Cargando…

We Made Your Bed, Why Won’t You Lie in It? Food Availability and Disease May Affect Reproductive Output of Reintroduced Frogs

Mitigation to offset the impacts of land development is becoming increasingly common, with reintroductions and created habitat programs used as key actions. However, numerous reviews cite high rates of poor success from these programs, and a need for improved monitoring and scientific testing to eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klop-Toker, Kaya, Valdez, Jose, Stockwell, Michelle, Fardell, Loren, Clulow, Simon, Clulow, John, Mahony, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4963099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27463095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159143
_version_ 1782444907184521216
author Klop-Toker, Kaya
Valdez, Jose
Stockwell, Michelle
Fardell, Loren
Clulow, Simon
Clulow, John
Mahony, Michael
author_facet Klop-Toker, Kaya
Valdez, Jose
Stockwell, Michelle
Fardell, Loren
Clulow, Simon
Clulow, John
Mahony, Michael
author_sort Klop-Toker, Kaya
collection PubMed
description Mitigation to offset the impacts of land development is becoming increasingly common, with reintroductions and created habitat programs used as key actions. However, numerous reviews cite high rates of poor success from these programs, and a need for improved monitoring and scientific testing to evaluate outcomes and improve management actions. We conducted extensive monitoring of a released population of endangered green and golden bell frogs, Litoria aurea, within a created habitat, as well as complementary surveys of a surrounding wild population. We then compared differences between the created habitat and natural ponds where extant frogs either bred or didn’t breed in order to determine factors that contributed to the breeding failure within the created habitat. We evaluated differences of L. aurea abundance, abundance of other fauna, vegetation, water quality, habitat structure, invasive fish, and disease between the three pond types (created habitat, breeding ponds, non-breeding ponds). We discovered that vegetation and invertebrate diversity were low within the created habitat, potentially reducing energy and nutritional resources required for breeding. Also, a greater proportion of frogs in the created habitat were carrying the chytrid fungal pathogen, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, compared to the wild populations. In addition to causing the potentially fatal disease, chytridiomycosis, this pathogen has been shown to reduce reproductive functioning in male L. aurea, and subsequently may have reduced reproductive activities in the created habitat. Conspecific attraction, pond hydrology, and aquatic vegetation may also have had some influence on breeding behaviours, whilst the presence of the invasive mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki, and heterospecific tadpoles were unlikely to have deterred L. aurea from breeding within the created habitat. Through the use of scientific testing and monitoring, this study is able to make recommendations for future amphibian breed and release programs, and suggests planting a diversity of plant species to attract invertebrates, creating some permanent ponds, connecting habitat with existing populations, trialling artificial mating calls, and following recommendations to reduce the prevalence of disease within the population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4963099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49630992016-08-08 We Made Your Bed, Why Won’t You Lie in It? Food Availability and Disease May Affect Reproductive Output of Reintroduced Frogs Klop-Toker, Kaya Valdez, Jose Stockwell, Michelle Fardell, Loren Clulow, Simon Clulow, John Mahony, Michael PLoS One Research Article Mitigation to offset the impacts of land development is becoming increasingly common, with reintroductions and created habitat programs used as key actions. However, numerous reviews cite high rates of poor success from these programs, and a need for improved monitoring and scientific testing to evaluate outcomes and improve management actions. We conducted extensive monitoring of a released population of endangered green and golden bell frogs, Litoria aurea, within a created habitat, as well as complementary surveys of a surrounding wild population. We then compared differences between the created habitat and natural ponds where extant frogs either bred or didn’t breed in order to determine factors that contributed to the breeding failure within the created habitat. We evaluated differences of L. aurea abundance, abundance of other fauna, vegetation, water quality, habitat structure, invasive fish, and disease between the three pond types (created habitat, breeding ponds, non-breeding ponds). We discovered that vegetation and invertebrate diversity were low within the created habitat, potentially reducing energy and nutritional resources required for breeding. Also, a greater proportion of frogs in the created habitat were carrying the chytrid fungal pathogen, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, compared to the wild populations. In addition to causing the potentially fatal disease, chytridiomycosis, this pathogen has been shown to reduce reproductive functioning in male L. aurea, and subsequently may have reduced reproductive activities in the created habitat. Conspecific attraction, pond hydrology, and aquatic vegetation may also have had some influence on breeding behaviours, whilst the presence of the invasive mosquitofish, Gambusia holbrooki, and heterospecific tadpoles were unlikely to have deterred L. aurea from breeding within the created habitat. Through the use of scientific testing and monitoring, this study is able to make recommendations for future amphibian breed and release programs, and suggests planting a diversity of plant species to attract invertebrates, creating some permanent ponds, connecting habitat with existing populations, trialling artificial mating calls, and following recommendations to reduce the prevalence of disease within the population. Public Library of Science 2016-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4963099/ /pubmed/27463095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159143 Text en © 2016 Klop-Toker et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Klop-Toker, Kaya
Valdez, Jose
Stockwell, Michelle
Fardell, Loren
Clulow, Simon
Clulow, John
Mahony, Michael
We Made Your Bed, Why Won’t You Lie in It? Food Availability and Disease May Affect Reproductive Output of Reintroduced Frogs
title We Made Your Bed, Why Won’t You Lie in It? Food Availability and Disease May Affect Reproductive Output of Reintroduced Frogs
title_full We Made Your Bed, Why Won’t You Lie in It? Food Availability and Disease May Affect Reproductive Output of Reintroduced Frogs
title_fullStr We Made Your Bed, Why Won’t You Lie in It? Food Availability and Disease May Affect Reproductive Output of Reintroduced Frogs
title_full_unstemmed We Made Your Bed, Why Won’t You Lie in It? Food Availability and Disease May Affect Reproductive Output of Reintroduced Frogs
title_short We Made Your Bed, Why Won’t You Lie in It? Food Availability and Disease May Affect Reproductive Output of Reintroduced Frogs
title_sort we made your bed, why won’t you lie in it? food availability and disease may affect reproductive output of reintroduced frogs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4963099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27463095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159143
work_keys_str_mv AT kloptokerkaya wemadeyourbedwhywontyoulieinitfoodavailabilityanddiseasemayaffectreproductiveoutputofreintroducedfrogs
AT valdezjose wemadeyourbedwhywontyoulieinitfoodavailabilityanddiseasemayaffectreproductiveoutputofreintroducedfrogs
AT stockwellmichelle wemadeyourbedwhywontyoulieinitfoodavailabilityanddiseasemayaffectreproductiveoutputofreintroducedfrogs
AT fardellloren wemadeyourbedwhywontyoulieinitfoodavailabilityanddiseasemayaffectreproductiveoutputofreintroducedfrogs
AT clulowsimon wemadeyourbedwhywontyoulieinitfoodavailabilityanddiseasemayaffectreproductiveoutputofreintroducedfrogs
AT clulowjohn wemadeyourbedwhywontyoulieinitfoodavailabilityanddiseasemayaffectreproductiveoutputofreintroducedfrogs
AT mahonymichael wemadeyourbedwhywontyoulieinitfoodavailabilityanddiseasemayaffectreproductiveoutputofreintroducedfrogs