Cargando…
Latitude in sample handling and storage for infant faecal microbiota studies: the elephant in the room?
BACKGROUND: In this manuscript, we investigate the “stones best left unturned” of sample storage and preparation and their implications for the next-generation sequencing of infant faecal microbial communities by the 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) gene. We present a number of experiments that...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4967342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27473284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0186-x |
_version_ | 1782445504993427456 |
---|---|
author | Shaw, Alexander G. Sim, Kathleen Powell, Elizabeth Cornwell, Emma Cramer, Teresa McClure, Zoë E. Li, Ming-Shi Kroll, J. Simon |
author_facet | Shaw, Alexander G. Sim, Kathleen Powell, Elizabeth Cornwell, Emma Cramer, Teresa McClure, Zoë E. Li, Ming-Shi Kroll, J. Simon |
author_sort | Shaw, Alexander G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In this manuscript, we investigate the “stones best left unturned” of sample storage and preparation and their implications for the next-generation sequencing of infant faecal microbial communities by the 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) gene. We present a number of experiments that investigate the potential effects of often overlooked methodology factors, establishing a “normal” degree of variation expected between replica sequenced samples. Sources of excess variation are then identified, as measured by observation of alpha diversity, taxonomic group counts and beta diversity magnitudes between microbial communities. RESULTS: Extraction of DNA from samples on different dates, by different people and even using varied sample weights results in little significant difference in downstream sequencing data. A key assumption in many studies is the stability of samples stored long term at −80 °C prior to extraction. After 2 years, we see relatively few changes: increased abundances of lactobacilli and bacilli and a reduction in the overall OTU count. Where samples cannot be frozen, we find that storing samples at room temperature does lead to significant changes in the microbial community after 2 days. Mailing of samples during this time period (a common form of sample collection from outpatients for example) does not lead to any additional variation. CONCLUSIONS: Important methodological standards can be drawn from these results; painstakingly created archives of infant faecal samples stored at −80 °C are still largely representative of the original community and varying factors in DNA extraction methodology have comparatively little effect on overall results. Samples taken should ideally be either frozen at −80 °C or extracted within 2 days if stored at room temperature, with mail samples being mailed on the day of collection. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40168-016-0186-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4967342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49673422016-07-31 Latitude in sample handling and storage for infant faecal microbiota studies: the elephant in the room? Shaw, Alexander G. Sim, Kathleen Powell, Elizabeth Cornwell, Emma Cramer, Teresa McClure, Zoë E. Li, Ming-Shi Kroll, J. Simon Microbiome Research BACKGROUND: In this manuscript, we investigate the “stones best left unturned” of sample storage and preparation and their implications for the next-generation sequencing of infant faecal microbial communities by the 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) gene. We present a number of experiments that investigate the potential effects of often overlooked methodology factors, establishing a “normal” degree of variation expected between replica sequenced samples. Sources of excess variation are then identified, as measured by observation of alpha diversity, taxonomic group counts and beta diversity magnitudes between microbial communities. RESULTS: Extraction of DNA from samples on different dates, by different people and even using varied sample weights results in little significant difference in downstream sequencing data. A key assumption in many studies is the stability of samples stored long term at −80 °C prior to extraction. After 2 years, we see relatively few changes: increased abundances of lactobacilli and bacilli and a reduction in the overall OTU count. Where samples cannot be frozen, we find that storing samples at room temperature does lead to significant changes in the microbial community after 2 days. Mailing of samples during this time period (a common form of sample collection from outpatients for example) does not lead to any additional variation. CONCLUSIONS: Important methodological standards can be drawn from these results; painstakingly created archives of infant faecal samples stored at −80 °C are still largely representative of the original community and varying factors in DNA extraction methodology have comparatively little effect on overall results. Samples taken should ideally be either frozen at −80 °C or extracted within 2 days if stored at room temperature, with mail samples being mailed on the day of collection. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40168-016-0186-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4967342/ /pubmed/27473284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0186-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Shaw, Alexander G. Sim, Kathleen Powell, Elizabeth Cornwell, Emma Cramer, Teresa McClure, Zoë E. Li, Ming-Shi Kroll, J. Simon Latitude in sample handling and storage for infant faecal microbiota studies: the elephant in the room? |
title | Latitude in sample handling and storage for infant faecal microbiota studies: the elephant in the room? |
title_full | Latitude in sample handling and storage for infant faecal microbiota studies: the elephant in the room? |
title_fullStr | Latitude in sample handling and storage for infant faecal microbiota studies: the elephant in the room? |
title_full_unstemmed | Latitude in sample handling and storage for infant faecal microbiota studies: the elephant in the room? |
title_short | Latitude in sample handling and storage for infant faecal microbiota studies: the elephant in the room? |
title_sort | latitude in sample handling and storage for infant faecal microbiota studies: the elephant in the room? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4967342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27473284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0186-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shawalexanderg latitudeinsamplehandlingandstorageforinfantfaecalmicrobiotastudiestheelephantintheroom AT simkathleen latitudeinsamplehandlingandstorageforinfantfaecalmicrobiotastudiestheelephantintheroom AT powellelizabeth latitudeinsamplehandlingandstorageforinfantfaecalmicrobiotastudiestheelephantintheroom AT cornwellemma latitudeinsamplehandlingandstorageforinfantfaecalmicrobiotastudiestheelephantintheroom AT cramerteresa latitudeinsamplehandlingandstorageforinfantfaecalmicrobiotastudiestheelephantintheroom AT mcclurezoee latitudeinsamplehandlingandstorageforinfantfaecalmicrobiotastudiestheelephantintheroom AT limingshi latitudeinsamplehandlingandstorageforinfantfaecalmicrobiotastudiestheelephantintheroom AT krolljsimon latitudeinsamplehandlingandstorageforinfantfaecalmicrobiotastudiestheelephantintheroom |