Cargando…

Evaluation of a method for calculating carboplatin dosage in DeVIC ± R therapy (combination therapy of dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide and carboplatin with or without rituximab) as a salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma

PURPOSE: Several studies have evaluated the utility of extrapolating the Calvert formula in calculating carboplatin (CBDCA) dosages in solid tumours; however, data regarding haematological cancers are less. Therefore, we conducted a preliminary study of the utility of extrapolating the Calvert formu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tomono, Ayana, Ito, Kaori, Hayashi, Takahiro, Ando, Maiko, Ando, Yosuke, Tsuge, Masahiro, Okamoto, Akinao, Inaguma, Yoko, Okamoto, Masataka, Emi, Nobuhiko, Yamada, Shigeki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4965483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27324021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3076-9
_version_ 1782445262382301184
author Tomono, Ayana
Ito, Kaori
Hayashi, Takahiro
Ando, Maiko
Ando, Yosuke
Tsuge, Masahiro
Okamoto, Akinao
Inaguma, Yoko
Okamoto, Masataka
Emi, Nobuhiko
Yamada, Shigeki
author_facet Tomono, Ayana
Ito, Kaori
Hayashi, Takahiro
Ando, Maiko
Ando, Yosuke
Tsuge, Masahiro
Okamoto, Akinao
Inaguma, Yoko
Okamoto, Masataka
Emi, Nobuhiko
Yamada, Shigeki
author_sort Tomono, Ayana
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Several studies have evaluated the utility of extrapolating the Calvert formula in calculating carboplatin (CBDCA) dosages in solid tumours; however, data regarding haematological cancers are less. Therefore, we conducted a preliminary study of the utility of extrapolating the Calvert formula in calculating CBDCA dosages for DeVIC ± R therapy. METHODS: A retrospective study on 57 non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients who had received DeVIC ± R therapy was conducted. The area under the curve (AUC) of CBDCA was back-calculated from actual dosages using the Calvert formula. Patients were divided into two groups according to an AUC ≥ 4 or an AUC < 4, respectively. The Revised Response Criteria of the International Working Group and CTCAE version 4.0 were used for assessing the treatment efficacy and adverse events, respectively. RESULTS: The use of AUC instead of body surface area had greater utility in calculating CBDCA dosage, with a response rate of greater than 50 % in patients receiving DeVIC ± R therapy with an AUC ≥ 4 for CBDCA. The response rate of the AUC ≥ 4 group was significantly higher than that of the AUC < 4 group. Decreased platelet and neutrophil counts of grade ≥3 occurred at higher rates in the AUC ≥ 4 group. CONCLUSION: The extrapolation of the Calvert formula has utility in calculating the CBDCA dosage for DeVIC ± R therapy, and therapeutic efficacy was increased by maintaining the AUC of CBDCA at ≥4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4965483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49654832016-08-10 Evaluation of a method for calculating carboplatin dosage in DeVIC ± R therapy (combination therapy of dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide and carboplatin with or without rituximab) as a salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma Tomono, Ayana Ito, Kaori Hayashi, Takahiro Ando, Maiko Ando, Yosuke Tsuge, Masahiro Okamoto, Akinao Inaguma, Yoko Okamoto, Masataka Emi, Nobuhiko Yamada, Shigeki Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Original Article PURPOSE: Several studies have evaluated the utility of extrapolating the Calvert formula in calculating carboplatin (CBDCA) dosages in solid tumours; however, data regarding haematological cancers are less. Therefore, we conducted a preliminary study of the utility of extrapolating the Calvert formula in calculating CBDCA dosages for DeVIC ± R therapy. METHODS: A retrospective study on 57 non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients who had received DeVIC ± R therapy was conducted. The area under the curve (AUC) of CBDCA was back-calculated from actual dosages using the Calvert formula. Patients were divided into two groups according to an AUC ≥ 4 or an AUC < 4, respectively. The Revised Response Criteria of the International Working Group and CTCAE version 4.0 were used for assessing the treatment efficacy and adverse events, respectively. RESULTS: The use of AUC instead of body surface area had greater utility in calculating CBDCA dosage, with a response rate of greater than 50 % in patients receiving DeVIC ± R therapy with an AUC ≥ 4 for CBDCA. The response rate of the AUC ≥ 4 group was significantly higher than that of the AUC < 4 group. Decreased platelet and neutrophil counts of grade ≥3 occurred at higher rates in the AUC ≥ 4 group. CONCLUSION: The extrapolation of the Calvert formula has utility in calculating the CBDCA dosage for DeVIC ± R therapy, and therapeutic efficacy was increased by maintaining the AUC of CBDCA at ≥4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-06-20 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4965483/ /pubmed/27324021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3076-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tomono, Ayana
Ito, Kaori
Hayashi, Takahiro
Ando, Maiko
Ando, Yosuke
Tsuge, Masahiro
Okamoto, Akinao
Inaguma, Yoko
Okamoto, Masataka
Emi, Nobuhiko
Yamada, Shigeki
Evaluation of a method for calculating carboplatin dosage in DeVIC ± R therapy (combination therapy of dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide and carboplatin with or without rituximab) as a salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma
title Evaluation of a method for calculating carboplatin dosage in DeVIC ± R therapy (combination therapy of dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide and carboplatin with or without rituximab) as a salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma
title_full Evaluation of a method for calculating carboplatin dosage in DeVIC ± R therapy (combination therapy of dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide and carboplatin with or without rituximab) as a salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma
title_fullStr Evaluation of a method for calculating carboplatin dosage in DeVIC ± R therapy (combination therapy of dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide and carboplatin with or without rituximab) as a salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a method for calculating carboplatin dosage in DeVIC ± R therapy (combination therapy of dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide and carboplatin with or without rituximab) as a salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma
title_short Evaluation of a method for calculating carboplatin dosage in DeVIC ± R therapy (combination therapy of dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide and carboplatin with or without rituximab) as a salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma
title_sort evaluation of a method for calculating carboplatin dosage in devic ± r therapy (combination therapy of dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide and carboplatin with or without rituximab) as a salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory non-hodgkin lymphoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4965483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27324021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3076-9
work_keys_str_mv AT tomonoayana evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma
AT itokaori evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma
AT hayashitakahiro evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma
AT andomaiko evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma
AT andoyosuke evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma
AT tsugemasahiro evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma
AT okamotoakinao evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma
AT inagumayoko evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma
AT okamotomasataka evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma
AT eminobuhiko evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma
AT yamadashigeki evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma