Cargando…

Sugar-sweetened beverages coverage in the British media: an analysis of public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging

OBJECTIVES: To assess the extent of media-based public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging regarding sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs). DESIGN: We conducted a systematic analysis to identify and examine all articles regarding SSBs published in all mainstream British print newspapers and the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elliott-Green, Alex, Hyseni, Lirije, Lloyd-Williams, Ffion, Bromley, Helen, Capewell, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4964256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27436666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011295
_version_ 1782445071884353536
author Elliott-Green, Alex
Hyseni, Lirije
Lloyd-Williams, Ffion
Bromley, Helen
Capewell, Simon
author_facet Elliott-Green, Alex
Hyseni, Lirije
Lloyd-Williams, Ffion
Bromley, Helen
Capewell, Simon
author_sort Elliott-Green, Alex
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the extent of media-based public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging regarding sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs). DESIGN: We conducted a systematic analysis to identify and examine all articles regarding SSBs published in all mainstream British print newspapers and their online news websites from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2014. We initially conducted a brief literature search to develop appropriate search terms and categorisations for grouping and analysing the articles. Articles were then coded according to the publishing newspaper, article type, topic, prominence and slant (pro-SSB or anti-SSB). A contextual analysis was undertaken to examine key messages in the articles. RESULTS: We identified 374 articles published during 2014. The majority of articles (81%) suggested that SSBs are unhealthy. Messaging from experts, campaign groups and health organisations was fairly consistent about the detrimental effects of SSB on health. However, relatively few articles assessed any approaches or solutions to potentially combat the problems associated with SSBs. Only one-quarter (24%) suggested any policy change. Meanwhile, articles concerning the food industry produced consistent messages emphasising consumer choice and individual responsibility for making choices regarding SSB consumption, and promoting and advertising their products. The food industry thus often managed to avoid association with the negative press that their products were receiving. CONCLUSIONS: SSBs were frequently published in mainstream British print newspapers and their online news websites during 2014. Public health media advocacy was prominent throughout, with a growing consensus that sugary drinks are bad for people's health. However, the challenge for public health will be to mobilise supportive public opinion to help implement effective regulatory policies. Only then will our population's excess consumption of SSBs come under control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4964256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49642562016-08-03 Sugar-sweetened beverages coverage in the British media: an analysis of public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging Elliott-Green, Alex Hyseni, Lirije Lloyd-Williams, Ffion Bromley, Helen Capewell, Simon BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To assess the extent of media-based public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging regarding sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs). DESIGN: We conducted a systematic analysis to identify and examine all articles regarding SSBs published in all mainstream British print newspapers and their online news websites from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2014. We initially conducted a brief literature search to develop appropriate search terms and categorisations for grouping and analysing the articles. Articles were then coded according to the publishing newspaper, article type, topic, prominence and slant (pro-SSB or anti-SSB). A contextual analysis was undertaken to examine key messages in the articles. RESULTS: We identified 374 articles published during 2014. The majority of articles (81%) suggested that SSBs are unhealthy. Messaging from experts, campaign groups and health organisations was fairly consistent about the detrimental effects of SSB on health. However, relatively few articles assessed any approaches or solutions to potentially combat the problems associated with SSBs. Only one-quarter (24%) suggested any policy change. Meanwhile, articles concerning the food industry produced consistent messages emphasising consumer choice and individual responsibility for making choices regarding SSB consumption, and promoting and advertising their products. The food industry thus often managed to avoid association with the negative press that their products were receiving. CONCLUSIONS: SSBs were frequently published in mainstream British print newspapers and their online news websites during 2014. Public health media advocacy was prominent throughout, with a growing consensus that sugary drinks are bad for people's health. However, the challenge for public health will be to mobilise supportive public opinion to help implement effective regulatory policies. Only then will our population's excess consumption of SSBs come under control. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4964256/ /pubmed/27436666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011295 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Elliott-Green, Alex
Hyseni, Lirije
Lloyd-Williams, Ffion
Bromley, Helen
Capewell, Simon
Sugar-sweetened beverages coverage in the British media: an analysis of public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging
title Sugar-sweetened beverages coverage in the British media: an analysis of public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging
title_full Sugar-sweetened beverages coverage in the British media: an analysis of public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging
title_fullStr Sugar-sweetened beverages coverage in the British media: an analysis of public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging
title_full_unstemmed Sugar-sweetened beverages coverage in the British media: an analysis of public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging
title_short Sugar-sweetened beverages coverage in the British media: an analysis of public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging
title_sort sugar-sweetened beverages coverage in the british media: an analysis of public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4964256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27436666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011295
work_keys_str_mv AT elliottgreenalex sugarsweetenedbeveragescoverageinthebritishmediaananalysisofpublichealthadvocacyversusproindustrymessaging
AT hysenilirije sugarsweetenedbeveragescoverageinthebritishmediaananalysisofpublichealthadvocacyversusproindustrymessaging
AT lloydwilliamsffion sugarsweetenedbeveragescoverageinthebritishmediaananalysisofpublichealthadvocacyversusproindustrymessaging
AT bromleyhelen sugarsweetenedbeveragescoverageinthebritishmediaananalysisofpublichealthadvocacyversusproindustrymessaging
AT capewellsimon sugarsweetenedbeveragescoverageinthebritishmediaananalysisofpublichealthadvocacyversusproindustrymessaging