Cargando…

Nationwide review of mixed and non-mixed components from different manufacturers in total hip arthroplasty: A Dutch Arthroplasty Register study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Combining components from different manufacturers in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is common practice worldwide. We determined the proportion of THAs used in the Netherlands that consist of components from different manufacturers, and compared the revision rates of these mixed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Peters, Rinne M, van Steenbergen, Liza N, Bulstra, Sjoerd K, Zeegers, Adelgunde V C M, Stewart, Roy E, Poolman, Rudolf W, Hosman, Anton H
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Taylor & Francis 2016
Materias:	Articles
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4967277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27348544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1194128

Ejemplares similares

The effect of bearing type on the outcome of total hip arthroplasty: Analysis of 209,912 primary total hip arthroplasties registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
por: Peters, Rinne M, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

To mix or not to mix? Medicolegal implications of mixed components in total hip arthroplasty
por: Peters, Rinne M, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The learning curve of the direct anterior approach is 100 cases: an analysis based on 15,875 total hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
por: PETERS, Rinne M, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Revision risk by using the direct superior approach (DSA) for total hip arthroplasty compared with postero-lateral approach: early nationwide results from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI)
por: VAN DOOREN, Bart, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Total hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) and the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA): comparison of patient and procedure characteristics in 475,685 cases
por: Van Steenbergen, Liza N, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years: an analysis of 1,037 revisions in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
por: Kuijpers, Martijn F L, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Nationwide review of mixed and non-mixed components from different manufacturers in total hip arthroplasty
Publicado: (2016)

Low revision rate of dual mobility cups after arthroplasty for acute hip fractures: report of 11,857 hip fractures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2007–2019)
por: Bloemheuvel, Esther M, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Managing persistent wound leakage after total knee and hip arthroplasty. Results of a nationwide survey among Dutch orthopaedic surgeons
por: Wagenaar, Frank-Christiaan, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Similar revision rate after cemented and cementless femoral revisions for periprosthetic femoral fractures in total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 1,879 revision hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
por: VAN DOOREN, Bart, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Mortality and revision rate of cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty after hip fracture: an analysis of the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI)
por: Duijnisveld, Bouke J, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Survival and reasons for revision of the uncemented Symax hip stem: A Dutch Arthroplasty Register study
por: Kruijntjens, Dennis S. M. G., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

No clinically relevant difference in patient-reported outcomes between the direct superior approach and the posterolateral or anterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 37,976 primary hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry
por: VAN DOOREN, Bart, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparable mortality but higher revision rate after uncemented compared with cemented total hip arthroplasties in patients 80 years and older: report of 43,053 cases of the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
por: BLOEMHEUVEL, Esther M, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effects of metal-on-metal wear on the host immune system and infection in hip arthroplasty
por: Hosman, Anton H, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Dual mobility cups in primary total hip arthroplasties: trend over time in use, patient characteristics, and mid-term revision in 3,038 cases in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2007–2016)
por: Bloemheuvel, Esther M, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Effect of femoral head size and surgical approach on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of 166,231 procedures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI)
por: Zijlstra, Wierd P, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Higher risk of 2-year cup revision of ceramic-on-ceramic versus ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing: analysis of 33,454 primary press-fit total hip arthroplasties registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI)
por: van Loon, Justin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Data linkage of two national databases: Lessons learned from linking the Dutch Arthroplasty Register with the Dutch Foundation for Pharmaceutical Statistics
por: van Brug, Heather E., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Generic implant classification enables comparison across implant designs: the Dutch Arthroplasty Register implant library
por: Denissen, Geke A. W., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Short-stem hip arthroplasty in Australia and the Netherlands: a comparison of 12,680 cases between the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) and the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI)
por: VAN VEGHEL, Mirthe H W, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Patient-reported outcome of 95% of young patients improves after primary total hip arthroplasty: identification of 3 recovery trajectories in 3,207 patients younger than 55 years from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
por: KUIJPERS, Martijn F L, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Population-based 10-year cumulative revision risks after hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis to inform patients in clinical practice: a competing risk analysis from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
por: Gademan, Maaike G J, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A significant change towards cemented fixation in revision total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years in the Netherlands: results of an observational cohort study in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register in 28,516 primary hip replacements and 1285 revision procedures
por: Kuijpers, Martijn FL, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Similar risk of complete revision for infection with single-dose versus multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in primary arthroplasty of the hip and knee: results of an observational cohort study in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register in 242,179 patients
por: Veltman, Ewout S, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

No difference in 1-year improvement of patient-reported physical functioning and pain between resurfaced and unresurfaced patellae: analysis of 17,224 primary total knee arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
por: ROBBEN, Bart J, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Opioid prescribing patterns after arthroplasty of the knee and hip: a Dutch nationwide cohort study from 2013 to 2018
por: VAN BRUG, Heather E, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The risk of revision after total hip arthroplasty in young patients depends on surgical approach, femoral head size and bearing type; an analysis of 19,682 operations in the Dutch arthroplasty register
por: Kuijpers, M. F. L., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

More than 95% completeness of reported procedures in the population-based Dutch Arthroplasty Register: External validation of 311,890 procedures
por: van Steenbergen, Liza N, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Risk for re-revision and type of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in hip or knee arthroplasty revisions: report of the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
por: BOS, Pieter K, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register
por: Gundtoft, Per Hviid, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty in 30,830 patients with hip fractures: data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register on revision and risk factors for revision
por: Moerman, Sophie, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Revision risk of salvage compared with acute total hip arthroplasty following femoral neck fracture: an analysis from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
por: SCHMITZ, Peter P, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Lower 5-year cup re-revision rate for dual mobility cups compared with unipolar cups: report of 15,922 cup revision cases in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2007–2016)
por: Bloemheuvel, Esther M, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

LEAK study: design of a nationwide randomised controlled trial to find the best way to treat wound leakage after primary hip and knee arthroplasty
por: Löwik, Claudia A M, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Higher risk of revision for partial knee replacements in low absolute volume hospitals: data from 18,134 partial knee replacements in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
por: van Oost, Iris, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Higher mid-term revision rates of posterior stabilized compared with cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasties: 133,841 cemented arthroplasties for osteoarthritis in the Netherlands in 2007–2016
por: Spekenbrink-Spooren, Anneke, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Reasons for revision are associated with rerevised total knee arthroplasties: an analysis of 8,978 index revisions in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
por: Belt, Maartje, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Feasibility of Collecting Multiple Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Alongside the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
por: Tilbury, Claire, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The development of an online implant manufacturer application: a knowledge-sharing platform for the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register
por: Vinblad, Johanna, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_2jrs9ol2qt34ltit9mvkct8qh4