Cargando…

Comparison of eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical applications

The cultivated silk, mulberry, is being used as biomaterial in different forms. Eri, tasar and muga are some of the known wild silk varieties. The studies on biomedical applications of electrospun mats produced from these wild silks are limited though few studies on eri silk are available. In this w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andiappan, Muthumanickkam, Kumari, Tinesh, Sundaramoorthy, Subramanian, Meiyazhagan, Gowri, Manoharan, Prasath, Venkataraman, Ganesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4965488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27525199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40204-016-0047-5
_version_ 1782445263535734784
author Andiappan, Muthumanickkam
Kumari, Tinesh
Sundaramoorthy, Subramanian
Meiyazhagan, Gowri
Manoharan, Prasath
Venkataraman, Ganesh
author_facet Andiappan, Muthumanickkam
Kumari, Tinesh
Sundaramoorthy, Subramanian
Meiyazhagan, Gowri
Manoharan, Prasath
Venkataraman, Ganesh
author_sort Andiappan, Muthumanickkam
collection PubMed
description The cultivated silk, mulberry, is being used as biomaterial in different forms. Eri, tasar and muga are some of the known wild silk varieties. The studies on biomedical applications of electrospun mats produced from these wild silks are limited though few studies on eri silk are available. In this work, comparison was made between eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical application. The scaffolds were produced from eri silk fibroin (ESF) and tasar silk fibroin (TSF) by electrospinning method and they were treated with ethanol to improve dimensional stability. Ethanol treatment increased the crystallinity% of both ESF and TSF scaffolds. The crystallinity percentage of the ESF and TSF scaffolds was found to be 46.7 and 42.8 % respectively. Thermal stability was higher for ESF than that of TSF scaffold. The hemolytic % of ESF and TSF scaffolds was found to be 1.3 and 7.7 % respectively. The platelet adhesion on the surface of ESF scaffold was lower than that found on TSF scaffold. Better fibroblast cell attachment, binding and spreading was found on the ESF scaffold. The cell viability on ESF scaffold was 83.78 % and in TSF was 78.01 % for 48 h. The results showed that ESF electrospun scaffold can be considered as a better biomaterial for biomedical applications compared to that of TSF scaffold.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4965488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49654882016-08-10 Comparison of eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical applications Andiappan, Muthumanickkam Kumari, Tinesh Sundaramoorthy, Subramanian Meiyazhagan, Gowri Manoharan, Prasath Venkataraman, Ganesh Prog Biomater Original Research The cultivated silk, mulberry, is being used as biomaterial in different forms. Eri, tasar and muga are some of the known wild silk varieties. The studies on biomedical applications of electrospun mats produced from these wild silks are limited though few studies on eri silk are available. In this work, comparison was made between eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical application. The scaffolds were produced from eri silk fibroin (ESF) and tasar silk fibroin (TSF) by electrospinning method and they were treated with ethanol to improve dimensional stability. Ethanol treatment increased the crystallinity% of both ESF and TSF scaffolds. The crystallinity percentage of the ESF and TSF scaffolds was found to be 46.7 and 42.8 % respectively. Thermal stability was higher for ESF than that of TSF scaffold. The hemolytic % of ESF and TSF scaffolds was found to be 1.3 and 7.7 % respectively. The platelet adhesion on the surface of ESF scaffold was lower than that found on TSF scaffold. Better fibroblast cell attachment, binding and spreading was found on the ESF scaffold. The cell viability on ESF scaffold was 83.78 % and in TSF was 78.01 % for 48 h. The results showed that ESF electrospun scaffold can be considered as a better biomaterial for biomedical applications compared to that of TSF scaffold. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4965488/ /pubmed/27525199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40204-016-0047-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Andiappan, Muthumanickkam
Kumari, Tinesh
Sundaramoorthy, Subramanian
Meiyazhagan, Gowri
Manoharan, Prasath
Venkataraman, Ganesh
Comparison of eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical applications
title Comparison of eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical applications
title_full Comparison of eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical applications
title_fullStr Comparison of eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical applications
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical applications
title_short Comparison of eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical applications
title_sort comparison of eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical applications
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4965488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27525199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40204-016-0047-5
work_keys_str_mv AT andiappanmuthumanickkam comparisonoferiandtasarsilkfibroinscaffoldsforbiomedicalapplications
AT kumaritinesh comparisonoferiandtasarsilkfibroinscaffoldsforbiomedicalapplications
AT sundaramoorthysubramanian comparisonoferiandtasarsilkfibroinscaffoldsforbiomedicalapplications
AT meiyazhagangowri comparisonoferiandtasarsilkfibroinscaffoldsforbiomedicalapplications
AT manoharanprasath comparisonoferiandtasarsilkfibroinscaffoldsforbiomedicalapplications
AT venkataramanganesh comparisonoferiandtasarsilkfibroinscaffoldsforbiomedicalapplications