Cargando…
Characterization of Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize the morphology and location of posterior glenoid bone loss in pat ients with posterior instability instability utilizing computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Clinical data was selected for patients with posterior shoulder instability that had u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968392/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116S00108 |
_version_ | 1782445655460937728 |
---|---|
author | Yanke, Adam Blair Frank, Rachel M. Shin, Jason J. Van Thiel, Geoffrey S. Verma, Nikhil N. Cole, Brian J. Romeo, Anthony A. Provencher, Matthew T. |
author_facet | Yanke, Adam Blair Frank, Rachel M. Shin, Jason J. Van Thiel, Geoffrey S. Verma, Nikhil N. Cole, Brian J. Romeo, Anthony A. Provencher, Matthew T. |
author_sort | Yanke, Adam Blair |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize the morphology and location of posterior glenoid bone loss in pat ients with posterior instability instability utilizing computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Clinical data was selected for patients with posterior shoulder instability that had undergone posterior stabilization (open or arthroscopic) or posterior osseous augmentation (distal tibia or iliac crest). Three fellowship-trained surgeons from two institutions contributed patients. Pre-operative CT data was collected for all patients. The axial cuts were segmented and reformatted in three-dimensions for glenoid analysis using Osirix. From this three-dimensional model, the following was calculated: percent bone loss (Nobuhara), total arc of the defect (degrees), and a clock-face description (start point, stop point, and average or direction). Pearson correlation coefficients were performed using significance of p<0.05. RESULTS: Fifty shoulders from 50 patients were reviewed. Fourteen patients (average age 30 years; 93% male) had evidence of posterior glenoid bone loss and were included for evaluation. Defects on average involved 13.7±8.6% of the glenoid (range, 2-35%). The average start time (assuming all right shoulders) on the clock face was 10 o’clock ± 40 minutes and stopped at 6:30 ± 25 minutes. The average direction of the defect pointed toward 8:15 ± 25 minutes. The percent bone loss correlated with the total arc of the defect (Pearson: 0.93, p<0.05, R2: 0.86) and the direction of the bone loss (Pearson: 0.64, p<0.05, R2: 0.40). The direction of bone loss significantly moved more posterosuperior the larger the defect became (Pearson: 0.63, p<0.05, R2: 0.40). CONCLUSION: Posterior bone loss associated with posterior glenohumeral instability is typically directed posteriorly at 8:15 on the clock. As defect get bigger, this direction moves more posterosuperior. This information will help guide clinicians in understanding the typical location of posterior bone loss aiding in diagnosis, cadaveric models, and treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4968392 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49683922016-08-11 Characterization of Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss Yanke, Adam Blair Frank, Rachel M. Shin, Jason J. Van Thiel, Geoffrey S. Verma, Nikhil N. Cole, Brian J. Romeo, Anthony A. Provencher, Matthew T. Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize the morphology and location of posterior glenoid bone loss in pat ients with posterior instability instability utilizing computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Clinical data was selected for patients with posterior shoulder instability that had undergone posterior stabilization (open or arthroscopic) or posterior osseous augmentation (distal tibia or iliac crest). Three fellowship-trained surgeons from two institutions contributed patients. Pre-operative CT data was collected for all patients. The axial cuts were segmented and reformatted in three-dimensions for glenoid analysis using Osirix. From this three-dimensional model, the following was calculated: percent bone loss (Nobuhara), total arc of the defect (degrees), and a clock-face description (start point, stop point, and average or direction). Pearson correlation coefficients were performed using significance of p<0.05. RESULTS: Fifty shoulders from 50 patients were reviewed. Fourteen patients (average age 30 years; 93% male) had evidence of posterior glenoid bone loss and were included for evaluation. Defects on average involved 13.7±8.6% of the glenoid (range, 2-35%). The average start time (assuming all right shoulders) on the clock face was 10 o’clock ± 40 minutes and stopped at 6:30 ± 25 minutes. The average direction of the defect pointed toward 8:15 ± 25 minutes. The percent bone loss correlated with the total arc of the defect (Pearson: 0.93, p<0.05, R2: 0.86) and the direction of the bone loss (Pearson: 0.64, p<0.05, R2: 0.40). The direction of bone loss significantly moved more posterosuperior the larger the defect became (Pearson: 0.63, p<0.05, R2: 0.40). CONCLUSION: Posterior bone loss associated with posterior glenohumeral instability is typically directed posteriorly at 8:15 on the clock. As defect get bigger, this direction moves more posterosuperior. This information will help guide clinicians in understanding the typical location of posterior bone loss aiding in diagnosis, cadaveric models, and treatment. SAGE Publications 2016-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4968392/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116S00108 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav. |
spellingShingle | Article Yanke, Adam Blair Frank, Rachel M. Shin, Jason J. Van Thiel, Geoffrey S. Verma, Nikhil N. Cole, Brian J. Romeo, Anthony A. Provencher, Matthew T. Characterization of Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss |
title | Characterization of Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss |
title_full | Characterization of Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss |
title_fullStr | Characterization of Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss |
title_full_unstemmed | Characterization of Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss |
title_short | Characterization of Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss |
title_sort | characterization of posterior glenoid bone loss |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968392/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116S00108 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yankeadamblair characterizationofposteriorglenoidboneloss AT frankrachelm characterizationofposteriorglenoidboneloss AT shinjasonj characterizationofposteriorglenoidboneloss AT vanthielgeoffreys characterizationofposteriorglenoidboneloss AT vermanikhiln characterizationofposteriorglenoidboneloss AT colebrianj characterizationofposteriorglenoidboneloss AT romeoanthonya characterizationofposteriorglenoidboneloss AT provenchermatthewt characterizationofposteriorglenoidboneloss |