Cargando…
Optimal timing of salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: is ultra-early salvage radiotherapy beneficial?
BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy is controversial. In particular, the prognostic significance of salvage radiotherapy delivered before a current definition of biochemical recurrence, i.e. ultra-early salvage radiotherapy, i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4967521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27475986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0671-1 |
_version_ | 1782445531658715136 |
---|---|
author | Taguchi, Satoru Shiraishi, Kenshiro Fukuhara, Hiroshi Nakagawa, Keiichi Morikawa, Teppei Naito, Akihiro Kakutani, Shigenori Takeshima, Yuta Miyazaki, Hideyo Nakagawa, Tohru Fujimura, Tetsuya Kume, Haruki Homma, Yukio |
author_facet | Taguchi, Satoru Shiraishi, Kenshiro Fukuhara, Hiroshi Nakagawa, Keiichi Morikawa, Teppei Naito, Akihiro Kakutani, Shigenori Takeshima, Yuta Miyazaki, Hideyo Nakagawa, Tohru Fujimura, Tetsuya Kume, Haruki Homma, Yukio |
author_sort | Taguchi, Satoru |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy is controversial. In particular, the prognostic significance of salvage radiotherapy delivered before a current definition of biochemical recurrence, i.e. ultra-early salvage radiotherapy, is unclear. METHODS: We reviewed 76 patients with pT2-3N0M0 prostate cancer who underwent salvage radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy biochemical recurrence at the following three timings: ultra-early salvage radiotherapy (n = 20) delivered before meeting a current definition of biochemical recurrence (two consecutive prostate-specific antigen [PSA] values ≥0.2 ng/mL); early salvage radiotherapy (n = 40) delivered after meeting the definition but before PSA reached 0.5 ng/mL; and delayed salvage radiotherapy (n = 16) delivered after PSA reached 0.5 ng/mL. The primary endpoint was failure of salvage radiotherapy, defined as a PSA value ≥0.2 ng/mL. The log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were used for univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively. RESULTS: During the follow-up period (median: 70 months), four of 20 (20 %), nine of 40 (23 %) and seven of 16 (44 %) patients failed biochemically in the ultra-early, early and delayed salvage radiotherapy groups, respectively. On univariate analyses, the outcome of delayed salvage radiotherapy was worse than the others, while there was no significant difference between ultra-early and early groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated the presence of Gleason pattern 5, perineural invasion and delayed salvage radiotherapy as independent predictors of poorer survival. CONCLUSIONS: No survival benefit of ultra-early salvage radiotherapy was demonstrated, whereas delayed salvage radiotherapy was associated with worse outcome as reported in previous studies. Our results may support the current recommendations that salvage radiotherapy should be undertaken after two consecutive PSA values ≥0.2 ng/mL and before reaching 0.5 ng/mL. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4967521 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49675212016-08-01 Optimal timing of salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: is ultra-early salvage radiotherapy beneficial? Taguchi, Satoru Shiraishi, Kenshiro Fukuhara, Hiroshi Nakagawa, Keiichi Morikawa, Teppei Naito, Akihiro Kakutani, Shigenori Takeshima, Yuta Miyazaki, Hideyo Nakagawa, Tohru Fujimura, Tetsuya Kume, Haruki Homma, Yukio Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy is controversial. In particular, the prognostic significance of salvage radiotherapy delivered before a current definition of biochemical recurrence, i.e. ultra-early salvage radiotherapy, is unclear. METHODS: We reviewed 76 patients with pT2-3N0M0 prostate cancer who underwent salvage radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy biochemical recurrence at the following three timings: ultra-early salvage radiotherapy (n = 20) delivered before meeting a current definition of biochemical recurrence (two consecutive prostate-specific antigen [PSA] values ≥0.2 ng/mL); early salvage radiotherapy (n = 40) delivered after meeting the definition but before PSA reached 0.5 ng/mL; and delayed salvage radiotherapy (n = 16) delivered after PSA reached 0.5 ng/mL. The primary endpoint was failure of salvage radiotherapy, defined as a PSA value ≥0.2 ng/mL. The log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were used for univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively. RESULTS: During the follow-up period (median: 70 months), four of 20 (20 %), nine of 40 (23 %) and seven of 16 (44 %) patients failed biochemically in the ultra-early, early and delayed salvage radiotherapy groups, respectively. On univariate analyses, the outcome of delayed salvage radiotherapy was worse than the others, while there was no significant difference between ultra-early and early groups. Multivariate analysis demonstrated the presence of Gleason pattern 5, perineural invasion and delayed salvage radiotherapy as independent predictors of poorer survival. CONCLUSIONS: No survival benefit of ultra-early salvage radiotherapy was demonstrated, whereas delayed salvage radiotherapy was associated with worse outcome as reported in previous studies. Our results may support the current recommendations that salvage radiotherapy should be undertaken after two consecutive PSA values ≥0.2 ng/mL and before reaching 0.5 ng/mL. BioMed Central 2016-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4967521/ /pubmed/27475986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0671-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Taguchi, Satoru Shiraishi, Kenshiro Fukuhara, Hiroshi Nakagawa, Keiichi Morikawa, Teppei Naito, Akihiro Kakutani, Shigenori Takeshima, Yuta Miyazaki, Hideyo Nakagawa, Tohru Fujimura, Tetsuya Kume, Haruki Homma, Yukio Optimal timing of salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: is ultra-early salvage radiotherapy beneficial? |
title | Optimal timing of salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: is ultra-early salvage radiotherapy beneficial? |
title_full | Optimal timing of salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: is ultra-early salvage radiotherapy beneficial? |
title_fullStr | Optimal timing of salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: is ultra-early salvage radiotherapy beneficial? |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal timing of salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: is ultra-early salvage radiotherapy beneficial? |
title_short | Optimal timing of salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: is ultra-early salvage radiotherapy beneficial? |
title_sort | optimal timing of salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: is ultra-early salvage radiotherapy beneficial? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4967521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27475986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0671-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taguchisatoru optimaltimingofsalvageradiotherapyforbiochemicalrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomyisultraearlysalvageradiotherapybeneficial AT shiraishikenshiro optimaltimingofsalvageradiotherapyforbiochemicalrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomyisultraearlysalvageradiotherapybeneficial AT fukuharahiroshi optimaltimingofsalvageradiotherapyforbiochemicalrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomyisultraearlysalvageradiotherapybeneficial AT nakagawakeiichi optimaltimingofsalvageradiotherapyforbiochemicalrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomyisultraearlysalvageradiotherapybeneficial AT morikawateppei optimaltimingofsalvageradiotherapyforbiochemicalrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomyisultraearlysalvageradiotherapybeneficial AT naitoakihiro optimaltimingofsalvageradiotherapyforbiochemicalrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomyisultraearlysalvageradiotherapybeneficial AT kakutanishigenori optimaltimingofsalvageradiotherapyforbiochemicalrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomyisultraearlysalvageradiotherapybeneficial AT takeshimayuta optimaltimingofsalvageradiotherapyforbiochemicalrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomyisultraearlysalvageradiotherapybeneficial AT miyazakihideyo optimaltimingofsalvageradiotherapyforbiochemicalrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomyisultraearlysalvageradiotherapybeneficial AT nakagawatohru optimaltimingofsalvageradiotherapyforbiochemicalrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomyisultraearlysalvageradiotherapybeneficial AT fujimuratetsuya optimaltimingofsalvageradiotherapyforbiochemicalrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomyisultraearlysalvageradiotherapybeneficial AT kumeharuki optimaltimingofsalvageradiotherapyforbiochemicalrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomyisultraearlysalvageradiotherapybeneficial AT hommayukio optimaltimingofsalvageradiotherapyforbiochemicalrecurrenceafterradicalprostatectomyisultraearlysalvageradiotherapybeneficial |