Cargando…

The effect of X‐ray beam distortion on the Edwards Sapien XT (™) trans‐catheter aortic valve replacement prosthesis

INTRODUCTION: Profiling the Aortic root perpendicular to the fluoroscopic image plane will achieve a more successful implant position for trans‐catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study aimed to investigate whether the divergent nature of the X‐ray beam from the C‐arm altered the appearan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crowhurst, James A., Poon, Karl K., Murdoch, Dale, Incani, Alexander, Raffel, Owen C., Liddicoat, Annelise, Walters, Darren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27512569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.131
_version_ 1782445681698406400
author Crowhurst, James A.
Poon, Karl K.
Murdoch, Dale
Incani, Alexander
Raffel, Owen C.
Liddicoat, Annelise
Walters, Darren
author_facet Crowhurst, James A.
Poon, Karl K.
Murdoch, Dale
Incani, Alexander
Raffel, Owen C.
Liddicoat, Annelise
Walters, Darren
author_sort Crowhurst, James A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Profiling the Aortic root perpendicular to the fluoroscopic image plane will achieve a more successful implant position for trans‐catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study aimed to investigate whether the divergent nature of the X‐ray beam from the C‐arm altered the appearance of the TAVR device. METHODS: Under bench‐top testing, a 23, 26 and 29 mm Edwards Sapien XT valve was positioned coaxially at the bottom of a fluoroscopic image utilising 22 and 32 cm fields of view (FOV). The table was then moved so that the valve was positioned at the top of the image. The valve's appearance was scored using a previously published three tier classification tool (excellent, satisfactory and poor) and quantified with measurements. The number of degrees of C‐arm rotation that were required to bring the valve back to a coaxial appearance was recorded. RESULTS: When using the 32 cm FOV, the valve's appearance changes from excellent to satisfactory. When a 22 cm FOV was used, the change is less marked. More C‐arm rotation is required to bring the appearance back to coaxial with the 32 cm FOV. CONCLUSION: Not maintaining the valve in the centre of the image can distort the valves appearance. This has the potential to affect the final implantation depth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4968560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49685602016-08-10 The effect of X‐ray beam distortion on the Edwards Sapien XT (™) trans‐catheter aortic valve replacement prosthesis Crowhurst, James A. Poon, Karl K. Murdoch, Dale Incani, Alexander Raffel, Owen C. Liddicoat, Annelise Walters, Darren J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Profiling the Aortic root perpendicular to the fluoroscopic image plane will achieve a more successful implant position for trans‐catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study aimed to investigate whether the divergent nature of the X‐ray beam from the C‐arm altered the appearance of the TAVR device. METHODS: Under bench‐top testing, a 23, 26 and 29 mm Edwards Sapien XT valve was positioned coaxially at the bottom of a fluoroscopic image utilising 22 and 32 cm fields of view (FOV). The table was then moved so that the valve was positioned at the top of the image. The valve's appearance was scored using a previously published three tier classification tool (excellent, satisfactory and poor) and quantified with measurements. The number of degrees of C‐arm rotation that were required to bring the valve back to a coaxial appearance was recorded. RESULTS: When using the 32 cm FOV, the valve's appearance changes from excellent to satisfactory. When a 22 cm FOV was used, the change is less marked. More C‐arm rotation is required to bring the appearance back to coaxial with the 32 cm FOV. CONCLUSION: Not maintaining the valve in the centre of the image can distort the valves appearance. This has the potential to affect the final implantation depth. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-08-30 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4968560/ /pubmed/27512569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.131 Text en © 2015 The Prince Charles Hospital. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd on behalf of Australian Institute of Radiography and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Crowhurst, James A.
Poon, Karl K.
Murdoch, Dale
Incani, Alexander
Raffel, Owen C.
Liddicoat, Annelise
Walters, Darren
The effect of X‐ray beam distortion on the Edwards Sapien XT (™) trans‐catheter aortic valve replacement prosthesis
title The effect of X‐ray beam distortion on the Edwards Sapien XT (™) trans‐catheter aortic valve replacement prosthesis
title_full The effect of X‐ray beam distortion on the Edwards Sapien XT (™) trans‐catheter aortic valve replacement prosthesis
title_fullStr The effect of X‐ray beam distortion on the Edwards Sapien XT (™) trans‐catheter aortic valve replacement prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed The effect of X‐ray beam distortion on the Edwards Sapien XT (™) trans‐catheter aortic valve replacement prosthesis
title_short The effect of X‐ray beam distortion on the Edwards Sapien XT (™) trans‐catheter aortic valve replacement prosthesis
title_sort effect of x‐ray beam distortion on the edwards sapien xt (™) trans‐catheter aortic valve replacement prosthesis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27512569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.131
work_keys_str_mv AT crowhurstjamesa theeffectofxraybeamdistortionontheedwardssapienxttranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementprosthesis
AT poonkarlk theeffectofxraybeamdistortionontheedwardssapienxttranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementprosthesis
AT murdochdale theeffectofxraybeamdistortionontheedwardssapienxttranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementprosthesis
AT incanialexander theeffectofxraybeamdistortionontheedwardssapienxttranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementprosthesis
AT raffelowenc theeffectofxraybeamdistortionontheedwardssapienxttranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementprosthesis
AT liddicoatannelise theeffectofxraybeamdistortionontheedwardssapienxttranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementprosthesis
AT waltersdarren theeffectofxraybeamdistortionontheedwardssapienxttranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementprosthesis
AT crowhurstjamesa effectofxraybeamdistortionontheedwardssapienxttranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementprosthesis
AT poonkarlk effectofxraybeamdistortionontheedwardssapienxttranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementprosthesis
AT murdochdale effectofxraybeamdistortionontheedwardssapienxttranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementprosthesis
AT incanialexander effectofxraybeamdistortionontheedwardssapienxttranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementprosthesis
AT raffelowenc effectofxraybeamdistortionontheedwardssapienxttranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementprosthesis
AT liddicoatannelise effectofxraybeamdistortionontheedwardssapienxttranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementprosthesis
AT waltersdarren effectofxraybeamdistortionontheedwardssapienxttranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementprosthesis