Cargando…
Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratios during Labor: A Prospective Observational Study
PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of urine protein/creatinine ratio (uPCR) measurements among healthy parturients at term we performed a prospective cohort study at a community teaching hospital. METHODS: Serial urine samples were collected. Ninety-three women contributed 284 urine samples. uPCRs wer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27479123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160453 |
_version_ | 1782445711021834240 |
---|---|
author | Tanamai, Vaya W. Seagle, Brandon-Luke L. Yeh, Judy Y. Brady, Bethany Miller, Corrie B. Sena, Salvador Dodge, Jessica Shahabi, Shohreh Samuelson, Robert Norwitz, Errol R. Luo, Guoyang |
author_facet | Tanamai, Vaya W. Seagle, Brandon-Luke L. Yeh, Judy Y. Brady, Bethany Miller, Corrie B. Sena, Salvador Dodge, Jessica Shahabi, Shohreh Samuelson, Robert Norwitz, Errol R. Luo, Guoyang |
author_sort | Tanamai, Vaya W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of urine protein/creatinine ratio (uPCR) measurements among healthy parturients at term we performed a prospective cohort study at a community teaching hospital. METHODS: Serial urine samples were collected. Ninety-three women contributed 284 urine samples. uPCRs were determined. Multiple imputation and paired sampled analysis was performed when appropriate. RESULTS: Two-thirds (63/93) of women had at least one measured uPCR ≥ 0.3. One-third (31/93) had a uPCR ≥ 0.3 at admission, including 39.1% (9/23) of women not in labor. Median (IQR) uPCRs increased during labor and after delivery: latent phase/no labor, 0.15 (0.06–0.32); active phase, 0.29 (0.10–0.58); early postpartum, 0.45 (0.18–1.36) (all p < 0.04). Median uPCRs were significantly < 0.3 in the latent phase and significantly > 0.3 in the immediate postpartum period (p < 0.01). Women who labored before cesarean delivery had the highest early postpartum uPCRs: median (IQR) 1.16 (0.39–1.80). A negative urine dipstick protein result did not exclude uPCR ≥ 0.3. uPCRs were similar when compared by method of urine collection. CONCLUSION: uPCR ≥ 0.3 is common among healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancies at term. uPCR increases during labor and is not a reliable measure of pathologic proteinuria at term or during the peripartum period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4968820 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49688202016-08-18 Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratios during Labor: A Prospective Observational Study Tanamai, Vaya W. Seagle, Brandon-Luke L. Yeh, Judy Y. Brady, Bethany Miller, Corrie B. Sena, Salvador Dodge, Jessica Shahabi, Shohreh Samuelson, Robert Norwitz, Errol R. Luo, Guoyang PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of urine protein/creatinine ratio (uPCR) measurements among healthy parturients at term we performed a prospective cohort study at a community teaching hospital. METHODS: Serial urine samples were collected. Ninety-three women contributed 284 urine samples. uPCRs were determined. Multiple imputation and paired sampled analysis was performed when appropriate. RESULTS: Two-thirds (63/93) of women had at least one measured uPCR ≥ 0.3. One-third (31/93) had a uPCR ≥ 0.3 at admission, including 39.1% (9/23) of women not in labor. Median (IQR) uPCRs increased during labor and after delivery: latent phase/no labor, 0.15 (0.06–0.32); active phase, 0.29 (0.10–0.58); early postpartum, 0.45 (0.18–1.36) (all p < 0.04). Median uPCRs were significantly < 0.3 in the latent phase and significantly > 0.3 in the immediate postpartum period (p < 0.01). Women who labored before cesarean delivery had the highest early postpartum uPCRs: median (IQR) 1.16 (0.39–1.80). A negative urine dipstick protein result did not exclude uPCR ≥ 0.3. uPCRs were similar when compared by method of urine collection. CONCLUSION: uPCR ≥ 0.3 is common among healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancies at term. uPCR increases during labor and is not a reliable measure of pathologic proteinuria at term or during the peripartum period. Public Library of Science 2016-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4968820/ /pubmed/27479123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160453 Text en © 2016 Tanamai et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tanamai, Vaya W. Seagle, Brandon-Luke L. Yeh, Judy Y. Brady, Bethany Miller, Corrie B. Sena, Salvador Dodge, Jessica Shahabi, Shohreh Samuelson, Robert Norwitz, Errol R. Luo, Guoyang Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratios during Labor: A Prospective Observational Study |
title | Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratios during Labor: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_full | Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratios during Labor: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_fullStr | Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratios during Labor: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratios during Labor: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_short | Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratios during Labor: A Prospective Observational Study |
title_sort | urine protein/creatinine ratios during labor: a prospective observational study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27479123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160453 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanamaivayaw urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy AT seaglebrandonlukel urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy AT yehjudyy urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy AT bradybethany urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy AT millercorrieb urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy AT senasalvador urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy AT dodgejessica urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy AT shahabishohreh urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy AT samuelsonrobert urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy AT norwitzerrolr urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy AT luoguoyang urineproteincreatinineratiosduringlaboraprospectiveobservationalstudy |