Cargando…
Sugar-sweetened beverages coverage in the British media: an analysis of public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging
OBJECTIVES: To assess the extent of media-based public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging regarding sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs). DESIGN: We conducted a systematic analysis to identify and examine all articles regarding SSBs published in all mainstream British print newspapers and the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4964256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27436666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011295 |
_version_ | 1782445071884353536 |
---|---|
author | Elliott-Green, Alex Hyseni, Lirije Lloyd-Williams, Ffion Bromley, Helen Capewell, Simon |
author_facet | Elliott-Green, Alex Hyseni, Lirije Lloyd-Williams, Ffion Bromley, Helen Capewell, Simon |
author_sort | Elliott-Green, Alex |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess the extent of media-based public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging regarding sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs). DESIGN: We conducted a systematic analysis to identify and examine all articles regarding SSBs published in all mainstream British print newspapers and their online news websites from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2014. We initially conducted a brief literature search to develop appropriate search terms and categorisations for grouping and analysing the articles. Articles were then coded according to the publishing newspaper, article type, topic, prominence and slant (pro-SSB or anti-SSB). A contextual analysis was undertaken to examine key messages in the articles. RESULTS: We identified 374 articles published during 2014. The majority of articles (81%) suggested that SSBs are unhealthy. Messaging from experts, campaign groups and health organisations was fairly consistent about the detrimental effects of SSB on health. However, relatively few articles assessed any approaches or solutions to potentially combat the problems associated with SSBs. Only one-quarter (24%) suggested any policy change. Meanwhile, articles concerning the food industry produced consistent messages emphasising consumer choice and individual responsibility for making choices regarding SSB consumption, and promoting and advertising their products. The food industry thus often managed to avoid association with the negative press that their products were receiving. CONCLUSIONS: SSBs were frequently published in mainstream British print newspapers and their online news websites during 2014. Public health media advocacy was prominent throughout, with a growing consensus that sugary drinks are bad for people's health. However, the challenge for public health will be to mobilise supportive public opinion to help implement effective regulatory policies. Only then will our population's excess consumption of SSBs come under control. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4964256 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49642562016-08-03 Sugar-sweetened beverages coverage in the British media: an analysis of public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging Elliott-Green, Alex Hyseni, Lirije Lloyd-Williams, Ffion Bromley, Helen Capewell, Simon BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To assess the extent of media-based public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging regarding sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs). DESIGN: We conducted a systematic analysis to identify and examine all articles regarding SSBs published in all mainstream British print newspapers and their online news websites from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2014. We initially conducted a brief literature search to develop appropriate search terms and categorisations for grouping and analysing the articles. Articles were then coded according to the publishing newspaper, article type, topic, prominence and slant (pro-SSB or anti-SSB). A contextual analysis was undertaken to examine key messages in the articles. RESULTS: We identified 374 articles published during 2014. The majority of articles (81%) suggested that SSBs are unhealthy. Messaging from experts, campaign groups and health organisations was fairly consistent about the detrimental effects of SSB on health. However, relatively few articles assessed any approaches or solutions to potentially combat the problems associated with SSBs. Only one-quarter (24%) suggested any policy change. Meanwhile, articles concerning the food industry produced consistent messages emphasising consumer choice and individual responsibility for making choices regarding SSB consumption, and promoting and advertising their products. The food industry thus often managed to avoid association with the negative press that their products were receiving. CONCLUSIONS: SSBs were frequently published in mainstream British print newspapers and their online news websites during 2014. Public health media advocacy was prominent throughout, with a growing consensus that sugary drinks are bad for people's health. However, the challenge for public health will be to mobilise supportive public opinion to help implement effective regulatory policies. Only then will our population's excess consumption of SSBs come under control. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4964256/ /pubmed/27436666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011295 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Public Health Elliott-Green, Alex Hyseni, Lirije Lloyd-Williams, Ffion Bromley, Helen Capewell, Simon Sugar-sweetened beverages coverage in the British media: an analysis of public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging |
title | Sugar-sweetened beverages coverage in the British media: an analysis of public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging |
title_full | Sugar-sweetened beverages coverage in the British media: an analysis of public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging |
title_fullStr | Sugar-sweetened beverages coverage in the British media: an analysis of public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Sugar-sweetened beverages coverage in the British media: an analysis of public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging |
title_short | Sugar-sweetened beverages coverage in the British media: an analysis of public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging |
title_sort | sugar-sweetened beverages coverage in the british media: an analysis of public health advocacy versus pro-industry messaging |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4964256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27436666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011295 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elliottgreenalex sugarsweetenedbeveragescoverageinthebritishmediaananalysisofpublichealthadvocacyversusproindustrymessaging AT hysenilirije sugarsweetenedbeveragescoverageinthebritishmediaananalysisofpublichealthadvocacyversusproindustrymessaging AT lloydwilliamsffion sugarsweetenedbeveragescoverageinthebritishmediaananalysisofpublichealthadvocacyversusproindustrymessaging AT bromleyhelen sugarsweetenedbeveragescoverageinthebritishmediaananalysisofpublichealthadvocacyversusproindustrymessaging AT capewellsimon sugarsweetenedbeveragescoverageinthebritishmediaananalysisofpublichealthadvocacyversusproindustrymessaging |