Cargando…
Advantages, limitations, and diagnostic accuracy of photoscreeners in early detection of amblyopia: a review
Amblyopia detection is important to ensure proper visual development and avoid permanent decrease of visual acuity. This condition does not produce symptoms, so it is difficult to diagnose if a vision problem actually exists. However, because amblyopia treatment is limited by age, early diagnosis is...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4969043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27555744 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S93714 |
_version_ | 1782445736012546048 |
---|---|
author | Sanchez, Irene Ortiz-Toquero, Sara Martin, Raul de Juan, Victoria |
author_facet | Sanchez, Irene Ortiz-Toquero, Sara Martin, Raul de Juan, Victoria |
author_sort | Sanchez, Irene |
collection | PubMed |
description | Amblyopia detection is important to ensure proper visual development and avoid permanent decrease of visual acuity. This condition does not produce symptoms, so it is difficult to diagnose if a vision problem actually exists. However, because amblyopia treatment is limited by age, early diagnosis is of paramount relevance. Traditional vision screening (conducted in <3 years) is related with difficulty in getting cooperation from a subject to conduct the eye exam, so accurate objective methods to improve amblyopia detection are necessary. Handheld devices used for photoscreening or autorefraction could offer advantages to improve amblyopia screening because they reduce exploration time to just few seconds, no subject collaboration is needed, and they provide objective information. The purpose of this review is to summarize the main functions and clinical applicability of commercially available devices for early detection of amblyopia and to describe their differences, advantages, and limitations. Although the studies reviewed are heterogeneous (due to wide differences in referral criteria, use of different risk factors, different types of samples studied, etc), these devices provide objective measures in a quick and objective way with a simple outcome report: retest, pass, or refer. However, due to major limitations, these devices are not recommended, and their use in clinical practice is limited. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4969043 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49690432016-08-23 Advantages, limitations, and diagnostic accuracy of photoscreeners in early detection of amblyopia: a review Sanchez, Irene Ortiz-Toquero, Sara Martin, Raul de Juan, Victoria Clin Ophthalmol Review Amblyopia detection is important to ensure proper visual development and avoid permanent decrease of visual acuity. This condition does not produce symptoms, so it is difficult to diagnose if a vision problem actually exists. However, because amblyopia treatment is limited by age, early diagnosis is of paramount relevance. Traditional vision screening (conducted in <3 years) is related with difficulty in getting cooperation from a subject to conduct the eye exam, so accurate objective methods to improve amblyopia detection are necessary. Handheld devices used for photoscreening or autorefraction could offer advantages to improve amblyopia screening because they reduce exploration time to just few seconds, no subject collaboration is needed, and they provide objective information. The purpose of this review is to summarize the main functions and clinical applicability of commercially available devices for early detection of amblyopia and to describe their differences, advantages, and limitations. Although the studies reviewed are heterogeneous (due to wide differences in referral criteria, use of different risk factors, different types of samples studied, etc), these devices provide objective measures in a quick and objective way with a simple outcome report: retest, pass, or refer. However, due to major limitations, these devices are not recommended, and their use in clinical practice is limited. Dove Medical Press 2016-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4969043/ /pubmed/27555744 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S93714 Text en © 2016 Sanchez et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Sanchez, Irene Ortiz-Toquero, Sara Martin, Raul de Juan, Victoria Advantages, limitations, and diagnostic accuracy of photoscreeners in early detection of amblyopia: a review |
title | Advantages, limitations, and diagnostic accuracy of photoscreeners in early detection of amblyopia: a review |
title_full | Advantages, limitations, and diagnostic accuracy of photoscreeners in early detection of amblyopia: a review |
title_fullStr | Advantages, limitations, and diagnostic accuracy of photoscreeners in early detection of amblyopia: a review |
title_full_unstemmed | Advantages, limitations, and diagnostic accuracy of photoscreeners in early detection of amblyopia: a review |
title_short | Advantages, limitations, and diagnostic accuracy of photoscreeners in early detection of amblyopia: a review |
title_sort | advantages, limitations, and diagnostic accuracy of photoscreeners in early detection of amblyopia: a review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4969043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27555744 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S93714 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanchezirene advantageslimitationsanddiagnosticaccuracyofphotoscreenersinearlydetectionofamblyopiaareview AT ortiztoquerosara advantageslimitationsanddiagnosticaccuracyofphotoscreenersinearlydetectionofamblyopiaareview AT martinraul advantageslimitationsanddiagnosticaccuracyofphotoscreenersinearlydetectionofamblyopiaareview AT dejuanvictoria advantageslimitationsanddiagnosticaccuracyofphotoscreenersinearlydetectionofamblyopiaareview |