Cargando…
A Comparative Analysis of Community Detection Algorithms on Artificial Networks
Many community detection algorithms have been developed to uncover the mesoscopic properties of complex networks. However how good an algorithm is, in terms of accuracy and computing time, remains still open. Testing algorithms on real-world network has certain restrictions which made their insights...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4967864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27476470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep30750 |
_version_ | 1782445581420986368 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Zhao Algesheimer, René Tessone, Claudio J. |
author_facet | Yang, Zhao Algesheimer, René Tessone, Claudio J. |
author_sort | Yang, Zhao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many community detection algorithms have been developed to uncover the mesoscopic properties of complex networks. However how good an algorithm is, in terms of accuracy and computing time, remains still open. Testing algorithms on real-world network has certain restrictions which made their insights potentially biased: the networks are usually small, and the underlying communities are not defined objectively. In this study, we employ the Lancichinetti-Fortunato-Radicchi benchmark graph to test eight state-of-the-art algorithms. We quantify the accuracy using complementary measures and algorithms’ computing time. Based on simple network properties and the aforementioned results, we provide guidelines that help to choose the most adequate community detection algorithm for a given network. Moreover, these rules allow uncovering limitations in the use of specific algorithms given macroscopic network properties. Our contribution is threefold: firstly, we provide actual techniques to determine which is the most suited algorithm in most circumstances based on observable properties of the network under consideration. Secondly, we use the mixing parameter as an easily measurable indicator of finding the ranges of reliability of the different algorithms. Finally, we study the dependency with network size focusing on both the algorithm’s predicting power and the effective computing time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4967864 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49678642016-08-10 A Comparative Analysis of Community Detection Algorithms on Artificial Networks Yang, Zhao Algesheimer, René Tessone, Claudio J. Sci Rep Article Many community detection algorithms have been developed to uncover the mesoscopic properties of complex networks. However how good an algorithm is, in terms of accuracy and computing time, remains still open. Testing algorithms on real-world network has certain restrictions which made their insights potentially biased: the networks are usually small, and the underlying communities are not defined objectively. In this study, we employ the Lancichinetti-Fortunato-Radicchi benchmark graph to test eight state-of-the-art algorithms. We quantify the accuracy using complementary measures and algorithms’ computing time. Based on simple network properties and the aforementioned results, we provide guidelines that help to choose the most adequate community detection algorithm for a given network. Moreover, these rules allow uncovering limitations in the use of specific algorithms given macroscopic network properties. Our contribution is threefold: firstly, we provide actual techniques to determine which is the most suited algorithm in most circumstances based on observable properties of the network under consideration. Secondly, we use the mixing parameter as an easily measurable indicator of finding the ranges of reliability of the different algorithms. Finally, we study the dependency with network size focusing on both the algorithm’s predicting power and the effective computing time. Nature Publishing Group 2016-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4967864/ /pubmed/27476470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep30750 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Yang, Zhao Algesheimer, René Tessone, Claudio J. A Comparative Analysis of Community Detection Algorithms on Artificial Networks |
title | A Comparative Analysis of Community Detection Algorithms on Artificial Networks |
title_full | A Comparative Analysis of Community Detection Algorithms on Artificial Networks |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Analysis of Community Detection Algorithms on Artificial Networks |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Analysis of Community Detection Algorithms on Artificial Networks |
title_short | A Comparative Analysis of Community Detection Algorithms on Artificial Networks |
title_sort | comparative analysis of community detection algorithms on artificial networks |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4967864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27476470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep30750 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangzhao acomparativeanalysisofcommunitydetectionalgorithmsonartificialnetworks AT algesheimerrene acomparativeanalysisofcommunitydetectionalgorithmsonartificialnetworks AT tessoneclaudioj acomparativeanalysisofcommunitydetectionalgorithmsonartificialnetworks AT yangzhao comparativeanalysisofcommunitydetectionalgorithmsonartificialnetworks AT algesheimerrene comparativeanalysisofcommunitydetectionalgorithmsonartificialnetworks AT tessoneclaudioj comparativeanalysisofcommunitydetectionalgorithmsonartificialnetworks |