Cargando…

The influence of graphic warning labels on efficacy beliefs and risk perceptions: a qualitative study with low-income, urban smokers

BACKGROUND: Health communication theories indicate that messages depicting efficacy and threat might promote behavior change by enhancing individuals’ efficacy beliefs and risk perceptions, but this has received little attention in graphic warning label research. We explored low socioeconomic status...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mead, Erin L., Cohen, Joanna E., Kennedy, Caitlin E., Gallo, Joseph, Latkin, Carl A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4964038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27471440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12971-016-0088-5
_version_ 1782445032435875840
author Mead, Erin L.
Cohen, Joanna E.
Kennedy, Caitlin E.
Gallo, Joseph
Latkin, Carl A.
author_facet Mead, Erin L.
Cohen, Joanna E.
Kennedy, Caitlin E.
Gallo, Joseph
Latkin, Carl A.
author_sort Mead, Erin L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health communication theories indicate that messages depicting efficacy and threat might promote behavior change by enhancing individuals’ efficacy beliefs and risk perceptions, but this has received little attention in graphic warning label research. We explored low socioeconomic status (SES) smokers’ perceptions of theory-based graphic warning labels to inform the development of labels to promote smoking cessation. METHODS: Twelve graphic warning labels were developed with self-efficacy and response efficacy messages paired with messages portraying high, low, or no threat from smoking. Self-efficacy messages were designed to promote confidence in ability to quit, while response efficacy messages were designed to promote confidence in the ability of the Quitline to aid cessation. From January – February 2014, we conducted in-depth interviews with 25 low SES adult men and women smokers in Baltimore, Maryland, U.S. Participants discussed the labels’ role in their self-efficacy beliefs, response efficacy beliefs about the Quitline, and risk perceptions (including perceived severity of and susceptibility to disease). Data were analyzed through framework analysis, a type of thematic analysis. RESULTS: Efficacy messages in which participants vicariously experienced the characters’ quit successes were reported as most influential to self-efficacy beliefs. Labels portraying a high threat were reported as most influential to participants’ perceived severity of and susceptibility to smoking risks. Self-efficacy messages alone and paired with high threat were seen as most influential on self-efficacy beliefs. Labels portraying the threat from smoking were most motivational for calling the Quitline, followed by labels showing healthy role models who had successfully quit using the Quitline. CONCLUSIONS: Role model-based efficacy messages might enhance the effectiveness of labels by making smokers’ self-efficacy beliefs about quitting most salient and enhancing the perceived efficacy of the Quitline. Threatening messages play an important role in enhancing risk perceptions, but findings suggest that efficacy messages are also important in the impact of labels on beliefs and motivation. Our findings could aid in the development of labels to address smoking disparities among low SES populations in the U.S.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4964038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49640382016-07-29 The influence of graphic warning labels on efficacy beliefs and risk perceptions: a qualitative study with low-income, urban smokers Mead, Erin L. Cohen, Joanna E. Kennedy, Caitlin E. Gallo, Joseph Latkin, Carl A. Tob Induc Dis Research BACKGROUND: Health communication theories indicate that messages depicting efficacy and threat might promote behavior change by enhancing individuals’ efficacy beliefs and risk perceptions, but this has received little attention in graphic warning label research. We explored low socioeconomic status (SES) smokers’ perceptions of theory-based graphic warning labels to inform the development of labels to promote smoking cessation. METHODS: Twelve graphic warning labels were developed with self-efficacy and response efficacy messages paired with messages portraying high, low, or no threat from smoking. Self-efficacy messages were designed to promote confidence in ability to quit, while response efficacy messages were designed to promote confidence in the ability of the Quitline to aid cessation. From January – February 2014, we conducted in-depth interviews with 25 low SES adult men and women smokers in Baltimore, Maryland, U.S. Participants discussed the labels’ role in their self-efficacy beliefs, response efficacy beliefs about the Quitline, and risk perceptions (including perceived severity of and susceptibility to disease). Data were analyzed through framework analysis, a type of thematic analysis. RESULTS: Efficacy messages in which participants vicariously experienced the characters’ quit successes were reported as most influential to self-efficacy beliefs. Labels portraying a high threat were reported as most influential to participants’ perceived severity of and susceptibility to smoking risks. Self-efficacy messages alone and paired with high threat were seen as most influential on self-efficacy beliefs. Labels portraying the threat from smoking were most motivational for calling the Quitline, followed by labels showing healthy role models who had successfully quit using the Quitline. CONCLUSIONS: Role model-based efficacy messages might enhance the effectiveness of labels by making smokers’ self-efficacy beliefs about quitting most salient and enhancing the perceived efficacy of the Quitline. Threatening messages play an important role in enhancing risk perceptions, but findings suggest that efficacy messages are also important in the impact of labels on beliefs and motivation. Our findings could aid in the development of labels to address smoking disparities among low SES populations in the U.S. BioMed Central 2016-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4964038/ /pubmed/27471440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12971-016-0088-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Mead, Erin L.
Cohen, Joanna E.
Kennedy, Caitlin E.
Gallo, Joseph
Latkin, Carl A.
The influence of graphic warning labels on efficacy beliefs and risk perceptions: a qualitative study with low-income, urban smokers
title The influence of graphic warning labels on efficacy beliefs and risk perceptions: a qualitative study with low-income, urban smokers
title_full The influence of graphic warning labels on efficacy beliefs and risk perceptions: a qualitative study with low-income, urban smokers
title_fullStr The influence of graphic warning labels on efficacy beliefs and risk perceptions: a qualitative study with low-income, urban smokers
title_full_unstemmed The influence of graphic warning labels on efficacy beliefs and risk perceptions: a qualitative study with low-income, urban smokers
title_short The influence of graphic warning labels on efficacy beliefs and risk perceptions: a qualitative study with low-income, urban smokers
title_sort influence of graphic warning labels on efficacy beliefs and risk perceptions: a qualitative study with low-income, urban smokers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4964038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27471440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12971-016-0088-5
work_keys_str_mv AT meaderinl theinfluenceofgraphicwarninglabelsonefficacybeliefsandriskperceptionsaqualitativestudywithlowincomeurbansmokers
AT cohenjoannae theinfluenceofgraphicwarninglabelsonefficacybeliefsandriskperceptionsaqualitativestudywithlowincomeurbansmokers
AT kennedycaitline theinfluenceofgraphicwarninglabelsonefficacybeliefsandriskperceptionsaqualitativestudywithlowincomeurbansmokers
AT gallojoseph theinfluenceofgraphicwarninglabelsonefficacybeliefsandriskperceptionsaqualitativestudywithlowincomeurbansmokers
AT latkincarla theinfluenceofgraphicwarninglabelsonefficacybeliefsandriskperceptionsaqualitativestudywithlowincomeurbansmokers
AT meaderinl influenceofgraphicwarninglabelsonefficacybeliefsandriskperceptionsaqualitativestudywithlowincomeurbansmokers
AT cohenjoannae influenceofgraphicwarninglabelsonefficacybeliefsandriskperceptionsaqualitativestudywithlowincomeurbansmokers
AT kennedycaitline influenceofgraphicwarninglabelsonefficacybeliefsandriskperceptionsaqualitativestudywithlowincomeurbansmokers
AT gallojoseph influenceofgraphicwarninglabelsonefficacybeliefsandriskperceptionsaqualitativestudywithlowincomeurbansmokers
AT latkincarla influenceofgraphicwarninglabelsonefficacybeliefsandriskperceptionsaqualitativestudywithlowincomeurbansmokers