Cargando…

Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratios during Labor: A Prospective Observational Study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of urine protein/creatinine ratio (uPCR) measurements among healthy parturients at term we performed a prospective cohort study at a community teaching hospital. METHODS: Serial urine samples were collected. Ninety-three women contributed 284 urine samples. uPCRs wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanamai, Vaya W., Seagle, Brandon-Luke L., Yeh, Judy Y., Brady, Bethany, Miller, Corrie B., Sena, Salvador, Dodge, Jessica, Shahabi, Shohreh, Samuelson, Robert, Norwitz, Errol R., Luo, Guoyang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27479123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160453
_version_ 1782445711021834240
author Tanamai, Vaya W.
Seagle, Brandon-Luke L.
Yeh, Judy Y.
Brady, Bethany
Miller, Corrie B.
Sena, Salvador
Dodge, Jessica
Shahabi, Shohreh
Samuelson, Robert
Norwitz, Errol R.
Luo, Guoyang
author_facet Tanamai, Vaya W.
Seagle, Brandon-Luke L.
Yeh, Judy Y.
Brady, Bethany
Miller, Corrie B.
Sena, Salvador
Dodge, Jessica
Shahabi, Shohreh
Samuelson, Robert
Norwitz, Errol R.
Luo, Guoyang
author_sort Tanamai, Vaya W.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of urine protein/creatinine ratio (uPCR) measurements among healthy parturients at term we performed a prospective cohort study at a community teaching hospital. METHODS: Serial urine samples were collected. Ninety-three women contributed 284 urine samples. uPCRs were determined. Multiple imputation and paired sampled analysis was performed when appropriate. RESULTS: Two-thirds (63/93) of women had at least one measured uPCR ≥ 0.3. One-third (31/93) had a uPCR ≥ 0.3 at admission, including 39.1% (9/23) of women not in labor. Median (IQR) uPCRs increased during labor and after delivery: latent phase/no labor, 0.15 (0.06–0.32); active phase, 0.29 (0.10–0.58); early postpartum, 0.45 (0.18–1.36) (all p < 0.04). Median uPCRs were significantly < 0.3 in the latent phase and significantly > 0.3 in the immediate postpartum period (p < 0.01). Women who labored before cesarean delivery had the highest early postpartum uPCRs: median (IQR) 1.16 (0.39–1.80). A negative urine dipstick protein result did not exclude uPCR ≥ 0.3. uPCRs were similar when compared by method of urine collection. CONCLUSION: uPCR ≥ 0.3 is common among healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancies at term. uPCR increases during labor and is not a reliable measure of pathologic proteinuria at term or during the peripartum period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4968820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49688202016-08-18 Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratios during Labor: A Prospective Observational Study Tanamai, Vaya W. Seagle, Brandon-Luke L. Yeh, Judy Y. Brady, Bethany Miller, Corrie B. Sena, Salvador Dodge, Jessica Shahabi, Shohreh Samuelson, Robert Norwitz, Errol R. Luo, Guoyang PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of urine protein/creatinine ratio (uPCR) measurements among healthy parturients at term we performed a prospective cohort study at a community teaching hospital. METHODS: Serial urine samples were collected. Ninety-three women contributed 284 urine samples. uPCRs were determined. Multiple imputation and paired sampled analysis was performed when appropriate. RESULTS: Two-thirds (63/93) of women had at least one measured uPCR ≥ 0.3. One-third (31/93) had a uPCR ≥ 0.3 at admission, including 39.1% (9/23) of women not in labor. Median (IQR) uPCRs increased during labor and after delivery: latent phase/no labor, 0.15 (0.06–0.32); active phase, 0.29 (0.10–0.58); early postpartum, 0.45 (0.18–1.36) (all p < 0.04). Median uPCRs were significantly < 0.3 in the latent phase and significantly > 0.3 in the immediate postpartum period (p < 0.01). Women who labored before cesarean delivery had the highest early postpartum uPCRs: median (IQR) 1.16 (0.39–1.80). A negative urine dipstick protein result did not exclude uPCR ≥ 0.3. uPCRs were similar when compared by method of urine collection. CONCLUSION: uPCR ≥ 0.3 is common among healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancies at term. uPCR increases during labor and is not a reliable measure of pathologic proteinuria at term or during the peripartum period. Public Library of Science 2016-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4968820/ /pubmed/27479123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160453 Text en © 2016 Tanamai et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tanamai, Vaya W.
Seagle, Brandon-Luke L.
Yeh, Judy Y.
Brady, Bethany
Miller, Corrie B.
Sena, Salvador
Dodge, Jessica
Shahabi, Shohreh
Samuelson, Robert
Norwitz, Errol R.
Luo, Guoyang
Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratios during Labor: A Prospective Observational Study
title Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratios during Labor: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratios during Labor: A Prospective Observational Study
title_fullStr Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratios during Labor: A Prospective Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratios during Labor: A Prospective Observational Study
title_short Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratios during Labor: A Prospective Observational Study
title_sort urine protein/creatinine ratios during labor: a prospective observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27479123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160453
work_keys_str_mv AT tanamaivayaw urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT seaglebrandonlukel urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT yehjudyy urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT bradybethany urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT millercorrieb urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT senasalvador urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT dodgejessica urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT shahabishohreh urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT samuelsonrobert urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT norwitzerrolr urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT luoguoyang urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy