Cargando…

Characterization of Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize the morphology and location of posterior glenoid bone loss in pat ients with posterior instability instability utilizing computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Clinical data was selected for patients with posterior shoulder instability that had u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yanke, Adam Blair, Frank, Rachel M., Shin, Jason J., Van Thiel, Geoffrey S., Verma, Nikhil N., Cole, Brian J., Romeo, Anthony A., Provencher, Matthew T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968392/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116S00108
_version_ 1782445655460937728
author Yanke, Adam Blair
Frank, Rachel M.
Shin, Jason J.
Van Thiel, Geoffrey S.
Verma, Nikhil N.
Cole, Brian J.
Romeo, Anthony A.
Provencher, Matthew T.
author_facet Yanke, Adam Blair
Frank, Rachel M.
Shin, Jason J.
Van Thiel, Geoffrey S.
Verma, Nikhil N.
Cole, Brian J.
Romeo, Anthony A.
Provencher, Matthew T.
author_sort Yanke, Adam Blair
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize the morphology and location of posterior glenoid bone loss in pat ients with posterior instability instability utilizing computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Clinical data was selected for patients with posterior shoulder instability that had undergone posterior stabilization (open or arthroscopic) or posterior osseous augmentation (distal tibia or iliac crest). Three fellowship-trained surgeons from two institutions contributed patients. Pre-operative CT data was collected for all patients. The axial cuts were segmented and reformatted in three-dimensions for glenoid analysis using Osirix. From this three-dimensional model, the following was calculated: percent bone loss (Nobuhara), total arc of the defect (degrees), and a clock-face description (start point, stop point, and average or direction). Pearson correlation coefficients were performed using significance of p<0.05. RESULTS: Fifty shoulders from 50 patients were reviewed. Fourteen patients (average age 30 years; 93% male) had evidence of posterior glenoid bone loss and were included for evaluation. Defects on average involved 13.7±8.6% of the glenoid (range, 2-35%). The average start time (assuming all right shoulders) on the clock face was 10 o’clock ± 40 minutes and stopped at 6:30 ± 25 minutes. The average direction of the defect pointed toward 8:15 ± 25 minutes. The percent bone loss correlated with the total arc of the defect (Pearson: 0.93, p<0.05, R2: 0.86) and the direction of the bone loss (Pearson: 0.64, p<0.05, R2: 0.40). The direction of bone loss significantly moved more posterosuperior the larger the defect became (Pearson: 0.63, p<0.05, R2: 0.40). CONCLUSION: Posterior bone loss associated with posterior glenohumeral instability is typically directed posteriorly at 8:15 on the clock. As defect get bigger, this direction moves more posterosuperior. This information will help guide clinicians in understanding the typical location of posterior bone loss aiding in diagnosis, cadaveric models, and treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4968392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49683922016-08-11 Characterization of Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss Yanke, Adam Blair Frank, Rachel M. Shin, Jason J. Van Thiel, Geoffrey S. Verma, Nikhil N. Cole, Brian J. Romeo, Anthony A. Provencher, Matthew T. Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize the morphology and location of posterior glenoid bone loss in pat ients with posterior instability instability utilizing computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Clinical data was selected for patients with posterior shoulder instability that had undergone posterior stabilization (open or arthroscopic) or posterior osseous augmentation (distal tibia or iliac crest). Three fellowship-trained surgeons from two institutions contributed patients. Pre-operative CT data was collected for all patients. The axial cuts were segmented and reformatted in three-dimensions for glenoid analysis using Osirix. From this three-dimensional model, the following was calculated: percent bone loss (Nobuhara), total arc of the defect (degrees), and a clock-face description (start point, stop point, and average or direction). Pearson correlation coefficients were performed using significance of p<0.05. RESULTS: Fifty shoulders from 50 patients were reviewed. Fourteen patients (average age 30 years; 93% male) had evidence of posterior glenoid bone loss and were included for evaluation. Defects on average involved 13.7±8.6% of the glenoid (range, 2-35%). The average start time (assuming all right shoulders) on the clock face was 10 o’clock ± 40 minutes and stopped at 6:30 ± 25 minutes. The average direction of the defect pointed toward 8:15 ± 25 minutes. The percent bone loss correlated with the total arc of the defect (Pearson: 0.93, p<0.05, R2: 0.86) and the direction of the bone loss (Pearson: 0.64, p<0.05, R2: 0.40). The direction of bone loss significantly moved more posterosuperior the larger the defect became (Pearson: 0.63, p<0.05, R2: 0.40). CONCLUSION: Posterior bone loss associated with posterior glenohumeral instability is typically directed posteriorly at 8:15 on the clock. As defect get bigger, this direction moves more posterosuperior. This information will help guide clinicians in understanding the typical location of posterior bone loss aiding in diagnosis, cadaveric models, and treatment. SAGE Publications 2016-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4968392/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116S00108 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
spellingShingle Article
Yanke, Adam Blair
Frank, Rachel M.
Shin, Jason J.
Van Thiel, Geoffrey S.
Verma, Nikhil N.
Cole, Brian J.
Romeo, Anthony A.
Provencher, Matthew T.
Characterization of Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss
title Characterization of Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss
title_full Characterization of Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss
title_fullStr Characterization of Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss
title_full_unstemmed Characterization of Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss
title_short Characterization of Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss
title_sort characterization of posterior glenoid bone loss
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968392/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116S00108
work_keys_str_mv AT yankeadamblair characterizationofposteriorglenoidboneloss
AT frankrachelm characterizationofposteriorglenoidboneloss
AT shinjasonj characterizationofposteriorglenoidboneloss
AT vanthielgeoffreys characterizationofposteriorglenoidboneloss
AT vermanikhiln characterizationofposteriorglenoidboneloss
AT colebrianj characterizationofposteriorglenoidboneloss
AT romeoanthonya characterizationofposteriorglenoidboneloss
AT provenchermatthewt characterizationofposteriorglenoidboneloss