Cargando…
Development of a core outcome set for use in determining the overall success of gastroschisis treatment
BACKGROUND: Gastroschisis research is limited in quality by the presence of significant heterogeneity in outcome measure reporting (PloS One 10(1):e0116908, 2015). Using core outcome sets in research is one proposed method for addressing this problem (Trials 13:103, 2012; Clin Rheumatol 33(9):1313-1...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4964000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27465672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1453-7 |
_version_ | 1782445024362889216 |
---|---|
author | Allin, Benjamin Ross, Andrew Marven, Sean J Hall, Nigel Knight, Marian |
author_facet | Allin, Benjamin Ross, Andrew Marven, Sean J Hall, Nigel Knight, Marian |
author_sort | Allin, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gastroschisis research is limited in quality by the presence of significant heterogeneity in outcome measure reporting (PloS One 10(1):e0116908, 2015). Using core outcome sets in research is one proposed method for addressing this problem (Trials 13:103, 2012; Clin Rheumatol 33(9):1313-1322, 2014; Health Serv Res Policy 17(1):1-2, 2012). Ultimately, standardising outcome measure reporting will improve research quality and translate into improvements in patient care. METHODS/DESIGN: Candidate outcome measures have been identified through systematic reviews. These outcome measures will form the starting point for an online, three-phase Delphi process that will be carried out in parallel by three panels of experts. Panel 1 is a neonatal panel, panel 2 is a non-neonatal panel and panel 3 is a lay panel. In round 1, experts will be asked to score the previously identified outcome measures from 1–9 based on how important they think the measures are in determining the overall success of their/their child’s/their patient’s gastroschisis treatment. In round 2, experts will be presented with the same list of outcome measures and with graphical representations of how their panel scored that outcome in round 1. They will be asked to re-score the outcome measure taking into account how important other members of their panel felt it to be. In round 3, experts will again be asked to re-score each outcome measure, but this time they will receive a graphical representation of the distribution of scores from all three panels which they should take into account when re-scoring. Following round 3 of the Delphi process, 40 experts will be invited to attend a face-to-face consensus meeting. Participants will be invited in a purposive manner to obtain balance between the different panels. The results of the Delphi process will be discussed, and outcomes re-scored. Outcome measures where > 70 % of the participants at the meeting scored them as 7–9 and < 15 % scored them as 1–3 will form the core outcome set. DISCUSSION: Development of a core outcome set will help to reduce the heterogeneity of the outcome measure reporting in gastroschisis. This will increase the quality of research taking place and ultimately improve care provided to infants with gastroschisis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1453-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4964000 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49640002016-07-29 Development of a core outcome set for use in determining the overall success of gastroschisis treatment Allin, Benjamin Ross, Andrew Marven, Sean J Hall, Nigel Knight, Marian Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Gastroschisis research is limited in quality by the presence of significant heterogeneity in outcome measure reporting (PloS One 10(1):e0116908, 2015). Using core outcome sets in research is one proposed method for addressing this problem (Trials 13:103, 2012; Clin Rheumatol 33(9):1313-1322, 2014; Health Serv Res Policy 17(1):1-2, 2012). Ultimately, standardising outcome measure reporting will improve research quality and translate into improvements in patient care. METHODS/DESIGN: Candidate outcome measures have been identified through systematic reviews. These outcome measures will form the starting point for an online, three-phase Delphi process that will be carried out in parallel by three panels of experts. Panel 1 is a neonatal panel, panel 2 is a non-neonatal panel and panel 3 is a lay panel. In round 1, experts will be asked to score the previously identified outcome measures from 1–9 based on how important they think the measures are in determining the overall success of their/their child’s/their patient’s gastroschisis treatment. In round 2, experts will be presented with the same list of outcome measures and with graphical representations of how their panel scored that outcome in round 1. They will be asked to re-score the outcome measure taking into account how important other members of their panel felt it to be. In round 3, experts will again be asked to re-score each outcome measure, but this time they will receive a graphical representation of the distribution of scores from all three panels which they should take into account when re-scoring. Following round 3 of the Delphi process, 40 experts will be invited to attend a face-to-face consensus meeting. Participants will be invited in a purposive manner to obtain balance between the different panels. The results of the Delphi process will be discussed, and outcomes re-scored. Outcome measures where > 70 % of the participants at the meeting scored them as 7–9 and < 15 % scored them as 1–3 will form the core outcome set. DISCUSSION: Development of a core outcome set will help to reduce the heterogeneity of the outcome measure reporting in gastroschisis. This will increase the quality of research taking place and ultimately improve care provided to infants with gastroschisis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1453-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4964000/ /pubmed/27465672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1453-7 Text en © Allin et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Allin, Benjamin Ross, Andrew Marven, Sean J Hall, Nigel Knight, Marian Development of a core outcome set for use in determining the overall success of gastroschisis treatment |
title | Development of a core outcome set for use in determining the overall success of gastroschisis treatment |
title_full | Development of a core outcome set for use in determining the overall success of gastroschisis treatment |
title_fullStr | Development of a core outcome set for use in determining the overall success of gastroschisis treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a core outcome set for use in determining the overall success of gastroschisis treatment |
title_short | Development of a core outcome set for use in determining the overall success of gastroschisis treatment |
title_sort | development of a core outcome set for use in determining the overall success of gastroschisis treatment |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4964000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27465672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1453-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT allinbenjamin developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseindeterminingtheoverallsuccessofgastroschisistreatment AT rossandrew developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseindeterminingtheoverallsuccessofgastroschisistreatment AT marvensean developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseindeterminingtheoverallsuccessofgastroschisistreatment AT jhallnigel developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseindeterminingtheoverallsuccessofgastroschisistreatment AT knightmarian developmentofacoreoutcomesetforuseindeterminingtheoverallsuccessofgastroschisistreatment |