Cargando…

Prognostic factors after pulmonary metastasectomy of colorectal cancers: influence of liver metastasis

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to evaluate the influence of liver metastasis on survival after pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a total of 524 patients and were classified into two groups based on the presence of liver metastasis....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Seok, Kim, Hong Kwan, Cho, Jong Ho, Choi, Yong Soo, Kim, Kwhanmien, Kim, Jhingook, Zo, Jae Ill, Shim, Young Mog, Heo, Jin Seok, Lee, Woo Yong, Kim, Hee Cheol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4966704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27473725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0940-3
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Our objective was to evaluate the influence of liver metastasis on survival after pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a total of 524 patients and were classified into two groups based on the presence of liver metastasis. Group HM + PM (n = 106) included patients who previously received a hepatic metastasectomy and then received pulmonary metastasectomy. Group PM (n = 418) included patients who only received pulmonary metastasectomy with no liver metastasis. RESULTS: There were more male patients (70 vs. 57 %; P = 0.02) and more patients with colon cancer (60 vs. 42 %, P = 0.001) in group HM + PM than in group PM. Otherwise, there was no significant difference between the two groups in clinicopathologic characteristics and extent of surgery. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 58 and 31 %, respectively. There was no significant difference in OS (group HM + PM, 54 % vs. group PM, 59 %; P = 0.085) and in DFS (group HM + PM, 28 % vs. group PM, 32 %; P = 0.12). For the entire patient cohort, a multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of liver metastasis, CRC T and N stages, disease-free interval, and number and size of lung metastases were significantly associated with OS and DFS. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that previous or present liver metastasis should not exclude a patient from pulmonary metastasectomy. When lung metastasis is detected in patients with a history of hepatic metastasectomy, pulmonary metastasectomy is still a viable treatment option especially in patients with a long disease-free interval and a small number of lung metastases.