Cargando…
Red eyes and red-flags: improving ophthalmic assessment and referral in primary care
Up to five percent of primary care consultations are eye-related, yet 96% of General Practitioners (GPs) do not undergo postgraduate ophthalmology training. Most do not feel assured performing eye assessments. Some red eye conditions can become sight threatening, and often exhibit red-flag features....
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
British Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4964165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27493748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u211608.w4680 |
_version_ | 1782445057062731776 |
---|---|
author | Kilduff, Caroline Lois, Charis |
author_facet | Kilduff, Caroline Lois, Charis |
author_sort | Kilduff, Caroline |
collection | PubMed |
description | Up to five percent of primary care consultations are eye-related, yet 96% of General Practitioners (GPs) do not undergo postgraduate ophthalmology training. Most do not feel assured performing eye assessments. Some red eye conditions can become sight threatening, and often exhibit red-flag features. These features include moderate pain, photophobia, reduced visual acuity (VA), eye-trauma, or unilateral marked redness. The aim of this project was to improve primary care assessment and referral of patients presenting with red-flag features based on the NICE ‘Red Eye’ Clinical Knowledge Summary recommendations. Data was collected retrospectively from 139 red eye consultations. A practice meeting highlighted poor awareness of red-flag features, low confidence levels in eye assessments, and time-constraints during appointments. Interventions were based on feedback from staff. These included a primary care teaching session on red-flag features, a VA measurement tutorial, and provision of a red eye toolkit, including VA equipment, to each consultation room. At baseline, each patient had on average 0.9 red-flag features assessed. Only 36.0% (9/25) of patients with red-flag features were appropriately referred to same-day ophthalmology services. Following two improvement cycles, a significant improvement was seen in almost every parameter. On average, each patient had 2.7 red-flag features assessed (vs 0.9, p<0.001). VA was assessed in 55.6% of consultations (vs 7.9%, p<0.001), pain was quantified in 81.5% (vs 20.9%, p=0.005), eye-trauma or foreign-body (51.8% vs 8.6%, p<0.001), extent of redness was documented in 66.7% (vs 14.4%, p<0.001). Only photophobia remained poorly assessed (18.5% vs 14.4%, p=0.75). Following this, 75.0% (6/8) of patients were appropriately referred. This project reflected the literature regarding low confidence and inexperience amongst GPs when faced with ophthalmic conditions. Improvements in education are required to ensure accurate assessments can be undertaken in a time-constrained environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4964165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | British Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49641652016-08-04 Red eyes and red-flags: improving ophthalmic assessment and referral in primary care Kilduff, Caroline Lois, Charis BMJ Qual Improv Rep BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Up to five percent of primary care consultations are eye-related, yet 96% of General Practitioners (GPs) do not undergo postgraduate ophthalmology training. Most do not feel assured performing eye assessments. Some red eye conditions can become sight threatening, and often exhibit red-flag features. These features include moderate pain, photophobia, reduced visual acuity (VA), eye-trauma, or unilateral marked redness. The aim of this project was to improve primary care assessment and referral of patients presenting with red-flag features based on the NICE ‘Red Eye’ Clinical Knowledge Summary recommendations. Data was collected retrospectively from 139 red eye consultations. A practice meeting highlighted poor awareness of red-flag features, low confidence levels in eye assessments, and time-constraints during appointments. Interventions were based on feedback from staff. These included a primary care teaching session on red-flag features, a VA measurement tutorial, and provision of a red eye toolkit, including VA equipment, to each consultation room. At baseline, each patient had on average 0.9 red-flag features assessed. Only 36.0% (9/25) of patients with red-flag features were appropriately referred to same-day ophthalmology services. Following two improvement cycles, a significant improvement was seen in almost every parameter. On average, each patient had 2.7 red-flag features assessed (vs 0.9, p<0.001). VA was assessed in 55.6% of consultations (vs 7.9%, p<0.001), pain was quantified in 81.5% (vs 20.9%, p=0.005), eye-trauma or foreign-body (51.8% vs 8.6%, p<0.001), extent of redness was documented in 66.7% (vs 14.4%, p<0.001). Only photophobia remained poorly assessed (18.5% vs 14.4%, p=0.75). Following this, 75.0% (6/8) of patients were appropriately referred. This project reflected the literature regarding low confidence and inexperience amongst GPs when faced with ophthalmic conditions. Improvements in education are required to ensure accurate assessments can be undertaken in a time-constrained environment. British Publishing Group 2016-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4964165/ /pubmed/27493748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u211608.w4680 Text en © 2016, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme Kilduff, Caroline Lois, Charis Red eyes and red-flags: improving ophthalmic assessment and referral in primary care |
title | Red eyes and red-flags: improving ophthalmic assessment and referral in primary care |
title_full | Red eyes and red-flags: improving ophthalmic assessment and referral in primary care |
title_fullStr | Red eyes and red-flags: improving ophthalmic assessment and referral in primary care |
title_full_unstemmed | Red eyes and red-flags: improving ophthalmic assessment and referral in primary care |
title_short | Red eyes and red-flags: improving ophthalmic assessment and referral in primary care |
title_sort | red eyes and red-flags: improving ophthalmic assessment and referral in primary care |
topic | BMJ Quality Improvement Programme |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4964165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27493748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u211608.w4680 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kilduffcaroline redeyesandredflagsimprovingophthalmicassessmentandreferralinprimarycare AT loischaris redeyesandredflagsimprovingophthalmicassessmentandreferralinprimarycare |