Cargando…

Differences in Facial Emotion Recognition between First Episode Psychosis, Borderline Personality Disorder and Healthy Controls

BACKGROUND: Facial emotion recognition (FER) is essential to guide social functioning and behaviour for interpersonal communication. FER may be altered in severe mental illness such as in psychosis and in borderline personality disorder patients. However, it is unclear if these FER alterations are s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Catalan, Ana, Gonzalez de Artaza, Maider, Bustamante, Sonia, Orgaz, Pablo, Osa, Luis, Angosto, Virxinia, Valverde, Cristina, Bilbao, Amaia, Madrazo, Arantza, van Os, Jim, Gonzalez-Torres, Miguel Angel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4965014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27467692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160056
_version_ 1782445194025631744
author Catalan, Ana
Gonzalez de Artaza, Maider
Bustamante, Sonia
Orgaz, Pablo
Osa, Luis
Angosto, Virxinia
Valverde, Cristina
Bilbao, Amaia
Madrazo, Arantza
van Os, Jim
Gonzalez-Torres, Miguel Angel
author_facet Catalan, Ana
Gonzalez de Artaza, Maider
Bustamante, Sonia
Orgaz, Pablo
Osa, Luis
Angosto, Virxinia
Valverde, Cristina
Bilbao, Amaia
Madrazo, Arantza
van Os, Jim
Gonzalez-Torres, Miguel Angel
author_sort Catalan, Ana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Facial emotion recognition (FER) is essential to guide social functioning and behaviour for interpersonal communication. FER may be altered in severe mental illness such as in psychosis and in borderline personality disorder patients. However, it is unclear if these FER alterations are specifically related to psychosis. Awareness of FER alterations may be useful in clinical settings to improve treatment strategies. The aim of our study was to examine FER in patients with severe mental disorder and their relation with psychotic symptomatology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Socio-demographic and clinical variables were collected. Alterations on emotion recognition were assessed in 3 groups: patients with first episode psychosis (FEP) (n = 64), borderline personality patients (BPD) (n = 37) and healthy controls (n = 137), using the Degraded Facial Affect Recognition Task. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Structured Interview for Schizotypy Revised and Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences scales were used to assess positive psychotic symptoms. WAIS III subtests were used to assess IQ. RESULTS: Kruskal-Wallis analysis showed a significant difference between groups on the FER of neutral faces score between FEP, BPD patients and controls and between FEP patients and controls in angry face recognition. No significant differences were found between groups in the fear or happy conditions. There was a significant difference between groups in the attribution of negative emotion to happy faces. BPD and FEP groups had a much higher tendency to recognize happy faces as negatives. There was no association with the different symptom domains in either group. CONCLUSIONS: FEP and BPD patients have problems in recognizing neutral faces more frequently than controls. Moreover, patients tend to over-report negative emotions in recognition of happy faces. Although no relation between psychotic symptoms and FER alterations was found, these deficits could contribute to a patient’s misinterpretations in daily life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4965014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49650142016-08-18 Differences in Facial Emotion Recognition between First Episode Psychosis, Borderline Personality Disorder and Healthy Controls Catalan, Ana Gonzalez de Artaza, Maider Bustamante, Sonia Orgaz, Pablo Osa, Luis Angosto, Virxinia Valverde, Cristina Bilbao, Amaia Madrazo, Arantza van Os, Jim Gonzalez-Torres, Miguel Angel PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Facial emotion recognition (FER) is essential to guide social functioning and behaviour for interpersonal communication. FER may be altered in severe mental illness such as in psychosis and in borderline personality disorder patients. However, it is unclear if these FER alterations are specifically related to psychosis. Awareness of FER alterations may be useful in clinical settings to improve treatment strategies. The aim of our study was to examine FER in patients with severe mental disorder and their relation with psychotic symptomatology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Socio-demographic and clinical variables were collected. Alterations on emotion recognition were assessed in 3 groups: patients with first episode psychosis (FEP) (n = 64), borderline personality patients (BPD) (n = 37) and healthy controls (n = 137), using the Degraded Facial Affect Recognition Task. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Structured Interview for Schizotypy Revised and Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences scales were used to assess positive psychotic symptoms. WAIS III subtests were used to assess IQ. RESULTS: Kruskal-Wallis analysis showed a significant difference between groups on the FER of neutral faces score between FEP, BPD patients and controls and between FEP patients and controls in angry face recognition. No significant differences were found between groups in the fear or happy conditions. There was a significant difference between groups in the attribution of negative emotion to happy faces. BPD and FEP groups had a much higher tendency to recognize happy faces as negatives. There was no association with the different symptom domains in either group. CONCLUSIONS: FEP and BPD patients have problems in recognizing neutral faces more frequently than controls. Moreover, patients tend to over-report negative emotions in recognition of happy faces. Although no relation between psychotic symptoms and FER alterations was found, these deficits could contribute to a patient’s misinterpretations in daily life. Public Library of Science 2016-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4965014/ /pubmed/27467692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160056 Text en © 2016 Catalan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Catalan, Ana
Gonzalez de Artaza, Maider
Bustamante, Sonia
Orgaz, Pablo
Osa, Luis
Angosto, Virxinia
Valverde, Cristina
Bilbao, Amaia
Madrazo, Arantza
van Os, Jim
Gonzalez-Torres, Miguel Angel
Differences in Facial Emotion Recognition between First Episode Psychosis, Borderline Personality Disorder and Healthy Controls
title Differences in Facial Emotion Recognition between First Episode Psychosis, Borderline Personality Disorder and Healthy Controls
title_full Differences in Facial Emotion Recognition between First Episode Psychosis, Borderline Personality Disorder and Healthy Controls
title_fullStr Differences in Facial Emotion Recognition between First Episode Psychosis, Borderline Personality Disorder and Healthy Controls
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Facial Emotion Recognition between First Episode Psychosis, Borderline Personality Disorder and Healthy Controls
title_short Differences in Facial Emotion Recognition between First Episode Psychosis, Borderline Personality Disorder and Healthy Controls
title_sort differences in facial emotion recognition between first episode psychosis, borderline personality disorder and healthy controls
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4965014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27467692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160056
work_keys_str_mv AT catalanana differencesinfacialemotionrecognitionbetweenfirstepisodepsychosisborderlinepersonalitydisorderandhealthycontrols
AT gonzalezdeartazamaider differencesinfacialemotionrecognitionbetweenfirstepisodepsychosisborderlinepersonalitydisorderandhealthycontrols
AT bustamantesonia differencesinfacialemotionrecognitionbetweenfirstepisodepsychosisborderlinepersonalitydisorderandhealthycontrols
AT orgazpablo differencesinfacialemotionrecognitionbetweenfirstepisodepsychosisborderlinepersonalitydisorderandhealthycontrols
AT osaluis differencesinfacialemotionrecognitionbetweenfirstepisodepsychosisborderlinepersonalitydisorderandhealthycontrols
AT angostovirxinia differencesinfacialemotionrecognitionbetweenfirstepisodepsychosisborderlinepersonalitydisorderandhealthycontrols
AT valverdecristina differencesinfacialemotionrecognitionbetweenfirstepisodepsychosisborderlinepersonalitydisorderandhealthycontrols
AT bilbaoamaia differencesinfacialemotionrecognitionbetweenfirstepisodepsychosisborderlinepersonalitydisorderandhealthycontrols
AT madrazoarantza differencesinfacialemotionrecognitionbetweenfirstepisodepsychosisborderlinepersonalitydisorderandhealthycontrols
AT vanosjim differencesinfacialemotionrecognitionbetweenfirstepisodepsychosisborderlinepersonalitydisorderandhealthycontrols
AT gonzaleztorresmiguelangel differencesinfacialemotionrecognitionbetweenfirstepisodepsychosisborderlinepersonalitydisorderandhealthycontrols