Cargando…

A modified and enhanced test setup for biomechanical investigations of the hindfoot, for example in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis

BACKGROUND: Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) using intramedullary nails is a salvage procedure for many diseases in the ankle and subtalar joint. Despite “newly described intramedullary nails” with specific anatomical shapes there still remain major complications regarding this procedure. The f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evers, Julia, Schulze, Martin, Gehweiler, Dominic, Lakemeier, Martin, Raschke, Michael J., Wähnert, Dirk, Ochman, Sabine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4966560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27472925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1177-6
_version_ 1782445395623804928
author Evers, Julia
Schulze, Martin
Gehweiler, Dominic
Lakemeier, Martin
Raschke, Michael J.
Wähnert, Dirk
Ochman, Sabine
author_facet Evers, Julia
Schulze, Martin
Gehweiler, Dominic
Lakemeier, Martin
Raschke, Michael J.
Wähnert, Dirk
Ochman, Sabine
author_sort Evers, Julia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) using intramedullary nails is a salvage procedure for many diseases in the ankle and subtalar joint. Despite “newly described intramedullary nails” with specific anatomical shapes there still remain major complications regarding this procedure. The following study presents a modified biomechanical test setup for investigations of the hindfoot. METHODS: Nine fresh-frozen specimens from below the human knee were anaysed using the Hindfoot Arthrodesis Nail (Synthes) instrument. Quasi-static biomechanical testing was performed for internal/external rotation, varus/valgus and dorsal/plantar flexion using a modified established setup (physiological load entrance point, sledge at lever arm to apply pure moments). Additionally, a 3D optical measurement system was added to allow determination of interbony movements. RESULTS: The mean torsional range of motion (ROM) calculated from the actuator data of a material testing machine was 10.12° (SD 0.6) compared to 10° (SD 2.83) as measured with the Optotrak® system (between tibia and calcaneus). The Optotrak showed 40 % more rotation in the talocrural joint. Mean varus/valgus ROM from the material testing flexion machine was seen to be 5.65° (SD 1.84) in comparison to 2.82° (SD 0.46) measured with the Optotrak. The subtalar joint showed a 70 % higher movement when compared to the talocrural joint. Mean ROM in the flexion test was 5.3° (SD 1.45) for the material testing machine and 2.1° (SD 0.39) for the Optotrak. The movement in the talocrural joint was 3 times higher compared to the subtalar joint. CONCLUSION: The modified test setup presented here for the hindfoot allows a physiological biomechanical loading. Moreover, a detailed characterisation of the bone-implant constructs is possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4966560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49665602016-07-30 A modified and enhanced test setup for biomechanical investigations of the hindfoot, for example in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis Evers, Julia Schulze, Martin Gehweiler, Dominic Lakemeier, Martin Raschke, Michael J. Wähnert, Dirk Ochman, Sabine BMC Musculoskelet Disord Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) using intramedullary nails is a salvage procedure for many diseases in the ankle and subtalar joint. Despite “newly described intramedullary nails” with specific anatomical shapes there still remain major complications regarding this procedure. The following study presents a modified biomechanical test setup for investigations of the hindfoot. METHODS: Nine fresh-frozen specimens from below the human knee were anaysed using the Hindfoot Arthrodesis Nail (Synthes) instrument. Quasi-static biomechanical testing was performed for internal/external rotation, varus/valgus and dorsal/plantar flexion using a modified established setup (physiological load entrance point, sledge at lever arm to apply pure moments). Additionally, a 3D optical measurement system was added to allow determination of interbony movements. RESULTS: The mean torsional range of motion (ROM) calculated from the actuator data of a material testing machine was 10.12° (SD 0.6) compared to 10° (SD 2.83) as measured with the Optotrak® system (between tibia and calcaneus). The Optotrak showed 40 % more rotation in the talocrural joint. Mean varus/valgus ROM from the material testing flexion machine was seen to be 5.65° (SD 1.84) in comparison to 2.82° (SD 0.46) measured with the Optotrak. The subtalar joint showed a 70 % higher movement when compared to the talocrural joint. Mean ROM in the flexion test was 5.3° (SD 1.45) for the material testing machine and 2.1° (SD 0.39) for the Optotrak. The movement in the talocrural joint was 3 times higher compared to the subtalar joint. CONCLUSION: The modified test setup presented here for the hindfoot allows a physiological biomechanical loading. Moreover, a detailed characterisation of the bone-implant constructs is possible. BioMed Central 2016-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4966560/ /pubmed/27472925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1177-6 Text en © Evers et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Evers, Julia
Schulze, Martin
Gehweiler, Dominic
Lakemeier, Martin
Raschke, Michael J.
Wähnert, Dirk
Ochman, Sabine
A modified and enhanced test setup for biomechanical investigations of the hindfoot, for example in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis
title A modified and enhanced test setup for biomechanical investigations of the hindfoot, for example in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis
title_full A modified and enhanced test setup for biomechanical investigations of the hindfoot, for example in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis
title_fullStr A modified and enhanced test setup for biomechanical investigations of the hindfoot, for example in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis
title_full_unstemmed A modified and enhanced test setup for biomechanical investigations of the hindfoot, for example in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis
title_short A modified and enhanced test setup for biomechanical investigations of the hindfoot, for example in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis
title_sort modified and enhanced test setup for biomechanical investigations of the hindfoot, for example in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4966560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27472925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1177-6
work_keys_str_mv AT eversjulia amodifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis
AT schulzemartin amodifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis
AT gehweilerdominic amodifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis
AT lakemeiermartin amodifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis
AT raschkemichaelj amodifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis
AT wahnertdirk amodifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis
AT ochmansabine amodifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis
AT eversjulia modifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis
AT schulzemartin modifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis
AT gehweilerdominic modifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis
AT lakemeiermartin modifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis
AT raschkemichaelj modifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis
AT wahnertdirk modifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis
AT ochmansabine modifiedandenhancedtestsetupforbiomechanicalinvestigationsofthehindfootforexampleintibiotalocalcanealarthrodesis