Cargando…
The development of PubMed search strategies for patient preferences for treatment outcomes
BACKGROUND: The importance of respecting patients’ preferences when making treatment decisions is increasingly recognized. Efficiently retrieving papers from the scientific literature reporting on the presence and nature of such preferences can help to achieve this goal. The objective of this study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4966584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27473226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0192-5 |
_version_ | 1782445400905482240 |
---|---|
author | van Hoorn, Ralph Kievit, Wietske Booth, Andrew Mozygemba, Kati Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke Refolo, Pietro Sacchini, Dario Gerhardus, Ansgar van der Wilt, Gert Jan Tummers, Marcia |
author_facet | van Hoorn, Ralph Kievit, Wietske Booth, Andrew Mozygemba, Kati Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke Refolo, Pietro Sacchini, Dario Gerhardus, Ansgar van der Wilt, Gert Jan Tummers, Marcia |
author_sort | van Hoorn, Ralph |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The importance of respecting patients’ preferences when making treatment decisions is increasingly recognized. Efficiently retrieving papers from the scientific literature reporting on the presence and nature of such preferences can help to achieve this goal. The objective of this study was to create a search filter for PubMed to help retrieve evidence on patient preferences for treatment outcomes. METHODS: A total of 27 journals were hand-searched for articles on patient preferences for treatment outcomes published in 2011. Selected articles served as a reference set. To develop optimal search strategies to retrieve this set, all articles in the reference set were randomly split into a development and a validation set. MeSH-terms and keywords retrieved using PubReMiner were tested individually and as combinations in PubMed and evaluated for retrieval performance (e.g. sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp)). RESULTS: Of 8238 articles, 22 were considered to report empirical evidence on patient preferences for specific treatment outcomes. The best search filters reached Se of 100 % [95 % CI 100-100] with Sp of 95 % [94–95 %] and Sp of 97 % [97–98 %] with 75 % Se [74–76 %]. In the validation set these queries reached values of Se of 90 % [89–91 %] with Sp 94 % [93–95 %] and Se of 80 % [79–81 %] with Sp of 97 % [96–96 %], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Narrow and broad search queries were developed which can help in retrieving literature on patient preferences for treatment outcomes. Identifying such evidence may in turn enhance the incorporation of patient preferences in clinical decision making and health technology assessment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0192-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4966584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49665842016-07-30 The development of PubMed search strategies for patient preferences for treatment outcomes van Hoorn, Ralph Kievit, Wietske Booth, Andrew Mozygemba, Kati Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke Refolo, Pietro Sacchini, Dario Gerhardus, Ansgar van der Wilt, Gert Jan Tummers, Marcia BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: The importance of respecting patients’ preferences when making treatment decisions is increasingly recognized. Efficiently retrieving papers from the scientific literature reporting on the presence and nature of such preferences can help to achieve this goal. The objective of this study was to create a search filter for PubMed to help retrieve evidence on patient preferences for treatment outcomes. METHODS: A total of 27 journals were hand-searched for articles on patient preferences for treatment outcomes published in 2011. Selected articles served as a reference set. To develop optimal search strategies to retrieve this set, all articles in the reference set were randomly split into a development and a validation set. MeSH-terms and keywords retrieved using PubReMiner were tested individually and as combinations in PubMed and evaluated for retrieval performance (e.g. sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp)). RESULTS: Of 8238 articles, 22 were considered to report empirical evidence on patient preferences for specific treatment outcomes. The best search filters reached Se of 100 % [95 % CI 100-100] with Sp of 95 % [94–95 %] and Sp of 97 % [97–98 %] with 75 % Se [74–76 %]. In the validation set these queries reached values of Se of 90 % [89–91 %] with Sp 94 % [93–95 %] and Se of 80 % [79–81 %] with Sp of 97 % [96–96 %], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Narrow and broad search queries were developed which can help in retrieving literature on patient preferences for treatment outcomes. Identifying such evidence may in turn enhance the incorporation of patient preferences in clinical decision making and health technology assessment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0192-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4966584/ /pubmed/27473226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0192-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van Hoorn, Ralph Kievit, Wietske Booth, Andrew Mozygemba, Kati Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke Refolo, Pietro Sacchini, Dario Gerhardus, Ansgar van der Wilt, Gert Jan Tummers, Marcia The development of PubMed search strategies for patient preferences for treatment outcomes |
title | The development of PubMed search strategies for patient preferences for treatment outcomes |
title_full | The development of PubMed search strategies for patient preferences for treatment outcomes |
title_fullStr | The development of PubMed search strategies for patient preferences for treatment outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | The development of PubMed search strategies for patient preferences for treatment outcomes |
title_short | The development of PubMed search strategies for patient preferences for treatment outcomes |
title_sort | development of pubmed search strategies for patient preferences for treatment outcomes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4966584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27473226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0192-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanhoornralph thedevelopmentofpubmedsearchstrategiesforpatientpreferencesfortreatmentoutcomes AT kievitwietske thedevelopmentofpubmedsearchstrategiesforpatientpreferencesfortreatmentoutcomes AT boothandrew thedevelopmentofpubmedsearchstrategiesforpatientpreferencesfortreatmentoutcomes AT mozygembakati thedevelopmentofpubmedsearchstrategiesforpatientpreferencesfortreatmentoutcomes AT lysdahlkristinbakke thedevelopmentofpubmedsearchstrategiesforpatientpreferencesfortreatmentoutcomes AT refolopietro thedevelopmentofpubmedsearchstrategiesforpatientpreferencesfortreatmentoutcomes AT sacchinidario thedevelopmentofpubmedsearchstrategiesforpatientpreferencesfortreatmentoutcomes AT gerhardusansgar thedevelopmentofpubmedsearchstrategiesforpatientpreferencesfortreatmentoutcomes AT vanderwiltgertjan thedevelopmentofpubmedsearchstrategiesforpatientpreferencesfortreatmentoutcomes AT tummersmarcia thedevelopmentofpubmedsearchstrategiesforpatientpreferencesfortreatmentoutcomes AT vanhoornralph developmentofpubmedsearchstrategiesforpatientpreferencesfortreatmentoutcomes AT kievitwietske developmentofpubmedsearchstrategiesforpatientpreferencesfortreatmentoutcomes AT boothandrew developmentofpubmedsearchstrategiesforpatientpreferencesfortreatmentoutcomes AT mozygembakati developmentofpubmedsearchstrategiesforpatientpreferencesfortreatmentoutcomes AT lysdahlkristinbakke developmentofpubmedsearchstrategiesforpatientpreferencesfortreatmentoutcomes AT refolopietro developmentofpubmedsearchstrategiesforpatientpreferencesfortreatmentoutcomes AT sacchinidario developmentofpubmedsearchstrategiesforpatientpreferencesfortreatmentoutcomes AT gerhardusansgar developmentofpubmedsearchstrategiesforpatientpreferencesfortreatmentoutcomes AT vanderwiltgertjan developmentofpubmedsearchstrategiesforpatientpreferencesfortreatmentoutcomes AT tummersmarcia developmentofpubmedsearchstrategiesforpatientpreferencesfortreatmentoutcomes |