Cargando…

Long-term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation for chronic migraine: a cohort of 53 patients

BACKGROUND: Chronic migraine affects up to 2 % of the general population and has a substantial impact on sufferers. Occipital nerve stimulation has been investigated as a potentially effective treatment for refractory chronic migraine. Results from randomised controlled trials and open label studies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Sarah, Watkins, Laurence, Matharu, Manjit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4967414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27475100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-016-0659-0
_version_ 1782445508850089984
author Miller, Sarah
Watkins, Laurence
Matharu, Manjit
author_facet Miller, Sarah
Watkins, Laurence
Matharu, Manjit
author_sort Miller, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic migraine affects up to 2 % of the general population and has a substantial impact on sufferers. Occipital nerve stimulation has been investigated as a potentially effective treatment for refractory chronic migraine. Results from randomised controlled trials and open label studies have been inconclusive with little long-term data available. METHODS: The long-term efficacy, functional outcome and safety of occipital nerve stimulation was evaluated in an uncontrolled, open-label, prospective study of 53 intractable chronic migraine patients. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were implanted in a single centre between 2007 and 2013. Patients had a mean age of 47.75 years (range 26–70), had suffered chronic migraine for around 12 years and had failed a mean of 9 (range 4–19) preventative treatments prior to implant. Eighteen patients had other chronic headache phenotypes in addition to chronic migraine. After a median follow-up of 42.00 months (range 6–97) monthly moderate-to-severe headache days (i.e. days on which pain was more than 4 on the verbal rating score and lasted at least 4 h) reduced by 8.51 days (p < 0.001) in the whole cohort, 5.80 days (p < 0.01) in those with chronic migraine alone and 12.16 days (p < 0.001) in those with multiple phenotypes including chronic migraine. Response rate of the whole group (defined as a >30 % reduction in monthly moderate-to-severe headache days) was observed in 45.3 % of the whole cohort, 34.3 % of those with chronic migraine alone and 66.7 % in those with multiple headache types. Mean subjective patient estimate of improvement was 31.7 %. Significant reductions were also seen in outcome measures such as pain intensity (1.34 points, p < 0.001), all monthly headache days (5.66 days, p < 0.001) and pain duration (4.54 h, p < 0.001). Responders showed substantial reductions in headache-related disability, affect scores and quality of life measures. Adverse event rates were favourable with no episodes of lead migration and only one minor infection reported. CONCLUSIONS: Occipital nerve stimulation may be a safe and efficacious treatment for highly intractable chronic migraine patients even after relatively prolonged follow up of a median of over 3 years. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s10194-016-0659-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4967414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49674142016-08-11 Long-term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation for chronic migraine: a cohort of 53 patients Miller, Sarah Watkins, Laurence Matharu, Manjit J Headache Pain Research Article BACKGROUND: Chronic migraine affects up to 2 % of the general population and has a substantial impact on sufferers. Occipital nerve stimulation has been investigated as a potentially effective treatment for refractory chronic migraine. Results from randomised controlled trials and open label studies have been inconclusive with little long-term data available. METHODS: The long-term efficacy, functional outcome and safety of occipital nerve stimulation was evaluated in an uncontrolled, open-label, prospective study of 53 intractable chronic migraine patients. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were implanted in a single centre between 2007 and 2013. Patients had a mean age of 47.75 years (range 26–70), had suffered chronic migraine for around 12 years and had failed a mean of 9 (range 4–19) preventative treatments prior to implant. Eighteen patients had other chronic headache phenotypes in addition to chronic migraine. After a median follow-up of 42.00 months (range 6–97) monthly moderate-to-severe headache days (i.e. days on which pain was more than 4 on the verbal rating score and lasted at least 4 h) reduced by 8.51 days (p < 0.001) in the whole cohort, 5.80 days (p < 0.01) in those with chronic migraine alone and 12.16 days (p < 0.001) in those with multiple phenotypes including chronic migraine. Response rate of the whole group (defined as a >30 % reduction in monthly moderate-to-severe headache days) was observed in 45.3 % of the whole cohort, 34.3 % of those with chronic migraine alone and 66.7 % in those with multiple headache types. Mean subjective patient estimate of improvement was 31.7 %. Significant reductions were also seen in outcome measures such as pain intensity (1.34 points, p < 0.001), all monthly headache days (5.66 days, p < 0.001) and pain duration (4.54 h, p < 0.001). Responders showed substantial reductions in headache-related disability, affect scores and quality of life measures. Adverse event rates were favourable with no episodes of lead migration and only one minor infection reported. CONCLUSIONS: Occipital nerve stimulation may be a safe and efficacious treatment for highly intractable chronic migraine patients even after relatively prolonged follow up of a median of over 3 years. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s10194-016-0659-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Milan 2016-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4967414/ /pubmed/27475100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-016-0659-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Miller, Sarah
Watkins, Laurence
Matharu, Manjit
Long-term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation for chronic migraine: a cohort of 53 patients
title Long-term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation for chronic migraine: a cohort of 53 patients
title_full Long-term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation for chronic migraine: a cohort of 53 patients
title_fullStr Long-term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation for chronic migraine: a cohort of 53 patients
title_full_unstemmed Long-term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation for chronic migraine: a cohort of 53 patients
title_short Long-term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation for chronic migraine: a cohort of 53 patients
title_sort long-term outcomes of occipital nerve stimulation for chronic migraine: a cohort of 53 patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4967414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27475100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-016-0659-0
work_keys_str_mv AT millersarah longtermoutcomesofoccipitalnervestimulationforchronicmigraineacohortof53patients
AT watkinslaurence longtermoutcomesofoccipitalnervestimulationforchronicmigraineacohortof53patients
AT matharumanjit longtermoutcomesofoccipitalnervestimulationforchronicmigraineacohortof53patients