Cargando…

Modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families: a discrete choice conjoint experiment

BACKGROUND: Patients and their families play an important role in efforts to improve health service safety. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to understand the safety partnership preferences of patients and their families. METHOD: We used a discrete choice conjoint experiment to model the sa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cunningham, Charles E, Hutchings, Tracy, Henderson, Jennifer, Rimas, Heather, Chen, Yvonne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27555752
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S105605
_version_ 1782445730281029632
author Cunningham, Charles E
Hutchings, Tracy
Henderson, Jennifer
Rimas, Heather
Chen, Yvonne
author_facet Cunningham, Charles E
Hutchings, Tracy
Henderson, Jennifer
Rimas, Heather
Chen, Yvonne
author_sort Cunningham, Charles E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients and their families play an important role in efforts to improve health service safety. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to understand the safety partnership preferences of patients and their families. METHOD: We used a discrete choice conjoint experiment to model the safety partnership preferences of 1,084 patients or those such as parents acting on their behalf. Participants made choices between hypothetical safety partnerships composed by experimentally varying 15 four-level partnership design attributes. RESULTS: Participants preferred an approach to safety based on partnerships between patients and staff rather than a model delegating responsibility for safety to hospital staff. They valued the opportunity to participate in point of service safety partnerships, such as identity and medication double checks, that might afford an immediate risk reduction. Latent class analysis yielded two segments. Actively engaged participants (73.3%) comprised outpatients with higher education, who anticipated more benefits to safety partnerships, were more confident in their ability to contribute, and were more intent on participating. They were more likely to prefer a personal engagement strategy, valued scientific evidence, preferred a more active approach to safety education, and advocated disclosure of errors. The passively engaged segment (26.7%) anticipated fewer benefits, were less confident in their ability to contribute, and were less intent on participating. They were more likely to prefer an engagement strategy based on signage. They preferred that staff explain why they thought patients should help make care safer and decide whether errors were disclosed. Inpatients, those with immigrant backgrounds, and those with less education were more likely to be in this segment. CONCLUSION: Health services need to communicate information regarding risks, ask about partnership preferences, create opportunities respecting individual differences, and ensure a positive response when patients raise safety concerns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4968982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49689822016-08-23 Modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families: a discrete choice conjoint experiment Cunningham, Charles E Hutchings, Tracy Henderson, Jennifer Rimas, Heather Chen, Yvonne Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: Patients and their families play an important role in efforts to improve health service safety. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to understand the safety partnership preferences of patients and their families. METHOD: We used a discrete choice conjoint experiment to model the safety partnership preferences of 1,084 patients or those such as parents acting on their behalf. Participants made choices between hypothetical safety partnerships composed by experimentally varying 15 four-level partnership design attributes. RESULTS: Participants preferred an approach to safety based on partnerships between patients and staff rather than a model delegating responsibility for safety to hospital staff. They valued the opportunity to participate in point of service safety partnerships, such as identity and medication double checks, that might afford an immediate risk reduction. Latent class analysis yielded two segments. Actively engaged participants (73.3%) comprised outpatients with higher education, who anticipated more benefits to safety partnerships, were more confident in their ability to contribute, and were more intent on participating. They were more likely to prefer a personal engagement strategy, valued scientific evidence, preferred a more active approach to safety education, and advocated disclosure of errors. The passively engaged segment (26.7%) anticipated fewer benefits, were less confident in their ability to contribute, and were less intent on participating. They were more likely to prefer an engagement strategy based on signage. They preferred that staff explain why they thought patients should help make care safer and decide whether errors were disclosed. Inpatients, those with immigrant backgrounds, and those with less education were more likely to be in this segment. CONCLUSION: Health services need to communicate information regarding risks, ask about partnership preferences, create opportunities respecting individual differences, and ensure a positive response when patients raise safety concerns. Dove Medical Press 2016-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4968982/ /pubmed/27555752 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S105605 Text en © 2016 Cunningham et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cunningham, Charles E
Hutchings, Tracy
Henderson, Jennifer
Rimas, Heather
Chen, Yvonne
Modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families: a discrete choice conjoint experiment
title Modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families: a discrete choice conjoint experiment
title_full Modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families: a discrete choice conjoint experiment
title_fullStr Modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families: a discrete choice conjoint experiment
title_full_unstemmed Modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families: a discrete choice conjoint experiment
title_short Modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families: a discrete choice conjoint experiment
title_sort modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families: a discrete choice conjoint experiment
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27555752
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S105605
work_keys_str_mv AT cunninghamcharlese modelingthehospitalsafetypartnershippreferencesofpatientsandtheirfamiliesadiscretechoiceconjointexperiment
AT hutchingstracy modelingthehospitalsafetypartnershippreferencesofpatientsandtheirfamiliesadiscretechoiceconjointexperiment
AT hendersonjennifer modelingthehospitalsafetypartnershippreferencesofpatientsandtheirfamiliesadiscretechoiceconjointexperiment
AT rimasheather modelingthehospitalsafetypartnershippreferencesofpatientsandtheirfamiliesadiscretechoiceconjointexperiment
AT chenyvonne modelingthehospitalsafetypartnershippreferencesofpatientsandtheirfamiliesadiscretechoiceconjointexperiment