Cargando…

Development of a Modified Version of the Spinal Function Sort (M-SFS): A Mixed Method Approach

Purpose To develop a modified version of the spinal function sort (M-SFS) by measuring work-related self-efficacy beliefs in patients with chronic low back pain. Methods A mixed method design consisting of three different methods (M1–3) was performed. In semi-structured interviews participants were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janssen, Svenja, Trippolini, Maurizio A., Hilfiker, Roger, Oesch, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4967421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26499967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-015-9611-4
_version_ 1782445510205898752
author Janssen, Svenja
Trippolini, Maurizio A.
Hilfiker, Roger
Oesch, Peter
author_facet Janssen, Svenja
Trippolini, Maurizio A.
Hilfiker, Roger
Oesch, Peter
author_sort Janssen, Svenja
collection PubMed
description Purpose To develop a modified version of the spinal function sort (M-SFS) by measuring work-related self-efficacy beliefs in patients with chronic low back pain. Methods A mixed method design consisting of three different methods (M1–3) was performed. In semi-structured interviews participants were asked how often they performed the activities of the 50 SFS items in 1 week, and which spinal postures and movements were associated with their back pain (M1). Quantitative analysis of previously obtained SFS data investigated internal consistency, unidimensionality, item response, and floor and ceiling effect (M2). Experts rated the SFS items based on their relevance (M3). The findings from these methods were used within a final scoring system for item reduction. Results From semi-structured interviews with 17 participants, eight new items emerged (M1). Quantitative analysis of 565 data sets (M2) revealed very high internal consistency of all items (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.98) indicating item redundancy; unidimensionality of the SFS was supported by principal component analysis; good item response was confirmed by Rasch analysis; and a floor effect of four items depicting very heavy material handling was found. Experts agreed on 8 out of the 50 SFS as relevant (M3). From the original SFS, 12 items met the predefined summary score of 9. Conclusions A modified version of the SFS with 20 items has been developed. Feasibility, reliability and validity of this modified version must be tested before it can be used in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4967421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49674212016-08-12 Development of a Modified Version of the Spinal Function Sort (M-SFS): A Mixed Method Approach Janssen, Svenja Trippolini, Maurizio A. Hilfiker, Roger Oesch, Peter J Occup Rehabil Article Purpose To develop a modified version of the spinal function sort (M-SFS) by measuring work-related self-efficacy beliefs in patients with chronic low back pain. Methods A mixed method design consisting of three different methods (M1–3) was performed. In semi-structured interviews participants were asked how often they performed the activities of the 50 SFS items in 1 week, and which spinal postures and movements were associated with their back pain (M1). Quantitative analysis of previously obtained SFS data investigated internal consistency, unidimensionality, item response, and floor and ceiling effect (M2). Experts rated the SFS items based on their relevance (M3). The findings from these methods were used within a final scoring system for item reduction. Results From semi-structured interviews with 17 participants, eight new items emerged (M1). Quantitative analysis of 565 data sets (M2) revealed very high internal consistency of all items (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.98) indicating item redundancy; unidimensionality of the SFS was supported by principal component analysis; good item response was confirmed by Rasch analysis; and a floor effect of four items depicting very heavy material handling was found. Experts agreed on 8 out of the 50 SFS as relevant (M3). From the original SFS, 12 items met the predefined summary score of 9. Conclusions A modified version of the SFS with 20 items has been developed. Feasibility, reliability and validity of this modified version must be tested before it can be used in clinical practice. Springer US 2015-10-23 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4967421/ /pubmed/26499967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-015-9611-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Janssen, Svenja
Trippolini, Maurizio A.
Hilfiker, Roger
Oesch, Peter
Development of a Modified Version of the Spinal Function Sort (M-SFS): A Mixed Method Approach
title Development of a Modified Version of the Spinal Function Sort (M-SFS): A Mixed Method Approach
title_full Development of a Modified Version of the Spinal Function Sort (M-SFS): A Mixed Method Approach
title_fullStr Development of a Modified Version of the Spinal Function Sort (M-SFS): A Mixed Method Approach
title_full_unstemmed Development of a Modified Version of the Spinal Function Sort (M-SFS): A Mixed Method Approach
title_short Development of a Modified Version of the Spinal Function Sort (M-SFS): A Mixed Method Approach
title_sort development of a modified version of the spinal function sort (m-sfs): a mixed method approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4967421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26499967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-015-9611-4
work_keys_str_mv AT janssensvenja developmentofamodifiedversionofthespinalfunctionsortmsfsamixedmethodapproach
AT trippolinimaurizioa developmentofamodifiedversionofthespinalfunctionsortmsfsamixedmethodapproach
AT hilfikerroger developmentofamodifiedversionofthespinalfunctionsortmsfsamixedmethodapproach
AT oeschpeter developmentofamodifiedversionofthespinalfunctionsortmsfsamixedmethodapproach