Cargando…
Opening the ‘black box’: liaison psychiatry services and what they actually do
Aims and method To develop a simple, pragmatic typology to characterise the nature of liaison interventions delivered by a liaison service in a National Health Service setting. We carried out a retrospective electronic case-note review of referrals to a ward-based liaison psychiatry service. Results...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of Psychiatrists
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4967773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27512583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.051771 |
_version_ | 1782445566236557312 |
---|---|
author | Guthrie, Elspeth McMeekin, Aaron Thomasson, Rachel Khan, Sylvia Makin, Sally Shaw, Ben Longson, Damien |
author_facet | Guthrie, Elspeth McMeekin, Aaron Thomasson, Rachel Khan, Sylvia Makin, Sally Shaw, Ben Longson, Damien |
author_sort | Guthrie, Elspeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aims and method To develop a simple, pragmatic typology to characterise the nature of liaison interventions delivered by a liaison service in a National Health Service setting. We carried out a retrospective electronic case-note review of referrals to a ward-based liaison psychiatry service. Results Three hundred and forty-four patients were referred to the service over a 12-month period. Ten different types of liaison interventions were identified, with the most common interventions being diagnosis (112 patients, 32.6%), medication management (57 patients, 16.6%), risk assessment and treatment (56 patients, 16.3% each). Mental Health Act work accounted for the greatest number of contacts per patient (median 7). Clinical implications There are inherent limitations in any single-site observational study, as site-specific results cannot be generalised to other liaison services. The intervention categories we developed, however, are easy to use and will provide a way of comparing and benchmarking the range of interventions delivered by different liaison psychiatry services. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4967773 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Royal College of Psychiatrists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49677732016-08-10 Opening the ‘black box’: liaison psychiatry services and what they actually do Guthrie, Elspeth McMeekin, Aaron Thomasson, Rachel Khan, Sylvia Makin, Sally Shaw, Ben Longson, Damien BJPsych Bull Original Papers Aims and method To develop a simple, pragmatic typology to characterise the nature of liaison interventions delivered by a liaison service in a National Health Service setting. We carried out a retrospective electronic case-note review of referrals to a ward-based liaison psychiatry service. Results Three hundred and forty-four patients were referred to the service over a 12-month period. Ten different types of liaison interventions were identified, with the most common interventions being diagnosis (112 patients, 32.6%), medication management (57 patients, 16.6%), risk assessment and treatment (56 patients, 16.3% each). Mental Health Act work accounted for the greatest number of contacts per patient (median 7). Clinical implications There are inherent limitations in any single-site observational study, as site-specific results cannot be generalised to other liaison services. The intervention categories we developed, however, are easy to use and will provide a way of comparing and benchmarking the range of interventions delivered by different liaison psychiatry services. Royal College of Psychiatrists 2016-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4967773/ /pubmed/27512583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.051771 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open-access article published by the Royal College of Psychiatrists and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Papers Guthrie, Elspeth McMeekin, Aaron Thomasson, Rachel Khan, Sylvia Makin, Sally Shaw, Ben Longson, Damien Opening the ‘black box’: liaison psychiatry services and what they actually do |
title | Opening the ‘black box’: liaison psychiatry services and what they actually do |
title_full | Opening the ‘black box’: liaison psychiatry services and what they actually do |
title_fullStr | Opening the ‘black box’: liaison psychiatry services and what they actually do |
title_full_unstemmed | Opening the ‘black box’: liaison psychiatry services and what they actually do |
title_short | Opening the ‘black box’: liaison psychiatry services and what they actually do |
title_sort | opening the ‘black box’: liaison psychiatry services and what they actually do |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4967773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27512583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.115.051771 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guthrieelspeth openingtheblackboxliaisonpsychiatryservicesandwhattheyactuallydo AT mcmeekinaaron openingtheblackboxliaisonpsychiatryservicesandwhattheyactuallydo AT thomassonrachel openingtheblackboxliaisonpsychiatryservicesandwhattheyactuallydo AT khansylvia openingtheblackboxliaisonpsychiatryservicesandwhattheyactuallydo AT makinsally openingtheblackboxliaisonpsychiatryservicesandwhattheyactuallydo AT shawben openingtheblackboxliaisonpsychiatryservicesandwhattheyactuallydo AT longsondamien openingtheblackboxliaisonpsychiatryservicesandwhattheyactuallydo |