Cargando…

The role of boundary spanners in delivering collaborative care: a process evaluation

BACKGROUND: On average, people with schizophrenia and psychosis die 13–30 years sooner than the general population (World Psychiatry 10 (1):52–77, 2011). Mental and physical health care is often provided by different organisations, different practitioners and in different settings which makes collab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hunt, Carianne M., Spence, Michael, McBride, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4966858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27473529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0501-4
_version_ 1782445446120079360
author Hunt, Carianne M.
Spence, Michael
McBride, Anne
author_facet Hunt, Carianne M.
Spence, Michael
McBride, Anne
author_sort Hunt, Carianne M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: On average, people with schizophrenia and psychosis die 13–30 years sooner than the general population (World Psychiatry 10 (1):52–77, 2011). Mental and physical health care is often provided by different organisations, different practitioners and in different settings which makes collaborative care difficult. Research is needed to understand and map the impact of new collaborative ways of working at the primary/secondary care interface (PloS One 7 (5); e36468). The evaluation presented in this paper was designed to explore the potential of a Community and Physical Health Co-ordinator role (CPHC) (CPHCs were previously Care Co-ordinators within the Community Mental Health Team, Community in the title CPHC refers to Community Mental Health) and Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) meetings across primary and community care, with the aim of improving collaboration of mental and physical health care for service users with Severe Mental Illness (SMI). METHODS: Data collection took place across five general practices (GPs) and a Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) in the Northwest of England, as part of a process evaluation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of GP staff (n= 18) and CMHT staff (n=4), a focus group with CMHT staff (n=8) and a survey completed by 13 CMHT staff, alongside cardiovascular risk data and MDT actions. Framework analysis was used to manage and interpret data. RESULTS: The results from the evaluation demonstrate that a CPHC role and MDT meetings are effective mechanisms for improving the collaboration and co-ordination of physical health care for SMI service users. The findings highlight the importance of embedding and supporting the CPHC role, with an emphasis on protected time and continuing professional roles and integrating multiple perspectives through MDT meetings. Considering the importance of physical health care for SMI service users and the complex environment, these are important findings for practitioners, researchers and policy makers in the field of primary care and mental health. CONCLUSION: There is an increasing focus on integration and collaborative working to ensure the delivery of quality care across the whole patient pathway, with a growing need for professionals to work together across service and professional boundaries. The introduction of a two pronged approach to collaboration has shown some important improvements in the management of physical health care for service users with SMI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4966858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49668582016-07-30 The role of boundary spanners in delivering collaborative care: a process evaluation Hunt, Carianne M. Spence, Michael McBride, Anne BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: On average, people with schizophrenia and psychosis die 13–30 years sooner than the general population (World Psychiatry 10 (1):52–77, 2011). Mental and physical health care is often provided by different organisations, different practitioners and in different settings which makes collaborative care difficult. Research is needed to understand and map the impact of new collaborative ways of working at the primary/secondary care interface (PloS One 7 (5); e36468). The evaluation presented in this paper was designed to explore the potential of a Community and Physical Health Co-ordinator role (CPHC) (CPHCs were previously Care Co-ordinators within the Community Mental Health Team, Community in the title CPHC refers to Community Mental Health) and Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) meetings across primary and community care, with the aim of improving collaboration of mental and physical health care for service users with Severe Mental Illness (SMI). METHODS: Data collection took place across five general practices (GPs) and a Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) in the Northwest of England, as part of a process evaluation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of GP staff (n= 18) and CMHT staff (n=4), a focus group with CMHT staff (n=8) and a survey completed by 13 CMHT staff, alongside cardiovascular risk data and MDT actions. Framework analysis was used to manage and interpret data. RESULTS: The results from the evaluation demonstrate that a CPHC role and MDT meetings are effective mechanisms for improving the collaboration and co-ordination of physical health care for SMI service users. The findings highlight the importance of embedding and supporting the CPHC role, with an emphasis on protected time and continuing professional roles and integrating multiple perspectives through MDT meetings. Considering the importance of physical health care for SMI service users and the complex environment, these are important findings for practitioners, researchers and policy makers in the field of primary care and mental health. CONCLUSION: There is an increasing focus on integration and collaborative working to ensure the delivery of quality care across the whole patient pathway, with a growing need for professionals to work together across service and professional boundaries. The introduction of a two pronged approach to collaboration has shown some important improvements in the management of physical health care for service users with SMI. BioMed Central 2016-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4966858/ /pubmed/27473529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0501-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hunt, Carianne M.
Spence, Michael
McBride, Anne
The role of boundary spanners in delivering collaborative care: a process evaluation
title The role of boundary spanners in delivering collaborative care: a process evaluation
title_full The role of boundary spanners in delivering collaborative care: a process evaluation
title_fullStr The role of boundary spanners in delivering collaborative care: a process evaluation
title_full_unstemmed The role of boundary spanners in delivering collaborative care: a process evaluation
title_short The role of boundary spanners in delivering collaborative care: a process evaluation
title_sort role of boundary spanners in delivering collaborative care: a process evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4966858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27473529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0501-4
work_keys_str_mv AT huntcariannem theroleofboundaryspannersindeliveringcollaborativecareaprocessevaluation
AT spencemichael theroleofboundaryspannersindeliveringcollaborativecareaprocessevaluation
AT mcbrideanne theroleofboundaryspannersindeliveringcollaborativecareaprocessevaluation
AT huntcariannem roleofboundaryspannersindeliveringcollaborativecareaprocessevaluation
AT spencemichael roleofboundaryspannersindeliveringcollaborativecareaprocessevaluation
AT mcbrideanne roleofboundaryspannersindeliveringcollaborativecareaprocessevaluation