Cargando…
A comparison of the ability of the human IgG1 allotypes G1m3 and G1m1,17 to stimulate T-cell responses from allotype matched and mismatched donors
The immunogenicity of clinically administered antibodies has clinical implications for the patients receiving them, ranging from mild consequences, such as increased clearance of the drug from the circulation, to life-threatening effects. The emergence of methods to engineer variable regions resulti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4966604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26821574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2015.1128605 |
_version_ | 1782445405118660608 |
---|---|
author | Webster, Carl I. Bryson, Christine J. Cloake, Edward A. Jones, Tim D. Austin, Mark J. Karle, Anette C. Spindeldreher, Sebastian Lowe, David C. Baker, Matthew P. |
author_facet | Webster, Carl I. Bryson, Christine J. Cloake, Edward A. Jones, Tim D. Austin, Mark J. Karle, Anette C. Spindeldreher, Sebastian Lowe, David C. Baker, Matthew P. |
author_sort | Webster, Carl I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The immunogenicity of clinically administered antibodies has clinical implications for the patients receiving them, ranging from mild consequences, such as increased clearance of the drug from the circulation, to life-threatening effects. The emergence of methods to engineer variable regions resulting in the generation of humanised and fully human antibodies as therapeutics has reduced the potential for adverse immunogenicity. However, due to differences in sequence referred to as allotypic variation, antibody constant regions are not homogeneous within the human population, even within sub-classes of the same immunoglobulin isotype. For therapeutically administered antibodies, the potential exists for an immune response from the patient to the antibody if the allotype of patient and antibody do not match. Allotypic distribution in the human population varies within and across ethnic groups making the choice of allotype for a therapeutic antibody difficult. This study investigated the potential of human IgG1 allotypes to stimulate responses in human CD4(+) T cells from donors matched for homologous and heterologous IgG1 allotypes. Allotypic variants of the therapeutic monoclonal antibody trastuzumab were administered to genetically defined allotypic matched and mismatched donor T cells. No significant responses were observed in the mismatched T cells. To investigate the lack of T-cell responses in relation to mismatched allotypes, HLA-DR agretopes were identified via MHC associated peptide proteomics (MAPPs). As expected, many HLA-DR restricted peptides were presented. However, there were no peptides presented from the sequence regions containing the allotypic variations. Taken together, the results from the T-cell assay and MAPPs assay indicate that the allotypic differences in human IgG1 do not represent a significant risk for induction of immunogenicity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4966604 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49666042016-08-24 A comparison of the ability of the human IgG1 allotypes G1m3 and G1m1,17 to stimulate T-cell responses from allotype matched and mismatched donors Webster, Carl I. Bryson, Christine J. Cloake, Edward A. Jones, Tim D. Austin, Mark J. Karle, Anette C. Spindeldreher, Sebastian Lowe, David C. Baker, Matthew P. MAbs Report The immunogenicity of clinically administered antibodies has clinical implications for the patients receiving them, ranging from mild consequences, such as increased clearance of the drug from the circulation, to life-threatening effects. The emergence of methods to engineer variable regions resulting in the generation of humanised and fully human antibodies as therapeutics has reduced the potential for adverse immunogenicity. However, due to differences in sequence referred to as allotypic variation, antibody constant regions are not homogeneous within the human population, even within sub-classes of the same immunoglobulin isotype. For therapeutically administered antibodies, the potential exists for an immune response from the patient to the antibody if the allotype of patient and antibody do not match. Allotypic distribution in the human population varies within and across ethnic groups making the choice of allotype for a therapeutic antibody difficult. This study investigated the potential of human IgG1 allotypes to stimulate responses in human CD4(+) T cells from donors matched for homologous and heterologous IgG1 allotypes. Allotypic variants of the therapeutic monoclonal antibody trastuzumab were administered to genetically defined allotypic matched and mismatched donor T cells. No significant responses were observed in the mismatched T cells. To investigate the lack of T-cell responses in relation to mismatched allotypes, HLA-DR agretopes were identified via MHC associated peptide proteomics (MAPPs). As expected, many HLA-DR restricted peptides were presented. However, there were no peptides presented from the sequence regions containing the allotypic variations. Taken together, the results from the T-cell assay and MAPPs assay indicate that the allotypic differences in human IgG1 do not represent a significant risk for induction of immunogenicity. Taylor & Francis 2016-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4966604/ /pubmed/26821574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2015.1128605 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted. |
spellingShingle | Report Webster, Carl I. Bryson, Christine J. Cloake, Edward A. Jones, Tim D. Austin, Mark J. Karle, Anette C. Spindeldreher, Sebastian Lowe, David C. Baker, Matthew P. A comparison of the ability of the human IgG1 allotypes G1m3 and G1m1,17 to stimulate T-cell responses from allotype matched and mismatched donors |
title | A comparison of the ability of the human IgG1 allotypes G1m3 and G1m1,17 to stimulate T-cell responses from allotype matched and mismatched donors |
title_full | A comparison of the ability of the human IgG1 allotypes G1m3 and G1m1,17 to stimulate T-cell responses from allotype matched and mismatched donors |
title_fullStr | A comparison of the ability of the human IgG1 allotypes G1m3 and G1m1,17 to stimulate T-cell responses from allotype matched and mismatched donors |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of the ability of the human IgG1 allotypes G1m3 and G1m1,17 to stimulate T-cell responses from allotype matched and mismatched donors |
title_short | A comparison of the ability of the human IgG1 allotypes G1m3 and G1m1,17 to stimulate T-cell responses from allotype matched and mismatched donors |
title_sort | comparison of the ability of the human igg1 allotypes g1m3 and g1m1,17 to stimulate t-cell responses from allotype matched and mismatched donors |
topic | Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4966604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26821574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2015.1128605 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT webstercarli acomparisonoftheabilityofthehumanigg1allotypesg1m3andg1m117tostimulatetcellresponsesfromallotypematchedandmismatcheddonors AT brysonchristinej acomparisonoftheabilityofthehumanigg1allotypesg1m3andg1m117tostimulatetcellresponsesfromallotypematchedandmismatcheddonors AT cloakeedwarda acomparisonoftheabilityofthehumanigg1allotypesg1m3andg1m117tostimulatetcellresponsesfromallotypematchedandmismatcheddonors AT jonestimd acomparisonoftheabilityofthehumanigg1allotypesg1m3andg1m117tostimulatetcellresponsesfromallotypematchedandmismatcheddonors AT austinmarkj acomparisonoftheabilityofthehumanigg1allotypesg1m3andg1m117tostimulatetcellresponsesfromallotypematchedandmismatcheddonors AT karleanettec acomparisonoftheabilityofthehumanigg1allotypesg1m3andg1m117tostimulatetcellresponsesfromallotypematchedandmismatcheddonors AT spindeldrehersebastian acomparisonoftheabilityofthehumanigg1allotypesg1m3andg1m117tostimulatetcellresponsesfromallotypematchedandmismatcheddonors AT lowedavidc acomparisonoftheabilityofthehumanigg1allotypesg1m3andg1m117tostimulatetcellresponsesfromallotypematchedandmismatcheddonors AT bakermatthewp acomparisonoftheabilityofthehumanigg1allotypesg1m3andg1m117tostimulatetcellresponsesfromallotypematchedandmismatcheddonors AT webstercarli comparisonoftheabilityofthehumanigg1allotypesg1m3andg1m117tostimulatetcellresponsesfromallotypematchedandmismatcheddonors AT brysonchristinej comparisonoftheabilityofthehumanigg1allotypesg1m3andg1m117tostimulatetcellresponsesfromallotypematchedandmismatcheddonors AT cloakeedwarda comparisonoftheabilityofthehumanigg1allotypesg1m3andg1m117tostimulatetcellresponsesfromallotypematchedandmismatcheddonors AT jonestimd comparisonoftheabilityofthehumanigg1allotypesg1m3andg1m117tostimulatetcellresponsesfromallotypematchedandmismatcheddonors AT austinmarkj comparisonoftheabilityofthehumanigg1allotypesg1m3andg1m117tostimulatetcellresponsesfromallotypematchedandmismatcheddonors AT karleanettec comparisonoftheabilityofthehumanigg1allotypesg1m3andg1m117tostimulatetcellresponsesfromallotypematchedandmismatcheddonors AT spindeldrehersebastian comparisonoftheabilityofthehumanigg1allotypesg1m3andg1m117tostimulatetcellresponsesfromallotypematchedandmismatcheddonors AT lowedavidc comparisonoftheabilityofthehumanigg1allotypesg1m3andg1m117tostimulatetcellresponsesfromallotypematchedandmismatcheddonors AT bakermatthewp comparisonoftheabilityofthehumanigg1allotypesg1m3andg1m117tostimulatetcellresponsesfromallotypematchedandmismatcheddonors |