Cargando…

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Combination of Autograft and Allograft Tendon: A MOON Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring autografts less than 8.5 mm in diameter is associated with worse patient-reported outcome scores and increased risk of revision surgery compared with reconstructions performed with larger grafts. One proposed solution to smal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Darnley, James E., Léger-St-Jean, Benjamin, Pedroza, Angela D., Flanigan, David C., Kaeding, Christopher C., Magnussen, Robert A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
25
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27517057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116662249
_version_ 1782445608359952384
author Darnley, James E.
Léger-St-Jean, Benjamin
Pedroza, Angela D.
Flanigan, David C.
Kaeding, Christopher C.
Magnussen, Robert A.
author_facet Darnley, James E.
Léger-St-Jean, Benjamin
Pedroza, Angela D.
Flanigan, David C.
Kaeding, Christopher C.
Magnussen, Robert A.
author_sort Darnley, James E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring autografts less than 8.5 mm in diameter is associated with worse patient-reported outcome scores and increased risk of revision surgery compared with reconstructions performed with larger grafts. One proposed solution to small autograft harvest is to create a hybrid graft by augmenting autografts with allograft tissue to increase graft diameter. PURPOSE: To compare hybrid autograft/allograft ACL reconstruction to autograft ACL reconstruction, specifically analyzing the patient-reported outcome scores and the risk of revision surgery at 2 years postoperative. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: From the years 2002 to 2009, a total of 34 patients were identified from a prospectively collected database as having undergone hybrid ACL reconstruction. Twenty-seven of 34 (79.4%) patients had a 2-year follow-up. These 27 patients were matched by age (within 1 year) and sex to 27 patients who underwent hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction during the same period. At the 2-year mark, revision surgery risk and patient-reported outcome scores were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The mean age for the hybrid and matched groups (±SD) was 20.9 ± 7.0 years. Both the hybrid and control groups had 17 males and 10 females. There was no significant difference in preoperative patient-reported outcome scores, meniscus tears, or cartilage lesions between the 2 groups. Graft size was larger in the hybrid group (9.5 ± 0.6 mm) than in the autograft group (8.4 ± 0.9 mm) (P < .001). At 2 years postoperative, patient-reported outcome scores were similar between the hybrid and autograft groups. Revision surgery was required in 5 (18.5%) patients who underwent hybrid reconstruction compared with 2 (7.4%) of those who underwent autograft reconstruction (P = .26). CONCLUSION: Patients who undergo ACL reconstruction with hybrid hamstring grafts and hamstring autografts report similar patient-reported outcome scores at 2 years postoperative but may be at increased risk for revision ACL reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4968052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49680522016-08-11 Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Combination of Autograft and Allograft Tendon: A MOON Cohort Study Darnley, James E. Léger-St-Jean, Benjamin Pedroza, Angela D. Flanigan, David C. Kaeding, Christopher C. Magnussen, Robert A. Orthop J Sports Med 25 BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring autografts less than 8.5 mm in diameter is associated with worse patient-reported outcome scores and increased risk of revision surgery compared with reconstructions performed with larger grafts. One proposed solution to small autograft harvest is to create a hybrid graft by augmenting autografts with allograft tissue to increase graft diameter. PURPOSE: To compare hybrid autograft/allograft ACL reconstruction to autograft ACL reconstruction, specifically analyzing the patient-reported outcome scores and the risk of revision surgery at 2 years postoperative. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: From the years 2002 to 2009, a total of 34 patients were identified from a prospectively collected database as having undergone hybrid ACL reconstruction. Twenty-seven of 34 (79.4%) patients had a 2-year follow-up. These 27 patients were matched by age (within 1 year) and sex to 27 patients who underwent hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction during the same period. At the 2-year mark, revision surgery risk and patient-reported outcome scores were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The mean age for the hybrid and matched groups (±SD) was 20.9 ± 7.0 years. Both the hybrid and control groups had 17 males and 10 females. There was no significant difference in preoperative patient-reported outcome scores, meniscus tears, or cartilage lesions between the 2 groups. Graft size was larger in the hybrid group (9.5 ± 0.6 mm) than in the autograft group (8.4 ± 0.9 mm) (P < .001). At 2 years postoperative, patient-reported outcome scores were similar between the hybrid and autograft groups. Revision surgery was required in 5 (18.5%) patients who underwent hybrid reconstruction compared with 2 (7.4%) of those who underwent autograft reconstruction (P = .26). CONCLUSION: Patients who undergo ACL reconstruction with hybrid hamstring grafts and hamstring autografts report similar patient-reported outcome scores at 2 years postoperative but may be at increased risk for revision ACL reconstruction. SAGE Publications 2016-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4968052/ /pubmed/27517057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116662249 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle 25
Darnley, James E.
Léger-St-Jean, Benjamin
Pedroza, Angela D.
Flanigan, David C.
Kaeding, Christopher C.
Magnussen, Robert A.
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Combination of Autograft and Allograft Tendon: A MOON Cohort Study
title Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Combination of Autograft and Allograft Tendon: A MOON Cohort Study
title_full Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Combination of Autograft and Allograft Tendon: A MOON Cohort Study
title_fullStr Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Combination of Autograft and Allograft Tendon: A MOON Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Combination of Autograft and Allograft Tendon: A MOON Cohort Study
title_short Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Combination of Autograft and Allograft Tendon: A MOON Cohort Study
title_sort anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a combination of autograft and allograft tendon: a moon cohort study
topic 25
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27517057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116662249
work_keys_str_mv AT darnleyjamese anteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusingacombinationofautograftandallografttendonamooncohortstudy
AT legerstjeanbenjamin anteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusingacombinationofautograftandallografttendonamooncohortstudy
AT pedrozaangelad anteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusingacombinationofautograftandallografttendonamooncohortstudy
AT flanigandavidc anteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusingacombinationofautograftandallografttendonamooncohortstudy
AT kaedingchristopherc anteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusingacombinationofautograftandallografttendonamooncohortstudy
AT magnussenroberta anteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusingacombinationofautograftandallografttendonamooncohortstudy