Cargando…

Novel Transabdominal Motor Action Potential (TaMAP) Neuromonitoring System for Spinal Surgery

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) approaches to the lumbar spine reduce patient morbidity compared to anterior or posterior alternatives. This approach, however, decreases direct anatomical visualization, creating the need for highly sensitive and specific neuro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoshide, Reid, Feldman, Erica, Gabel, Brandon C, Taylor, Natalie, Gharib, James, Lee, Yu-Po, Taylor, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4963228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27489748
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.655
_version_ 1782444931195863040
author Hoshide, Reid
Feldman, Erica
Gabel, Brandon C
Taylor, Natalie
Gharib, James
Lee, Yu-Po
Taylor, William
author_facet Hoshide, Reid
Feldman, Erica
Gabel, Brandon C
Taylor, Natalie
Gharib, James
Lee, Yu-Po
Taylor, William
author_sort Hoshide, Reid
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) approaches to the lumbar spine reduce patient morbidity compared to anterior or posterior alternatives. This approach, however, decreases direct anatomical visualization, creating the need for highly sensitive and specific neurophysiological monitoring. We seek to determine feasibility in 'transabdominal motor action potential (TaMAP)' monitoring as an assessment for the integrity of the neural elements during lateral-approach surgeries to the lumbar spine.  METHODS: Cathode and anode leads were placed on the posterior and anterior surfaces of two porcine subjects. Currents of varying degrees were transmitted across, from front to back. Motor responses were monitored and recorded by needle electrodes in specific distal muscle groups of the lower extremity. Lastly, the cathode and anode were placed anterior and posterior to the chest wall and stimulated to the maximum of 1500 mA to determine any effect on cardiac rhythm. RESULTS: Responses were seen by measuring vertical height differences between peaks of corresponding evoked potentials. Recruitment began at 200 mA in the lower extremities. Stimulation at 450 mA recruited a reliable and distinguishable electrographic response from most muscle groups. Responses were recorded and reliably measured and increased in proportion to the graduation of transabdominal stimulation current; no responses were seen in the arms or face. 1500 mA across the chest wall failed to stimulate or induce cardiac arrhythmia on repeated stimulation, indicating safety of stimulation. CONCLUSION: TaMAPs seen in the animal model provide a potential alternative to standard transcranial motor evoked potentials done in the lateral approach of LLIFs. TaMAP recordings in most muscle groups were recordable and reliable, though some muscle groups failed to stimulate. Safety of transabdominal motor evoked potentials was confirmed in this porcine study. Future studies should examine TaMAPs reliability in detecting compressive lesions of nerve roots and peripheral nerves.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4963228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49632282016-08-03 Novel Transabdominal Motor Action Potential (TaMAP) Neuromonitoring System for Spinal Surgery Hoshide, Reid Feldman, Erica Gabel, Brandon C Taylor, Natalie Gharib, James Lee, Yu-Po Taylor, William Cureus Orthopedics INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) approaches to the lumbar spine reduce patient morbidity compared to anterior or posterior alternatives. This approach, however, decreases direct anatomical visualization, creating the need for highly sensitive and specific neurophysiological monitoring. We seek to determine feasibility in 'transabdominal motor action potential (TaMAP)' monitoring as an assessment for the integrity of the neural elements during lateral-approach surgeries to the lumbar spine.  METHODS: Cathode and anode leads were placed on the posterior and anterior surfaces of two porcine subjects. Currents of varying degrees were transmitted across, from front to back. Motor responses were monitored and recorded by needle electrodes in specific distal muscle groups of the lower extremity. Lastly, the cathode and anode were placed anterior and posterior to the chest wall and stimulated to the maximum of 1500 mA to determine any effect on cardiac rhythm. RESULTS: Responses were seen by measuring vertical height differences between peaks of corresponding evoked potentials. Recruitment began at 200 mA in the lower extremities. Stimulation at 450 mA recruited a reliable and distinguishable electrographic response from most muscle groups. Responses were recorded and reliably measured and increased in proportion to the graduation of transabdominal stimulation current; no responses were seen in the arms or face. 1500 mA across the chest wall failed to stimulate or induce cardiac arrhythmia on repeated stimulation, indicating safety of stimulation. CONCLUSION: TaMAPs seen in the animal model provide a potential alternative to standard transcranial motor evoked potentials done in the lateral approach of LLIFs. TaMAP recordings in most muscle groups were recordable and reliable, though some muscle groups failed to stimulate. Safety of transabdominal motor evoked potentials was confirmed in this porcine study. Future studies should examine TaMAPs reliability in detecting compressive lesions of nerve roots and peripheral nerves. Cureus 2016-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4963228/ /pubmed/27489748 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.655 Text en Copyright © 2016, Hoshide et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Hoshide, Reid
Feldman, Erica
Gabel, Brandon C
Taylor, Natalie
Gharib, James
Lee, Yu-Po
Taylor, William
Novel Transabdominal Motor Action Potential (TaMAP) Neuromonitoring System for Spinal Surgery
title Novel Transabdominal Motor Action Potential (TaMAP) Neuromonitoring System for Spinal Surgery
title_full Novel Transabdominal Motor Action Potential (TaMAP) Neuromonitoring System for Spinal Surgery
title_fullStr Novel Transabdominal Motor Action Potential (TaMAP) Neuromonitoring System for Spinal Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Novel Transabdominal Motor Action Potential (TaMAP) Neuromonitoring System for Spinal Surgery
title_short Novel Transabdominal Motor Action Potential (TaMAP) Neuromonitoring System for Spinal Surgery
title_sort novel transabdominal motor action potential (tamap) neuromonitoring system for spinal surgery
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4963228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27489748
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.655
work_keys_str_mv AT hoshidereid noveltransabdominalmotoractionpotentialtamapneuromonitoringsystemforspinalsurgery
AT feldmanerica noveltransabdominalmotoractionpotentialtamapneuromonitoringsystemforspinalsurgery
AT gabelbrandonc noveltransabdominalmotoractionpotentialtamapneuromonitoringsystemforspinalsurgery
AT taylornatalie noveltransabdominalmotoractionpotentialtamapneuromonitoringsystemforspinalsurgery
AT gharibjames noveltransabdominalmotoractionpotentialtamapneuromonitoringsystemforspinalsurgery
AT leeyupo noveltransabdominalmotoractionpotentialtamapneuromonitoringsystemforspinalsurgery
AT taylorwilliam noveltransabdominalmotoractionpotentialtamapneuromonitoringsystemforspinalsurgery