Cargando…
Comparison of eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical applications
The cultivated silk, mulberry, is being used as biomaterial in different forms. Eri, tasar and muga are some of the known wild silk varieties. The studies on biomedical applications of electrospun mats produced from these wild silks are limited though few studies on eri silk are available. In this w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4965488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27525199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40204-016-0047-5 |
_version_ | 1782445263535734784 |
---|---|
author | Andiappan, Muthumanickkam Kumari, Tinesh Sundaramoorthy, Subramanian Meiyazhagan, Gowri Manoharan, Prasath Venkataraman, Ganesh |
author_facet | Andiappan, Muthumanickkam Kumari, Tinesh Sundaramoorthy, Subramanian Meiyazhagan, Gowri Manoharan, Prasath Venkataraman, Ganesh |
author_sort | Andiappan, Muthumanickkam |
collection | PubMed |
description | The cultivated silk, mulberry, is being used as biomaterial in different forms. Eri, tasar and muga are some of the known wild silk varieties. The studies on biomedical applications of electrospun mats produced from these wild silks are limited though few studies on eri silk are available. In this work, comparison was made between eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical application. The scaffolds were produced from eri silk fibroin (ESF) and tasar silk fibroin (TSF) by electrospinning method and they were treated with ethanol to improve dimensional stability. Ethanol treatment increased the crystallinity% of both ESF and TSF scaffolds. The crystallinity percentage of the ESF and TSF scaffolds was found to be 46.7 and 42.8 % respectively. Thermal stability was higher for ESF than that of TSF scaffold. The hemolytic % of ESF and TSF scaffolds was found to be 1.3 and 7.7 % respectively. The platelet adhesion on the surface of ESF scaffold was lower than that found on TSF scaffold. Better fibroblast cell attachment, binding and spreading was found on the ESF scaffold. The cell viability on ESF scaffold was 83.78 % and in TSF was 78.01 % for 48 h. The results showed that ESF electrospun scaffold can be considered as a better biomaterial for biomedical applications compared to that of TSF scaffold. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4965488 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49654882016-08-10 Comparison of eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical applications Andiappan, Muthumanickkam Kumari, Tinesh Sundaramoorthy, Subramanian Meiyazhagan, Gowri Manoharan, Prasath Venkataraman, Ganesh Prog Biomater Original Research The cultivated silk, mulberry, is being used as biomaterial in different forms. Eri, tasar and muga are some of the known wild silk varieties. The studies on biomedical applications of electrospun mats produced from these wild silks are limited though few studies on eri silk are available. In this work, comparison was made between eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical application. The scaffolds were produced from eri silk fibroin (ESF) and tasar silk fibroin (TSF) by electrospinning method and they were treated with ethanol to improve dimensional stability. Ethanol treatment increased the crystallinity% of both ESF and TSF scaffolds. The crystallinity percentage of the ESF and TSF scaffolds was found to be 46.7 and 42.8 % respectively. Thermal stability was higher for ESF than that of TSF scaffold. The hemolytic % of ESF and TSF scaffolds was found to be 1.3 and 7.7 % respectively. The platelet adhesion on the surface of ESF scaffold was lower than that found on TSF scaffold. Better fibroblast cell attachment, binding and spreading was found on the ESF scaffold. The cell viability on ESF scaffold was 83.78 % and in TSF was 78.01 % for 48 h. The results showed that ESF electrospun scaffold can be considered as a better biomaterial for biomedical applications compared to that of TSF scaffold. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4965488/ /pubmed/27525199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40204-016-0047-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Andiappan, Muthumanickkam Kumari, Tinesh Sundaramoorthy, Subramanian Meiyazhagan, Gowri Manoharan, Prasath Venkataraman, Ganesh Comparison of eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical applications |
title | Comparison of eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical applications |
title_full | Comparison of eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical applications |
title_fullStr | Comparison of eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical applications |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical applications |
title_short | Comparison of eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical applications |
title_sort | comparison of eri and tasar silk fibroin scaffolds for biomedical applications |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4965488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27525199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40204-016-0047-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andiappanmuthumanickkam comparisonoferiandtasarsilkfibroinscaffoldsforbiomedicalapplications AT kumaritinesh comparisonoferiandtasarsilkfibroinscaffoldsforbiomedicalapplications AT sundaramoorthysubramanian comparisonoferiandtasarsilkfibroinscaffoldsforbiomedicalapplications AT meiyazhagangowri comparisonoferiandtasarsilkfibroinscaffoldsforbiomedicalapplications AT manoharanprasath comparisonoferiandtasarsilkfibroinscaffoldsforbiomedicalapplications AT venkataramanganesh comparisonoferiandtasarsilkfibroinscaffoldsforbiomedicalapplications |