Cargando…
A qualitative study examining healthcare managers and providers’ perspectives on participating in primary care implementation research
BACKGROUND: Primary care reforms should be supported by high-quality evidence across the entire life cycle of research. Front-line healthcare providers play an increasing role in implementation research. We recently evaluated two interventions for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in partnership wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4965883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27473755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1577-1 |
_version_ | 1782445331830538240 |
---|---|
author | Wozniak, Lisa A. Soprovich, Allison Rees, Sandra Johnson, Steven T. Majumdar, Sumit R. Johnson, Jeffrey A. |
author_facet | Wozniak, Lisa A. Soprovich, Allison Rees, Sandra Johnson, Steven T. Majumdar, Sumit R. Johnson, Jeffrey A. |
author_sort | Wozniak, Lisa A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Primary care reforms should be supported by high-quality evidence across the entire life cycle of research. Front-line healthcare providers play an increasing role in implementation research. We recently evaluated two interventions for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in partnership with four Primary Care Networks (PCNs) in Alberta, Canada. Here, we report healthcare professionals perspectives on participating in primary care implementation research. METHODS: Guided by the RE-AIM framework, we collected qualitative data before, during, and after both interventions. We conducted 34 in-person or telephone interviews with 17 individual PCN professionals. We used content analysis to identify emerging codes and concepts. RESULTS: Two major themes emerged from the data. First, healthcare managers were eager to conduct implementation research in a primary care setting. Second, regardless of willingness to conduct research, there were challenges to implementing experimental study designs for both interventions. PCN professionals presumed the interventions were better than usual care, expressed role conflict, and reported administrative burdens related to research participation. Perceptions of patient vulnerability and an obligation to intervene exacerbated these issues. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare professionals with limited practical research experience might not foresee the challenges in implementing experimental study designs in primary care settings to generate high-quality evidence. These issues are intensified when healthcare professionals perceive target patient populations as vulnerable and in need of intervention based on the presenting illness. Possible solutions include further research training, involving healthcare professionals in study design development, and using non-clinical staff to conduct research activities, particularly among acutely unwell patient populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4965883 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49658832016-07-30 A qualitative study examining healthcare managers and providers’ perspectives on participating in primary care implementation research Wozniak, Lisa A. Soprovich, Allison Rees, Sandra Johnson, Steven T. Majumdar, Sumit R. Johnson, Jeffrey A. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Primary care reforms should be supported by high-quality evidence across the entire life cycle of research. Front-line healthcare providers play an increasing role in implementation research. We recently evaluated two interventions for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in partnership with four Primary Care Networks (PCNs) in Alberta, Canada. Here, we report healthcare professionals perspectives on participating in primary care implementation research. METHODS: Guided by the RE-AIM framework, we collected qualitative data before, during, and after both interventions. We conducted 34 in-person or telephone interviews with 17 individual PCN professionals. We used content analysis to identify emerging codes and concepts. RESULTS: Two major themes emerged from the data. First, healthcare managers were eager to conduct implementation research in a primary care setting. Second, regardless of willingness to conduct research, there were challenges to implementing experimental study designs for both interventions. PCN professionals presumed the interventions were better than usual care, expressed role conflict, and reported administrative burdens related to research participation. Perceptions of patient vulnerability and an obligation to intervene exacerbated these issues. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare professionals with limited practical research experience might not foresee the challenges in implementing experimental study designs in primary care settings to generate high-quality evidence. These issues are intensified when healthcare professionals perceive target patient populations as vulnerable and in need of intervention based on the presenting illness. Possible solutions include further research training, involving healthcare professionals in study design development, and using non-clinical staff to conduct research activities, particularly among acutely unwell patient populations. BioMed Central 2016-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4965883/ /pubmed/27473755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1577-1 Text en © Wozniak et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wozniak, Lisa A. Soprovich, Allison Rees, Sandra Johnson, Steven T. Majumdar, Sumit R. Johnson, Jeffrey A. A qualitative study examining healthcare managers and providers’ perspectives on participating in primary care implementation research |
title | A qualitative study examining healthcare managers and providers’ perspectives on participating in primary care implementation research |
title_full | A qualitative study examining healthcare managers and providers’ perspectives on participating in primary care implementation research |
title_fullStr | A qualitative study examining healthcare managers and providers’ perspectives on participating in primary care implementation research |
title_full_unstemmed | A qualitative study examining healthcare managers and providers’ perspectives on participating in primary care implementation research |
title_short | A qualitative study examining healthcare managers and providers’ perspectives on participating in primary care implementation research |
title_sort | qualitative study examining healthcare managers and providers’ perspectives on participating in primary care implementation research |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4965883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27473755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1577-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wozniaklisaa aqualitativestudyexamininghealthcaremanagersandprovidersperspectivesonparticipatinginprimarycareimplementationresearch AT soprovichallison aqualitativestudyexamininghealthcaremanagersandprovidersperspectivesonparticipatinginprimarycareimplementationresearch AT reessandra aqualitativestudyexamininghealthcaremanagersandprovidersperspectivesonparticipatinginprimarycareimplementationresearch AT johnsonstevent aqualitativestudyexamininghealthcaremanagersandprovidersperspectivesonparticipatinginprimarycareimplementationresearch AT majumdarsumitr aqualitativestudyexamininghealthcaremanagersandprovidersperspectivesonparticipatinginprimarycareimplementationresearch AT johnsonjeffreya aqualitativestudyexamininghealthcaremanagersandprovidersperspectivesonparticipatinginprimarycareimplementationresearch AT wozniaklisaa qualitativestudyexamininghealthcaremanagersandprovidersperspectivesonparticipatinginprimarycareimplementationresearch AT soprovichallison qualitativestudyexamininghealthcaremanagersandprovidersperspectivesonparticipatinginprimarycareimplementationresearch AT reessandra qualitativestudyexamininghealthcaremanagersandprovidersperspectivesonparticipatinginprimarycareimplementationresearch AT johnsonstevent qualitativestudyexamininghealthcaremanagersandprovidersperspectivesonparticipatinginprimarycareimplementationresearch AT majumdarsumitr qualitativestudyexamininghealthcaremanagersandprovidersperspectivesonparticipatinginprimarycareimplementationresearch AT johnsonjeffreya qualitativestudyexamininghealthcaremanagersandprovidersperspectivesonparticipatinginprimarycareimplementationresearch |