Cargando…

The Differential Response of Proteins to Macromolecular Crowding

The habitat in which proteins exert their function contains up to 400 g/L of macromolecules, most of which are proteins. The repercussions of this dense environment on protein behavior are often overlooked or addressed using synthetic agents such as poly(ethylene glycol), whose ability to mimic prot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Candotti, Michela, Orozco, Modesto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4966950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27471851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005040
_version_ 1782445460719403008
author Candotti, Michela
Orozco, Modesto
author_facet Candotti, Michela
Orozco, Modesto
author_sort Candotti, Michela
collection PubMed
description The habitat in which proteins exert their function contains up to 400 g/L of macromolecules, most of which are proteins. The repercussions of this dense environment on protein behavior are often overlooked or addressed using synthetic agents such as poly(ethylene glycol), whose ability to mimic protein crowders has not been demonstrated. Here we performed a comprehensive atomistic molecular dynamic analysis of the effect of protein crowders on the structure and dynamics of three proteins, namely an intrinsically disordered protein (ACTR), a molten globule conformation (NCBD), and a one-fold structure (IRF-3) protein. We found that crowding does not stabilize the native compact structure, and, in fact, often prevents structural collapse. Poly(ethylene glycol) PEG500 failed to reproduce many aspects of the physiologically-relevant protein crowders, thus indicating its unsuitability to mimic the cell interior. Instead, the impact of protein crowding on the structure and dynamics of a protein depends on its degree of disorder and results from two competing effects: the excluded volume, which favors compact states, and quinary interactions, which favor extended conformers. Such a viscous environment slows down protein flexibility and restricts the conformational landscape, often biasing it towards bioactive conformations but hindering biologically relevant protein-protein contacts. Overall, the protein crowders used here act as unspecific chaperons that modulate the protein conformational space, thus having relevant consequences for disordered proteins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4966950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49669502016-08-18 The Differential Response of Proteins to Macromolecular Crowding Candotti, Michela Orozco, Modesto PLoS Comput Biol Research Article The habitat in which proteins exert their function contains up to 400 g/L of macromolecules, most of which are proteins. The repercussions of this dense environment on protein behavior are often overlooked or addressed using synthetic agents such as poly(ethylene glycol), whose ability to mimic protein crowders has not been demonstrated. Here we performed a comprehensive atomistic molecular dynamic analysis of the effect of protein crowders on the structure and dynamics of three proteins, namely an intrinsically disordered protein (ACTR), a molten globule conformation (NCBD), and a one-fold structure (IRF-3) protein. We found that crowding does not stabilize the native compact structure, and, in fact, often prevents structural collapse. Poly(ethylene glycol) PEG500 failed to reproduce many aspects of the physiologically-relevant protein crowders, thus indicating its unsuitability to mimic the cell interior. Instead, the impact of protein crowding on the structure and dynamics of a protein depends on its degree of disorder and results from two competing effects: the excluded volume, which favors compact states, and quinary interactions, which favor extended conformers. Such a viscous environment slows down protein flexibility and restricts the conformational landscape, often biasing it towards bioactive conformations but hindering biologically relevant protein-protein contacts. Overall, the protein crowders used here act as unspecific chaperons that modulate the protein conformational space, thus having relevant consequences for disordered proteins. Public Library of Science 2016-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4966950/ /pubmed/27471851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005040 Text en © 2016 Candotti, Orozco http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Candotti, Michela
Orozco, Modesto
The Differential Response of Proteins to Macromolecular Crowding
title The Differential Response of Proteins to Macromolecular Crowding
title_full The Differential Response of Proteins to Macromolecular Crowding
title_fullStr The Differential Response of Proteins to Macromolecular Crowding
title_full_unstemmed The Differential Response of Proteins to Macromolecular Crowding
title_short The Differential Response of Proteins to Macromolecular Crowding
title_sort differential response of proteins to macromolecular crowding
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4966950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27471851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005040
work_keys_str_mv AT candottimichela thedifferentialresponseofproteinstomacromolecularcrowding
AT orozcomodesto thedifferentialresponseofproteinstomacromolecularcrowding
AT candottimichela differentialresponseofproteinstomacromolecularcrowding
AT orozcomodesto differentialresponseofproteinstomacromolecularcrowding