoutheastasia
AT gravesnicholas systematicreviewofcommunitybasedinterventionsforemergingzoonoticinfectiousdiseasesinsoutheastasia