Cargando…

Work intensity in sacroiliac joint fusion and lumbar microdiscectomy

BACKGROUND: The evidence base supporting minimally invasive sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion (SIJF) surgery is increasing. The work relative value units (RVUs) associated with minimally invasive SIJF are seemingly low. To date, only one published study describes the relative work intensity associated wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frank, Clay, Kondrashov, Dimitriy, Meyer, S Craig, Dix, Gary, Lorio, Morgan, Kovalsky, Don, Cher, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27555790
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S112006
_version_ 1782445729595260928
author Frank, Clay
Kondrashov, Dimitriy
Meyer, S Craig
Dix, Gary
Lorio, Morgan
Kovalsky, Don
Cher, Daniel
author_facet Frank, Clay
Kondrashov, Dimitriy
Meyer, S Craig
Dix, Gary
Lorio, Morgan
Kovalsky, Don
Cher, Daniel
author_sort Frank, Clay
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The evidence base supporting minimally invasive sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion (SIJF) surgery is increasing. The work relative value units (RVUs) associated with minimally invasive SIJF are seemingly low. To date, only one published study describes the relative work intensity associated with minimally invasive SIJF. No study has compared work intensity vs other commonly performed spine surgery procedures. METHODS: Charts of 192 patients at five sites who underwent either minimally invasive SIJF (American Medical Association [AMA] CPT® code 27279) or lumbar microdiscectomy (AMA CPT® code 63030) were reviewed. Abstracted were preoperative times associated with diagnosis and patient care, intraoperative parameters including operating room (OR) in/out times and procedure start/stop times, and postoperative care requirements. Additionally, using a visual analog scale, surgeons estimated the intensity of intraoperative care, including mental, temporal, and physical demands and effort and frustration. Work was defined as operative time multiplied by task intensity. RESULTS: Patients who underwent minimally invasive SIJF were more likely female. Mean procedure times were lower in SIJF by about 27.8 minutes (P<0.0001) and mean total OR times were lower by 27.9 minutes (P<0.0001), but there was substantial overlap across procedures. Mean preservice and post-service total labor times were longer in minimally invasive SIJF (preservice times longer by 63.5 minutes [P<0.0001] and post-service labor times longer by 20.2 minutes [P<0.0001]). The number of postoperative visits was higher in minimally invasive SIJF. Mean total service time (preoperative + OR time + postoperative) was higher in the minimally invasive SIJF group (261.5 vs 211.9 minutes, P<0.0001). Intraoperative intensity levels were higher for mental, physical, effort, and frustration domains (P<0.0001 each). After taking into account intensity, intraoperative workloads showed substantial overlap. CONCLUSION: Compared to a commonly performed lumbar spine surgical procedure, lumbar microdiscectomy, that currently has a higher work RVU, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative workload for minimally invasive SIJF is higher. The work RVU for minimally invasive SIJF should be adjusted upward as the relative amount of work is comparable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4968979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49689792016-08-23 Work intensity in sacroiliac joint fusion and lumbar microdiscectomy Frank, Clay Kondrashov, Dimitriy Meyer, S Craig Dix, Gary Lorio, Morgan Kovalsky, Don Cher, Daniel Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The evidence base supporting minimally invasive sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion (SIJF) surgery is increasing. The work relative value units (RVUs) associated with minimally invasive SIJF are seemingly low. To date, only one published study describes the relative work intensity associated with minimally invasive SIJF. No study has compared work intensity vs other commonly performed spine surgery procedures. METHODS: Charts of 192 patients at five sites who underwent either minimally invasive SIJF (American Medical Association [AMA] CPT® code 27279) or lumbar microdiscectomy (AMA CPT® code 63030) were reviewed. Abstracted were preoperative times associated with diagnosis and patient care, intraoperative parameters including operating room (OR) in/out times and procedure start/stop times, and postoperative care requirements. Additionally, using a visual analog scale, surgeons estimated the intensity of intraoperative care, including mental, temporal, and physical demands and effort and frustration. Work was defined as operative time multiplied by task intensity. RESULTS: Patients who underwent minimally invasive SIJF were more likely female. Mean procedure times were lower in SIJF by about 27.8 minutes (P<0.0001) and mean total OR times were lower by 27.9 minutes (P<0.0001), but there was substantial overlap across procedures. Mean preservice and post-service total labor times were longer in minimally invasive SIJF (preservice times longer by 63.5 minutes [P<0.0001] and post-service labor times longer by 20.2 minutes [P<0.0001]). The number of postoperative visits was higher in minimally invasive SIJF. Mean total service time (preoperative + OR time + postoperative) was higher in the minimally invasive SIJF group (261.5 vs 211.9 minutes, P<0.0001). Intraoperative intensity levels were higher for mental, physical, effort, and frustration domains (P<0.0001 each). After taking into account intensity, intraoperative workloads showed substantial overlap. CONCLUSION: Compared to a commonly performed lumbar spine surgical procedure, lumbar microdiscectomy, that currently has a higher work RVU, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative workload for minimally invasive SIJF is higher. The work RVU for minimally invasive SIJF should be adjusted upward as the relative amount of work is comparable. Dove Medical Press 2016-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4968979/ /pubmed/27555790 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S112006 Text en © 2016 Frank et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Frank, Clay
Kondrashov, Dimitriy
Meyer, S Craig
Dix, Gary
Lorio, Morgan
Kovalsky, Don
Cher, Daniel
Work intensity in sacroiliac joint fusion and lumbar microdiscectomy
title Work intensity in sacroiliac joint fusion and lumbar microdiscectomy
title_full Work intensity in sacroiliac joint fusion and lumbar microdiscectomy
title_fullStr Work intensity in sacroiliac joint fusion and lumbar microdiscectomy
title_full_unstemmed Work intensity in sacroiliac joint fusion and lumbar microdiscectomy
title_short Work intensity in sacroiliac joint fusion and lumbar microdiscectomy
title_sort work intensity in sacroiliac joint fusion and lumbar microdiscectomy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27555790
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S112006
work_keys_str_mv AT frankclay workintensityinsacroiliacjointfusionandlumbarmicrodiscectomy
AT kondrashovdimitriy workintensityinsacroiliacjointfusionandlumbarmicrodiscectomy
AT meyerscraig workintensityinsacroiliacjointfusionandlumbarmicrodiscectomy
AT dixgary workintensityinsacroiliacjointfusionandlumbarmicrodiscectomy
AT loriomorgan workintensityinsacroiliacjointfusionandlumbarmicrodiscectomy
AT kovalskydon workintensityinsacroiliacjointfusionandlumbarmicrodiscectomy
AT cherdaniel workintensityinsacroiliacjointfusionandlumbarmicrodiscectomy