Cargando…

Chronic tarsal conjunctivitis

BACKGROUND: Toxicity is rarely considered in the differential diagnosis of conjunctivitis, but we present here a new form of toxic conjunctivitis with unusual clinical features. Between 2010 and 2013, a new clinical presentation of chronic conjunctivitis unresponsive to normal treatment was noted wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cook, Nicholas, Mushtaq, Fizza, Leitner, Christina, Ilchyshyn, Andrew, Smith, George T., Cree, Ian A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4965890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27473439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0294-1
_version_ 1782445333433810944
author Cook, Nicholas
Mushtaq, Fizza
Leitner, Christina
Ilchyshyn, Andrew
Smith, George T.
Cree, Ian A.
author_facet Cook, Nicholas
Mushtaq, Fizza
Leitner, Christina
Ilchyshyn, Andrew
Smith, George T.
Cree, Ian A.
author_sort Cook, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Toxicity is rarely considered in the differential diagnosis of conjunctivitis, but we present here a new form of toxic conjunctivitis with unusual clinical features. Between 2010 and 2013, a new clinical presentation of chronic conjunctivitis unresponsive to normal treatment was noted within a Primary Care Ophthalmology Service. METHODS: Retrospective review of case records and histopathology results. RESULTS: A total of 55 adult patients, all females, presented with epiphora and stickiness. They did not complain of itch and had had symptoms for an average of 9 months. Clinical examination showed bilateral moderate to severe upper and lower tarsal conjunctival papillary reaction, without corneal or eyelid changes and mild bulbar conjunctival hyperaemia in a third of cases. Biopsies were taken in 15 cases to exclude an atypical infection or lymphoma. Histologically, there was a variable superficial stromal lymphocytic infiltrate, involving the epithelium in more severe cases. The majority of the cells were CD3 positive T-lymphocytes and follicle formation was not noted. The clinical history in all cases included prolonged use of eye make- up and other facial cosmetic products. Clinical symptoms of epiphora settled with topical steroid drops, but the clinical signs of chronic tarsal inflammation persisted until withdrawal of the facial wipes thought to contain the inciting agent, though the exact nature of this remains unclear. CONCLUSION: The presentation, appearances, histological features are consistent with a contact allergen-driven chronic conjunctivitis. Steroid treatment provided good relief of symptoms and patients were advised to avoid potential contact allergens. Management remains difficult. Further research into contact allergies of mucous membranes and identification of its allergens is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12886-016-0294-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4965890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49658902016-07-30 Chronic tarsal conjunctivitis Cook, Nicholas Mushtaq, Fizza Leitner, Christina Ilchyshyn, Andrew Smith, George T. Cree, Ian A. BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Toxicity is rarely considered in the differential diagnosis of conjunctivitis, but we present here a new form of toxic conjunctivitis with unusual clinical features. Between 2010 and 2013, a new clinical presentation of chronic conjunctivitis unresponsive to normal treatment was noted within a Primary Care Ophthalmology Service. METHODS: Retrospective review of case records and histopathology results. RESULTS: A total of 55 adult patients, all females, presented with epiphora and stickiness. They did not complain of itch and had had symptoms for an average of 9 months. Clinical examination showed bilateral moderate to severe upper and lower tarsal conjunctival papillary reaction, without corneal or eyelid changes and mild bulbar conjunctival hyperaemia in a third of cases. Biopsies were taken in 15 cases to exclude an atypical infection or lymphoma. Histologically, there was a variable superficial stromal lymphocytic infiltrate, involving the epithelium in more severe cases. The majority of the cells were CD3 positive T-lymphocytes and follicle formation was not noted. The clinical history in all cases included prolonged use of eye make- up and other facial cosmetic products. Clinical symptoms of epiphora settled with topical steroid drops, but the clinical signs of chronic tarsal inflammation persisted until withdrawal of the facial wipes thought to contain the inciting agent, though the exact nature of this remains unclear. CONCLUSION: The presentation, appearances, histological features are consistent with a contact allergen-driven chronic conjunctivitis. Steroid treatment provided good relief of symptoms and patients were advised to avoid potential contact allergens. Management remains difficult. Further research into contact allergies of mucous membranes and identification of its allergens is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12886-016-0294-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4965890/ /pubmed/27473439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0294-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cook, Nicholas
Mushtaq, Fizza
Leitner, Christina
Ilchyshyn, Andrew
Smith, George T.
Cree, Ian A.
Chronic tarsal conjunctivitis
title Chronic tarsal conjunctivitis
title_full Chronic tarsal conjunctivitis
title_fullStr Chronic tarsal conjunctivitis
title_full_unstemmed Chronic tarsal conjunctivitis
title_short Chronic tarsal conjunctivitis
title_sort chronic tarsal conjunctivitis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4965890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27473439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0294-1
work_keys_str_mv AT cooknicholas chronictarsalconjunctivitis
AT mushtaqfizza chronictarsalconjunctivitis
AT leitnerchristina chronictarsalconjunctivitis
AT ilchyshynandrew chronictarsalconjunctivitis
AT smithgeorget chronictarsalconjunctivitis
AT creeiana chronictarsalconjunctivitis