Cargando…
A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements
BACKGROUND: Problematic scarring remains a challenging aspect to address in the treatment of burns and can significantly affect the quality of life of the burn survivor. At present, there are few treatments available in the clinic to control adverse scarring, but experimental pharmacological anti-sc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4964074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27574684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41038-016-0036-x |
_version_ | 1782445040582262784 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Kwang Chear Dretzke, Janine Grover, Liam Logan, Ann Moiemen, Naiem |
author_facet | Lee, Kwang Chear Dretzke, Janine Grover, Liam Logan, Ann Moiemen, Naiem |
author_sort | Lee, Kwang Chear |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Problematic scarring remains a challenging aspect to address in the treatment of burns and can significantly affect the quality of life of the burn survivor. At present, there are few treatments available in the clinic to control adverse scarring, but experimental pharmacological anti-scarring strategies are now beginning to emerge. Their comparative success must be based on objective measurements of scarring, yet currently the clinical assessment of scars is not carried out systematically and is mostly based on subjective review of patients. However, several techniques and devices are being introduced that allow objective analysis of the burn scar. The aim of this article is to evaluate various objective measurement tools currently available and recommend a useful panel that is suitable for use in clinical trials of anti-scarring therapies. METHODS: A systematic literature search was done using the Web of Science, PubMed and Cochrane databases. The identified devices were then classified and grouped according to the parameters they measured. The tools were then compared and assessed in terms of inter- and intra-rater reproducibility, ease of use and cost. RESULTS: After duplicates were removed, 5062 articles were obtained in the search. After further screening, 157 articles which utilised objective burn scar measurement systems or tools were obtained. The scar measurement devices can be broadly classified into those measuring colour, metric variables, texture, biomechanical properties and pathophysiological disturbances. CONCLUSIONS: Objective scar measurement tools allow the accurate and reproducible evaluation of scars, which is important for both clinical and scientific use. However, studies to evaluate their relative performance and merits of these tools are scarce, and there remain factors, such as itch and pain, which cannot be measured objectively. On reviewing the available evidence, a panel of devices for objective scar measurement is recommended consisting of the 3D cameras (Eykona/Lifeviz/Vectra H1) for surface area and volume, DSM II colorimeter for colour, Dermascan high-frequency ultrasound for scar thickness and Cutometer for skin elasticity and pliability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4964074 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49640742016-08-29 A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements Lee, Kwang Chear Dretzke, Janine Grover, Liam Logan, Ann Moiemen, Naiem Burns Trauma Research Article BACKGROUND: Problematic scarring remains a challenging aspect to address in the treatment of burns and can significantly affect the quality of life of the burn survivor. At present, there are few treatments available in the clinic to control adverse scarring, but experimental pharmacological anti-scarring strategies are now beginning to emerge. Their comparative success must be based on objective measurements of scarring, yet currently the clinical assessment of scars is not carried out systematically and is mostly based on subjective review of patients. However, several techniques and devices are being introduced that allow objective analysis of the burn scar. The aim of this article is to evaluate various objective measurement tools currently available and recommend a useful panel that is suitable for use in clinical trials of anti-scarring therapies. METHODS: A systematic literature search was done using the Web of Science, PubMed and Cochrane databases. The identified devices were then classified and grouped according to the parameters they measured. The tools were then compared and assessed in terms of inter- and intra-rater reproducibility, ease of use and cost. RESULTS: After duplicates were removed, 5062 articles were obtained in the search. After further screening, 157 articles which utilised objective burn scar measurement systems or tools were obtained. The scar measurement devices can be broadly classified into those measuring colour, metric variables, texture, biomechanical properties and pathophysiological disturbances. CONCLUSIONS: Objective scar measurement tools allow the accurate and reproducible evaluation of scars, which is important for both clinical and scientific use. However, studies to evaluate their relative performance and merits of these tools are scarce, and there remain factors, such as itch and pain, which cannot be measured objectively. On reviewing the available evidence, a panel of devices for objective scar measurement is recommended consisting of the 3D cameras (Eykona/Lifeviz/Vectra H1) for surface area and volume, DSM II colorimeter for colour, Dermascan high-frequency ultrasound for scar thickness and Cutometer for skin elasticity and pliability. BioMed Central 2016-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4964074/ /pubmed/27574684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41038-016-0036-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lee, Kwang Chear Dretzke, Janine Grover, Liam Logan, Ann Moiemen, Naiem A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements |
title | A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements |
title_full | A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements |
title_fullStr | A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements |
title_short | A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements |
title_sort | systematic review of objective burn scar measurements |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4964074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27574684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41038-016-0036-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leekwangchear asystematicreviewofobjectiveburnscarmeasurements AT dretzkejanine asystematicreviewofobjectiveburnscarmeasurements AT groverliam asystematicreviewofobjectiveburnscarmeasurements AT loganann asystematicreviewofobjectiveburnscarmeasurements AT moiemennaiem asystematicreviewofobjectiveburnscarmeasurements AT leekwangchear systematicreviewofobjectiveburnscarmeasurements AT dretzkejanine systematicreviewofobjectiveburnscarmeasurements AT groverliam systematicreviewofobjectiveburnscarmeasurements AT loganann systematicreviewofobjectiveburnscarmeasurements AT moiemennaiem systematicreviewofobjectiveburnscarmeasurements |