Cargando…

Statistical Analysis for Subjective and Objective Evaluations of Dental Drill Sounds

The sound produced by a dental air turbine handpiece (dental drill) can markedly influence the sound environment in a dental clinic. Indeed, many patients report that the sound of a dental drill elicits an unpleasant feeling. Although several manufacturers have attempted to reduce the sound pressure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamada, Tomomi, Kuwano, Sonoko, Ebisu, Shigeyuki, Hayashi, Mikako
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4963103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27462903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159926
_version_ 1782444908103073792
author Yamada, Tomomi
Kuwano, Sonoko
Ebisu, Shigeyuki
Hayashi, Mikako
author_facet Yamada, Tomomi
Kuwano, Sonoko
Ebisu, Shigeyuki
Hayashi, Mikako
author_sort Yamada, Tomomi
collection PubMed
description The sound produced by a dental air turbine handpiece (dental drill) can markedly influence the sound environment in a dental clinic. Indeed, many patients report that the sound of a dental drill elicits an unpleasant feeling. Although several manufacturers have attempted to reduce the sound pressure levels produced by dental drills during idling based on ISO 14457, the sound emitted by such drills under active drilling conditions may negatively influence the dental clinic sound environment. The physical metrics related to the unpleasant impressions associated with dental drill sounds have not been determined. In the present study, psychological measurements of dental drill sounds were conducted with the aim of facilitating improvement of the sound environment at dental clinics. Specifically, we examined the impressions elicited by the sounds of 12 types of dental drills in idling and drilling conditions using a semantic differential. The analysis revealed that the impressions of dental drill sounds varied considerably between idling and drilling conditions and among the examined drills. This finding suggests that measuring the sound of a dental drill in idling conditions alone may be insufficient for evaluating the effects of the sound. We related the results of the psychological evaluations to those of measurements of the physical metrics of equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure levels (L(Aeq)) and sharpness. Factor analysis indicated that impressions of the dental drill sounds consisted of two factors: “metallic and unpleasant” and “powerful”. L(Aeq) had a strong relationship with “powerful impression”, calculated sharpness was positively related to “metallic impression”, and “unpleasant impression” was predicted by the combination of both L(Aeq) and calculated sharpness. The present analyses indicate that, in addition to a reduction in sound pressure level, refining the frequency components of dental drill sounds is important for creating a comfortable sound environment in dental clinics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4963103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49631032016-08-08 Statistical Analysis for Subjective and Objective Evaluations of Dental Drill Sounds Yamada, Tomomi Kuwano, Sonoko Ebisu, Shigeyuki Hayashi, Mikako PLoS One Research Article The sound produced by a dental air turbine handpiece (dental drill) can markedly influence the sound environment in a dental clinic. Indeed, many patients report that the sound of a dental drill elicits an unpleasant feeling. Although several manufacturers have attempted to reduce the sound pressure levels produced by dental drills during idling based on ISO 14457, the sound emitted by such drills under active drilling conditions may negatively influence the dental clinic sound environment. The physical metrics related to the unpleasant impressions associated with dental drill sounds have not been determined. In the present study, psychological measurements of dental drill sounds were conducted with the aim of facilitating improvement of the sound environment at dental clinics. Specifically, we examined the impressions elicited by the sounds of 12 types of dental drills in idling and drilling conditions using a semantic differential. The analysis revealed that the impressions of dental drill sounds varied considerably between idling and drilling conditions and among the examined drills. This finding suggests that measuring the sound of a dental drill in idling conditions alone may be insufficient for evaluating the effects of the sound. We related the results of the psychological evaluations to those of measurements of the physical metrics of equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure levels (L(Aeq)) and sharpness. Factor analysis indicated that impressions of the dental drill sounds consisted of two factors: “metallic and unpleasant” and “powerful”. L(Aeq) had a strong relationship with “powerful impression”, calculated sharpness was positively related to “metallic impression”, and “unpleasant impression” was predicted by the combination of both L(Aeq) and calculated sharpness. The present analyses indicate that, in addition to a reduction in sound pressure level, refining the frequency components of dental drill sounds is important for creating a comfortable sound environment in dental clinics. Public Library of Science 2016-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4963103/ /pubmed/27462903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159926 Text en © 2016 Yamada et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yamada, Tomomi
Kuwano, Sonoko
Ebisu, Shigeyuki
Hayashi, Mikako
Statistical Analysis for Subjective and Objective Evaluations of Dental Drill Sounds
title Statistical Analysis for Subjective and Objective Evaluations of Dental Drill Sounds
title_full Statistical Analysis for Subjective and Objective Evaluations of Dental Drill Sounds
title_fullStr Statistical Analysis for Subjective and Objective Evaluations of Dental Drill Sounds
title_full_unstemmed Statistical Analysis for Subjective and Objective Evaluations of Dental Drill Sounds
title_short Statistical Analysis for Subjective and Objective Evaluations of Dental Drill Sounds
title_sort statistical analysis for subjective and objective evaluations of dental drill sounds
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4963103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27462903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159926
work_keys_str_mv AT yamadatomomi statisticalanalysisforsubjectiveandobjectiveevaluationsofdentaldrillsounds
AT kuwanosonoko statisticalanalysisforsubjectiveandobjectiveevaluationsofdentaldrillsounds
AT ebisushigeyuki statisticalanalysisforsubjectiveandobjectiveevaluationsofdentaldrillsounds
AT hayashimikako statisticalanalysisforsubjectiveandobjectiveevaluationsofdentaldrillsounds