Cargando…

Pain education in pre-registration professional health courses: a protocol for a scoping review

INTRODUCTION: Pain is a global health concern causing significant health and social problems with evidence that patients experiencing pain are receiving inadequate care. The content of pain education in pre-registration professional health courses is thought to be lacking both in the UK and internat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson, Kate, Milligan, James, Johnson, Mark I, Briggs, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4964621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27431903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012001
_version_ 1782445148473393152
author Thompson, Kate
Milligan, James
Johnson, Mark I
Briggs, Michelle
author_facet Thompson, Kate
Milligan, James
Johnson, Mark I
Briggs, Michelle
author_sort Thompson, Kate
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Pain is a global health concern causing significant health and social problems with evidence that patients experiencing pain are receiving inadequate care. The content of pain education in pre-registration professional health courses is thought to be lacking both in the UK and internationally which is unacceptable considering the prevalence of pain. Evaluating the effect of education is complex in that the outcome (improved healthcare) is some distance from the educational approach. Best evidence medical education has been proposed as a continuum between ‘opinion-based teaching’ and ‘evidence-based teaching’. Searching for evidence to inform best practice in health education is complex. A scoping review provides a practical and comprehensive strategy to locate and synthesise literature of varied methodology including reports from a variety of sources. The aim of this article is to describe a protocol for a scoping review that will locate, map and report research, guidelines and policies for pain education in pre-registration professional health courses. The extent, range and nature of reports will be examined, and where possible titles for potential systematic review will be identified. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Reports will be included for review that are directly relevant to the development of the pain curriculum in pre-registration professional health courses, eg nursing, medicine, physiotherapy. The search strategy will identify reports that include [pain] AND [pre-registration education or curriculum] AND [health professionals] in the title or abstract. Two authors will independently screen retrieved studies against eligibility criteria. A numerical analysis regarding the extent, nature and distribution of reports will be given along with a narrative synthesis to describe characteristics of relevant reports. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval was not required to undertake this scoping review. Findings will be published in scientific peer-reviewed journals and via conference presentations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4964621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49646212016-08-03 Pain education in pre-registration professional health courses: a protocol for a scoping review Thompson, Kate Milligan, James Johnson, Mark I Briggs, Michelle BMJ Open Medical Education and Training INTRODUCTION: Pain is a global health concern causing significant health and social problems with evidence that patients experiencing pain are receiving inadequate care. The content of pain education in pre-registration professional health courses is thought to be lacking both in the UK and internationally which is unacceptable considering the prevalence of pain. Evaluating the effect of education is complex in that the outcome (improved healthcare) is some distance from the educational approach. Best evidence medical education has been proposed as a continuum between ‘opinion-based teaching’ and ‘evidence-based teaching’. Searching for evidence to inform best practice in health education is complex. A scoping review provides a practical and comprehensive strategy to locate and synthesise literature of varied methodology including reports from a variety of sources. The aim of this article is to describe a protocol for a scoping review that will locate, map and report research, guidelines and policies for pain education in pre-registration professional health courses. The extent, range and nature of reports will be examined, and where possible titles for potential systematic review will be identified. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Reports will be included for review that are directly relevant to the development of the pain curriculum in pre-registration professional health courses, eg nursing, medicine, physiotherapy. The search strategy will identify reports that include [pain] AND [pre-registration education or curriculum] AND [health professionals] in the title or abstract. Two authors will independently screen retrieved studies against eligibility criteria. A numerical analysis regarding the extent, nature and distribution of reports will be given along with a narrative synthesis to describe characteristics of relevant reports. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval was not required to undertake this scoping review. Findings will be published in scientific peer-reviewed journals and via conference presentations. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4964621/ /pubmed/27431903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012001 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Medical Education and Training
Thompson, Kate
Milligan, James
Johnson, Mark I
Briggs, Michelle
Pain education in pre-registration professional health courses: a protocol for a scoping review
title Pain education in pre-registration professional health courses: a protocol for a scoping review
title_full Pain education in pre-registration professional health courses: a protocol for a scoping review
title_fullStr Pain education in pre-registration professional health courses: a protocol for a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Pain education in pre-registration professional health courses: a protocol for a scoping review
title_short Pain education in pre-registration professional health courses: a protocol for a scoping review
title_sort pain education in pre-registration professional health courses: a protocol for a scoping review
topic Medical Education and Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4964621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27431903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012001
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsonkate paineducationinpreregistrationprofessionalhealthcoursesaprotocolforascopingreview
AT milliganjames paineducationinpreregistrationprofessionalhealthcoursesaprotocolforascopingreview
AT johnsonmarki paineducationinpreregistrationprofessionalhealthcoursesaprotocolforascopingreview
AT briggsmichelle paineducationinpreregistrationprofessionalhealthcoursesaprotocolforascopingreview