Cargando…

Knee Hyperextension as a Predictor of Failure in Revision ACL Reconstruction: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES: We studied the minimum 2 year follow-up outcomes in an ACL revision cohort. The hypothesis is that knees that hyperextend will have a worse outcome and greater odds of graft failure than knees that do not hyperextend. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in outcomes or graf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cooper, Daniel E., Dunn, Warren R., Wright, Rick W., Haas, Amanda, Huston, Laura J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968407/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116S00187
_version_ 1782445656601788416
author Cooper, Daniel E.
Dunn, Warren R.
Wright, Rick W.
Haas, Amanda
Huston, Laura J.
author_facet Cooper, Daniel E.
Dunn, Warren R.
Wright, Rick W.
Haas, Amanda
Huston, Laura J.
author_sort Cooper, Daniel E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We studied the minimum 2 year follow-up outcomes in an ACL revision cohort. The hypothesis is that knees that hyperextend will have a worse outcome and greater odds of graft failure than knees that do not hyperextend. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in outcomes or graft rupture between the two groups. METHODS: Revision ACL reconstruction patients were identified and prospectively enrolled between 2006 and 2011. Data collected included baseline demographics, surgical technique and pathology, and a series of validated patient reported outcome instruments (IKDC, KOOS, WOMAC, and Marx activity rating score). Patients were followed up for 2 years, and asked to complete the identical set of outcome instruments. A regression model using graft failure as the dependent variable included graft type, age, and hyperextension greater than or equal to 5 degrees yes/no (HE) in order to assess these potential surgical risk factors for clinical outcomes 2 years after revision ACL reconstruction. RESULTS: There were 1,145 subjects included in the analyses. The median age of the cohort was 26 (IQR= 20, 35), and 58% were male. The proportion that were enrolled for their first revision surgery was 88%, their second 10%, and third or greater 2%. The number of subjects categorized as HE was 375 (33%). The median age of subjects that failed was 18, compared to 26 for those with intact grafts. All three variables included in our regression model were significant predictors of graft failure: younger age, inter-quartile range odds ratio (IQROR) = 3.32 (95%CI 1.5, 7.2) p= 0.002; use of allograft OR = 3.1 (95%CI 1.4, 6.9) p= 0.01, and HE 2.1 (95%CI 1.02, 4.42) p= 0.04. CONCLUSION: The MARS Study Group has previously reported that young age and the use of allograft as a graft source are independent predictors (over 3X odds ratio) of graft rupture after revision ACLR. This study found that knee hyperextension greater than or equal to 5 degrees is present in 1/3 of patients who undergo revision ACLR. HE is also an independent predictor of graft failure after revision ACLR. This is the first study to investigate and confirm knee physiologic hyperextension as a risk factor (over 2X odds ratio) of graft rupture in ACL surgery. Future reports on ACL reconstruction results should separately evaluate the group of knees that hyperextend 5 degrees or more as compared to those that do not.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4968407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49684072016-08-11 Knee Hyperextension as a Predictor of Failure in Revision ACL Reconstruction: A Prospective Cohort Study Cooper, Daniel E. Dunn, Warren R. Wright, Rick W. Haas, Amanda Huston, Laura J. Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: We studied the minimum 2 year follow-up outcomes in an ACL revision cohort. The hypothesis is that knees that hyperextend will have a worse outcome and greater odds of graft failure than knees that do not hyperextend. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in outcomes or graft rupture between the two groups. METHODS: Revision ACL reconstruction patients were identified and prospectively enrolled between 2006 and 2011. Data collected included baseline demographics, surgical technique and pathology, and a series of validated patient reported outcome instruments (IKDC, KOOS, WOMAC, and Marx activity rating score). Patients were followed up for 2 years, and asked to complete the identical set of outcome instruments. A regression model using graft failure as the dependent variable included graft type, age, and hyperextension greater than or equal to 5 degrees yes/no (HE) in order to assess these potential surgical risk factors for clinical outcomes 2 years after revision ACL reconstruction. RESULTS: There were 1,145 subjects included in the analyses. The median age of the cohort was 26 (IQR= 20, 35), and 58% were male. The proportion that were enrolled for their first revision surgery was 88%, their second 10%, and third or greater 2%. The number of subjects categorized as HE was 375 (33%). The median age of subjects that failed was 18, compared to 26 for those with intact grafts. All three variables included in our regression model were significant predictors of graft failure: younger age, inter-quartile range odds ratio (IQROR) = 3.32 (95%CI 1.5, 7.2) p= 0.002; use of allograft OR = 3.1 (95%CI 1.4, 6.9) p= 0.01, and HE 2.1 (95%CI 1.02, 4.42) p= 0.04. CONCLUSION: The MARS Study Group has previously reported that young age and the use of allograft as a graft source are independent predictors (over 3X odds ratio) of graft rupture after revision ACLR. This study found that knee hyperextension greater than or equal to 5 degrees is present in 1/3 of patients who undergo revision ACLR. HE is also an independent predictor of graft failure after revision ACLR. This is the first study to investigate and confirm knee physiologic hyperextension as a risk factor (over 2X odds ratio) of graft rupture in ACL surgery. Future reports on ACL reconstruction results should separately evaluate the group of knees that hyperextend 5 degrees or more as compared to those that do not. SAGE Publications 2016-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4968407/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116S00187 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
spellingShingle Article
Cooper, Daniel E.
Dunn, Warren R.
Wright, Rick W.
Haas, Amanda
Huston, Laura J.
Knee Hyperextension as a Predictor of Failure in Revision ACL Reconstruction: A Prospective Cohort Study
title Knee Hyperextension as a Predictor of Failure in Revision ACL Reconstruction: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_full Knee Hyperextension as a Predictor of Failure in Revision ACL Reconstruction: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Knee Hyperextension as a Predictor of Failure in Revision ACL Reconstruction: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Knee Hyperextension as a Predictor of Failure in Revision ACL Reconstruction: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_short Knee Hyperextension as a Predictor of Failure in Revision ACL Reconstruction: A Prospective Cohort Study
title_sort knee hyperextension as a predictor of failure in revision acl reconstruction: a prospective cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968407/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967116S00187
work_keys_str_mv AT cooperdaniele kneehyperextensionasapredictoroffailureinrevisionaclreconstructionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT dunnwarrenr kneehyperextensionasapredictoroffailureinrevisionaclreconstructionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT wrightrickw kneehyperextensionasapredictoroffailureinrevisionaclreconstructionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT haasamanda kneehyperextensionasapredictoroffailureinrevisionaclreconstructionaprospectivecohortstudy
AT hustonlauraj kneehyperextensionasapredictoroffailureinrevisionaclreconstructionaprospectivecohortstudy