Cargando…
Evaluation of a method for calculating carboplatin dosage in DeVIC ± R therapy (combination therapy of dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide and carboplatin with or without rituximab) as a salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma
PURPOSE: Several studies have evaluated the utility of extrapolating the Calvert formula in calculating carboplatin (CBDCA) dosages in solid tumours; however, data regarding haematological cancers are less. Therefore, we conducted a preliminary study of the utility of extrapolating the Calvert formu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4965483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27324021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3076-9 |
_version_ | 1782445262382301184 |
---|---|
author | Tomono, Ayana Ito, Kaori Hayashi, Takahiro Ando, Maiko Ando, Yosuke Tsuge, Masahiro Okamoto, Akinao Inaguma, Yoko Okamoto, Masataka Emi, Nobuhiko Yamada, Shigeki |
author_facet | Tomono, Ayana Ito, Kaori Hayashi, Takahiro Ando, Maiko Ando, Yosuke Tsuge, Masahiro Okamoto, Akinao Inaguma, Yoko Okamoto, Masataka Emi, Nobuhiko Yamada, Shigeki |
author_sort | Tomono, Ayana |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Several studies have evaluated the utility of extrapolating the Calvert formula in calculating carboplatin (CBDCA) dosages in solid tumours; however, data regarding haematological cancers are less. Therefore, we conducted a preliminary study of the utility of extrapolating the Calvert formula in calculating CBDCA dosages for DeVIC ± R therapy. METHODS: A retrospective study on 57 non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients who had received DeVIC ± R therapy was conducted. The area under the curve (AUC) of CBDCA was back-calculated from actual dosages using the Calvert formula. Patients were divided into two groups according to an AUC ≥ 4 or an AUC < 4, respectively. The Revised Response Criteria of the International Working Group and CTCAE version 4.0 were used for assessing the treatment efficacy and adverse events, respectively. RESULTS: The use of AUC instead of body surface area had greater utility in calculating CBDCA dosage, with a response rate of greater than 50 % in patients receiving DeVIC ± R therapy with an AUC ≥ 4 for CBDCA. The response rate of the AUC ≥ 4 group was significantly higher than that of the AUC < 4 group. Decreased platelet and neutrophil counts of grade ≥3 occurred at higher rates in the AUC ≥ 4 group. CONCLUSION: The extrapolation of the Calvert formula has utility in calculating the CBDCA dosage for DeVIC ± R therapy, and therapeutic efficacy was increased by maintaining the AUC of CBDCA at ≥4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4965483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49654832016-08-10 Evaluation of a method for calculating carboplatin dosage in DeVIC ± R therapy (combination therapy of dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide and carboplatin with or without rituximab) as a salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma Tomono, Ayana Ito, Kaori Hayashi, Takahiro Ando, Maiko Ando, Yosuke Tsuge, Masahiro Okamoto, Akinao Inaguma, Yoko Okamoto, Masataka Emi, Nobuhiko Yamada, Shigeki Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Original Article PURPOSE: Several studies have evaluated the utility of extrapolating the Calvert formula in calculating carboplatin (CBDCA) dosages in solid tumours; however, data regarding haematological cancers are less. Therefore, we conducted a preliminary study of the utility of extrapolating the Calvert formula in calculating CBDCA dosages for DeVIC ± R therapy. METHODS: A retrospective study on 57 non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients who had received DeVIC ± R therapy was conducted. The area under the curve (AUC) of CBDCA was back-calculated from actual dosages using the Calvert formula. Patients were divided into two groups according to an AUC ≥ 4 or an AUC < 4, respectively. The Revised Response Criteria of the International Working Group and CTCAE version 4.0 were used for assessing the treatment efficacy and adverse events, respectively. RESULTS: The use of AUC instead of body surface area had greater utility in calculating CBDCA dosage, with a response rate of greater than 50 % in patients receiving DeVIC ± R therapy with an AUC ≥ 4 for CBDCA. The response rate of the AUC ≥ 4 group was significantly higher than that of the AUC < 4 group. Decreased platelet and neutrophil counts of grade ≥3 occurred at higher rates in the AUC ≥ 4 group. CONCLUSION: The extrapolation of the Calvert formula has utility in calculating the CBDCA dosage for DeVIC ± R therapy, and therapeutic efficacy was increased by maintaining the AUC of CBDCA at ≥4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-06-20 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4965483/ /pubmed/27324021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3076-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tomono, Ayana Ito, Kaori Hayashi, Takahiro Ando, Maiko Ando, Yosuke Tsuge, Masahiro Okamoto, Akinao Inaguma, Yoko Okamoto, Masataka Emi, Nobuhiko Yamada, Shigeki Evaluation of a method for calculating carboplatin dosage in DeVIC ± R therapy (combination therapy of dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide and carboplatin with or without rituximab) as a salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma |
title | Evaluation of a method for calculating carboplatin dosage in DeVIC ± R therapy (combination therapy of dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide and carboplatin with or without rituximab) as a salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma |
title_full | Evaluation of a method for calculating carboplatin dosage in DeVIC ± R therapy (combination therapy of dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide and carboplatin with or without rituximab) as a salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a method for calculating carboplatin dosage in DeVIC ± R therapy (combination therapy of dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide and carboplatin with or without rituximab) as a salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a method for calculating carboplatin dosage in DeVIC ± R therapy (combination therapy of dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide and carboplatin with or without rituximab) as a salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma |
title_short | Evaluation of a method for calculating carboplatin dosage in DeVIC ± R therapy (combination therapy of dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide and carboplatin with or without rituximab) as a salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma |
title_sort | evaluation of a method for calculating carboplatin dosage in devic ± r therapy (combination therapy of dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide and carboplatin with or without rituximab) as a salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory non-hodgkin lymphoma |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4965483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27324021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3076-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tomonoayana evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma AT itokaori evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma AT hayashitakahiro evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma AT andomaiko evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma AT andoyosuke evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma AT tsugemasahiro evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma AT okamotoakinao evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma AT inagumayoko evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma AT okamotomasataka evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma AT eminobuhiko evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma AT yamadashigeki evaluationofamethodforcalculatingcarboplatindosageindevicrtherapycombinationtherapyofdexamethasoneetoposideifosfamideandcarboplatinwithorwithoutrituximabasasalvagetherapyinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorynonhodgkinlymphoma |