Cargando…
Comparison between adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: Adherence to treatment has been defined as the degree to which a patient’s behavior corresponds to medical or health advice; however, the most appropriate method to evaluate adherence to diabetes care has yet to be identified. We conducted analyses to compare adherence assessments and bl...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4966590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27478510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-016-0162-4 |
_version_ | 1782445402310574080 |
---|---|
author | Telo, Gabriela Heiden de Souza, Martina Schaan Andrade, Thais Stürmer Schaan, Beatriz D’Agord |
author_facet | Telo, Gabriela Heiden de Souza, Martina Schaan Andrade, Thais Stürmer Schaan, Beatriz D’Agord |
author_sort | Telo, Gabriela Heiden |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Adherence to treatment has been defined as the degree to which a patient’s behavior corresponds to medical or health advice; however, the most appropriate method to evaluate adherence to diabetes care has yet to be identified. We conducted analyses to compare adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures with regard to their ability to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: We analyzed four instruments to evaluate adherence: Self-Care Inventory-Revised, a self-administered survey; Diabetes Self-Monitoring Profile (DSMP), administered by trained researchers; a categorical (yes/no/sometimes) adherence self-evaluation; and a continuous (0–100) adherence self-evaluation. Blood glucose monitoring frequency was evaluated by self-report, diary, and meter download. RESULTS: Participants (n = 82) were aged 39.0 ± 13.1 years with a mean diabetes duration of 21.2 ± 11.1 years; 27 % monitored blood glucose >4 times/day. The DSMP score was the strongest predictor of glycemic control (r = −0.32, P = 0.004) among adherence assessments, while blood glucose monitoring frequency assessed by meter download was the strongest predictor among blood glucose monitoring measures (r = −40, P < 0.001). All the self-report assessments had a significant but weak correlation with glycemic control (r ≤ 0.28, P ≤ 0.02). The final adjusted model identified the assessment of blood glucose monitoring frequency by meter download as the most robust predictor of HbA1c (estimate effect size = −0.58, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In efforts to evaluate adherence, blood glucose monitoring frequency assessed by meter download has the strongest relationship with glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4966590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49665902016-07-30 Comparison between adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional study Telo, Gabriela Heiden de Souza, Martina Schaan Andrade, Thais Stürmer Schaan, Beatriz D’Agord Diabetol Metab Syndr Research BACKGROUND: Adherence to treatment has been defined as the degree to which a patient’s behavior corresponds to medical or health advice; however, the most appropriate method to evaluate adherence to diabetes care has yet to be identified. We conducted analyses to compare adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures with regard to their ability to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: We analyzed four instruments to evaluate adherence: Self-Care Inventory-Revised, a self-administered survey; Diabetes Self-Monitoring Profile (DSMP), administered by trained researchers; a categorical (yes/no/sometimes) adherence self-evaluation; and a continuous (0–100) adherence self-evaluation. Blood glucose monitoring frequency was evaluated by self-report, diary, and meter download. RESULTS: Participants (n = 82) were aged 39.0 ± 13.1 years with a mean diabetes duration of 21.2 ± 11.1 years; 27 % monitored blood glucose >4 times/day. The DSMP score was the strongest predictor of glycemic control (r = −0.32, P = 0.004) among adherence assessments, while blood glucose monitoring frequency assessed by meter download was the strongest predictor among blood glucose monitoring measures (r = −40, P < 0.001). All the self-report assessments had a significant but weak correlation with glycemic control (r ≤ 0.28, P ≤ 0.02). The final adjusted model identified the assessment of blood glucose monitoring frequency by meter download as the most robust predictor of HbA1c (estimate effect size = −0.58, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In efforts to evaluate adherence, blood glucose monitoring frequency assessed by meter download has the strongest relationship with glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes. BioMed Central 2016-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4966590/ /pubmed/27478510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-016-0162-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Telo, Gabriela Heiden de Souza, Martina Schaan Andrade, Thais Stürmer Schaan, Beatriz D’Agord Comparison between adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional study |
title | Comparison between adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Comparison between adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Comparison between adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Comparison between adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | comparison between adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4966590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27478510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-016-0162-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT telogabrielaheiden comparisonbetweenadherenceassessmentsandbloodglucosemonitoringmeasurestopredictglycemiccontrolinadultswithtype1diabetesacrosssectionalstudy AT desouzamartinaschaan comparisonbetweenadherenceassessmentsandbloodglucosemonitoringmeasurestopredictglycemiccontrolinadultswithtype1diabetesacrosssectionalstudy AT andradethaissturmer comparisonbetweenadherenceassessmentsandbloodglucosemonitoringmeasurestopredictglycemiccontrolinadultswithtype1diabetesacrosssectionalstudy AT schaanbeatrizdagord comparisonbetweenadherenceassessmentsandbloodglucosemonitoringmeasurestopredictglycemiccontrolinadultswithtype1diabetesacrosssectionalstudy |