Cargando…
A modified and enhanced test setup for biomechanical investigations of the hindfoot, for example in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis
BACKGROUND: Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) using intramedullary nails is a salvage procedure for many diseases in the ankle and subtalar joint. Despite “newly described intramedullary nails” with specific anatomical shapes there still remain major complications regarding this procedure. The f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4966560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27472925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1177-6 |
_version_ | 1782445395623804928 |
---|---|
author | Evers, Julia Schulze, Martin Gehweiler, Dominic Lakemeier, Martin Raschke, Michael J. Wähnert, Dirk Ochman, Sabine |
author_facet | Evers, Julia Schulze, Martin Gehweiler, Dominic Lakemeier, Martin Raschke, Michael J. Wähnert, Dirk Ochman, Sabine |
author_sort | Evers, Julia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) using intramedullary nails is a salvage procedure for many diseases in the ankle and subtalar joint. Despite “newly described intramedullary nails” with specific anatomical shapes there still remain major complications regarding this procedure. The following study presents a modified biomechanical test setup for investigations of the hindfoot. METHODS: Nine fresh-frozen specimens from below the human knee were anaysed using the Hindfoot Arthrodesis Nail (Synthes) instrument. Quasi-static biomechanical testing was performed for internal/external rotation, varus/valgus and dorsal/plantar flexion using a modified established setup (physiological load entrance point, sledge at lever arm to apply pure moments). Additionally, a 3D optical measurement system was added to allow determination of interbony movements. RESULTS: The mean torsional range of motion (ROM) calculated from the actuator data of a material testing machine was 10.12° (SD 0.6) compared to 10° (SD 2.83) as measured with the Optotrak® system (between tibia and calcaneus). The Optotrak showed 40 % more rotation in the talocrural joint. Mean varus/valgus ROM from the material testing flexion machine was seen to be 5.65° (SD 1.84) in comparison to 2.82° (SD 0.46) measured with the Optotrak. The subtalar joint showed a 70 % higher movement when compared to the talocrural joint. Mean ROM in the flexion test was 5.3° (SD 1.45) for the material testing machine and 2.1° (SD 0.39) for the Optotrak. The movement in the talocrural joint was 3 times higher compared to the subtalar joint. CONCLUSION: The modified test setup presented here for the hindfoot allows a physiological biomechanical loading. Moreover, a detailed characterisation of the bone-implant constructs is possible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4966560 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49665602016-07-30 A modified and enhanced test setup for biomechanical investigations of the hindfoot, for example in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis Evers, Julia Schulze, Martin Gehweiler, Dominic Lakemeier, Martin Raschke, Michael J. Wähnert, Dirk Ochman, Sabine BMC Musculoskelet Disord Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) using intramedullary nails is a salvage procedure for many diseases in the ankle and subtalar joint. Despite “newly described intramedullary nails” with specific anatomical shapes there still remain major complications regarding this procedure. The following study presents a modified biomechanical test setup for investigations of the hindfoot. METHODS: Nine fresh-frozen specimens from below the human knee were anaysed using the Hindfoot Arthrodesis Nail (Synthes) instrument. Quasi-static biomechanical testing was performed for internal/external rotation, varus/valgus and dorsal/plantar flexion using a modified established setup (physiological load entrance point, sledge at lever arm to apply pure moments). Additionally, a 3D optical measurement system was added to allow determination of interbony movements. RESULTS: The mean torsional range of motion (ROM) calculated from the actuator data of a material testing machine was 10.12° (SD 0.6) compared to 10° (SD 2.83) as measured with the Optotrak® system (between tibia and calcaneus). The Optotrak showed 40 % more rotation in the talocrural joint. Mean varus/valgus ROM from the material testing flexion machine was seen to be 5.65° (SD 1.84) in comparison to 2.82° (SD 0.46) measured with the Optotrak. The subtalar joint showed a 70 % higher movement when compared to the talocrural joint. Mean ROM in the flexion test was 5.3° (SD 1.45) for the material testing machine and 2.1° (SD 0.39) for the Optotrak. The movement in the talocrural joint was 3 times higher compared to the subtalar joint. CONCLUSION: The modified test setup presented here for the hindfoot allows a physiological biomechanical loading. Moreover, a detailed characterisation of the bone-implant constructs is possible. BioMed Central 2016-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4966560/ /pubmed/27472925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1177-6 Text en © Evers et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Technical Advance Evers, Julia Schulze, Martin Gehweiler, Dominic Lakemeier, Martin Raschke, Michael J. Wähnert, Dirk Ochman, Sabine A modified and enhanced test setup for biomechanical investigations of the hindfoot, for example in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis |
title | A modified and enhanced test setup for biomechanical investigations of the hindfoot, for example in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis |
title_full | A modified and enhanced test setup for biomechanical investigations of the hindfoot, for example in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis |
title_fullStr | A modified and enhanced test setup for biomechanical investigations of the hindfoot, for example in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis |
title_full_unstemmed | A modified and enhanced test setup for biomechanical investigations of the hindfoot, for example in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis |
title_short | A modified and enhanced test setup for biomechanical investigations of the hindfoot, for example in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis |
title_sort | modified and enhanced test setup for biomechanical investigations of the hindfoot, for example in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis |
topic | Technical Advance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4966560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27472925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1177-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eversjulia amodifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis AT schulzemartin amodifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis AT gehweilerdominic amodifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis AT lakemeiermartin amodifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis AT raschkemichaelj amodifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis AT wahnertdirk amodifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis AT ochmansabine amodifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis AT eversjulia modifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis AT schulzemartin modifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis AT gehweilerdominic modifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis AT lakemeiermartin modifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis AT raschkemichaelj modifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis AT wahnertdirk modifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis AT ochmansabine modifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis |