Cargando…

Slow-Frequency Pulsed Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Modulation of Cortical Plasticity Based on Reciprocity Targeting with Precision Electrical Head Modeling

In pain management as well as other clinical applications of neuromodulation, it is important to consider the timing parameters influencing activity-dependent plasticity, including pulsed versus sustained currents, as well as the spatial action of electrical currents as they polarize the complex con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luu, Phan, Essaki Arumugam, Easwara Moorthy, Anderson, Erik, Gunn, Amanda, Rech, Dennis, Turovets, Sergei, Tucker, Don M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4969286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27531976
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00377
_version_ 1782445755026374656
author Luu, Phan
Essaki Arumugam, Easwara Moorthy
Anderson, Erik
Gunn, Amanda
Rech, Dennis
Turovets, Sergei
Tucker, Don M.
author_facet Luu, Phan
Essaki Arumugam, Easwara Moorthy
Anderson, Erik
Gunn, Amanda
Rech, Dennis
Turovets, Sergei
Tucker, Don M.
author_sort Luu, Phan
collection PubMed
description In pain management as well as other clinical applications of neuromodulation, it is important to consider the timing parameters influencing activity-dependent plasticity, including pulsed versus sustained currents, as well as the spatial action of electrical currents as they polarize the complex convolutions of the cortical mantle. These factors are of course related; studying temporal factors is not possible when the spatial resolution of current delivery to the cortex is so uncertain to make it unclear whether excitability is increased or decreased with anodal vs. cathodal current flow. In the present study we attempted to improve the targeting of specific cortical locations by applying current through flexible source-sink configurations of 256 electrodes in a geodesic array. We constructed a precision electric head model for 12 healthy individuals. Extraction of the individual’s cortical surface allowed computation of the component of the induced current that is normal to the target cortical surface. In an effort to replicate the long-term depression (LTD) induced with pulsed protocols in invasive animal research and transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, we applied 100 ms pulses at 1.9 s intervals either in cortical-surface-anodal or cortical-surface-cathodal directions, with a placebo (sham) control. The results showed significant LTD of the motor evoked potential as a result of the cortical-surface-cathodal pulses in contrast to the placebo control, with a smaller but similar LTD effect for anodal pulses. The cathodal LTD after-effect was sustained over 90 min following current injection. These results support the feasibility of pulsed protocols with low total charge in non-invasive neuromodulation when the precision of targeting is improved with a dense electrode array and accurate head modeling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4969286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49692862016-08-16 Slow-Frequency Pulsed Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Modulation of Cortical Plasticity Based on Reciprocity Targeting with Precision Electrical Head Modeling Luu, Phan Essaki Arumugam, Easwara Moorthy Anderson, Erik Gunn, Amanda Rech, Dennis Turovets, Sergei Tucker, Don M. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience In pain management as well as other clinical applications of neuromodulation, it is important to consider the timing parameters influencing activity-dependent plasticity, including pulsed versus sustained currents, as well as the spatial action of electrical currents as they polarize the complex convolutions of the cortical mantle. These factors are of course related; studying temporal factors is not possible when the spatial resolution of current delivery to the cortex is so uncertain to make it unclear whether excitability is increased or decreased with anodal vs. cathodal current flow. In the present study we attempted to improve the targeting of specific cortical locations by applying current through flexible source-sink configurations of 256 electrodes in a geodesic array. We constructed a precision electric head model for 12 healthy individuals. Extraction of the individual’s cortical surface allowed computation of the component of the induced current that is normal to the target cortical surface. In an effort to replicate the long-term depression (LTD) induced with pulsed protocols in invasive animal research and transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, we applied 100 ms pulses at 1.9 s intervals either in cortical-surface-anodal or cortical-surface-cathodal directions, with a placebo (sham) control. The results showed significant LTD of the motor evoked potential as a result of the cortical-surface-cathodal pulses in contrast to the placebo control, with a smaller but similar LTD effect for anodal pulses. The cathodal LTD after-effect was sustained over 90 min following current injection. These results support the feasibility of pulsed protocols with low total charge in non-invasive neuromodulation when the precision of targeting is improved with a dense electrode array and accurate head modeling. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4969286/ /pubmed/27531976 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00377 Text en Copyright © 2016 Luu, Essaki Arumugam, Anderson, Gunn, Rech, Turovets and Tucker. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Luu, Phan
Essaki Arumugam, Easwara Moorthy
Anderson, Erik
Gunn, Amanda
Rech, Dennis
Turovets, Sergei
Tucker, Don M.
Slow-Frequency Pulsed Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Modulation of Cortical Plasticity Based on Reciprocity Targeting with Precision Electrical Head Modeling
title Slow-Frequency Pulsed Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Modulation of Cortical Plasticity Based on Reciprocity Targeting with Precision Electrical Head Modeling
title_full Slow-Frequency Pulsed Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Modulation of Cortical Plasticity Based on Reciprocity Targeting with Precision Electrical Head Modeling
title_fullStr Slow-Frequency Pulsed Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Modulation of Cortical Plasticity Based on Reciprocity Targeting with Precision Electrical Head Modeling
title_full_unstemmed Slow-Frequency Pulsed Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Modulation of Cortical Plasticity Based on Reciprocity Targeting with Precision Electrical Head Modeling
title_short Slow-Frequency Pulsed Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Modulation of Cortical Plasticity Based on Reciprocity Targeting with Precision Electrical Head Modeling
title_sort slow-frequency pulsed transcranial electrical stimulation for modulation of cortical plasticity based on reciprocity targeting with precision electrical head modeling
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4969286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27531976
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00377
work_keys_str_mv AT luuphan slowfrequencypulsedtranscranialelectricalstimulationformodulationofcorticalplasticitybasedonreciprocitytargetingwithprecisionelectricalheadmodeling
AT essakiarumugameaswaramoorthy slowfrequencypulsedtranscranialelectricalstimulationformodulationofcorticalplasticitybasedonreciprocitytargetingwithprecisionelectricalheadmodeling
AT andersonerik slowfrequencypulsedtranscranialelectricalstimulationformodulationofcorticalplasticitybasedonreciprocitytargetingwithprecisionelectricalheadmodeling
AT gunnamanda slowfrequencypulsedtranscranialelectricalstimulationformodulationofcorticalplasticitybasedonreciprocitytargetingwithprecisionelectricalheadmodeling
AT rechdennis slowfrequencypulsedtranscranialelectricalstimulationformodulationofcorticalplasticitybasedonreciprocitytargetingwithprecisionelectricalheadmodeling
AT turovetssergei slowfrequencypulsedtranscranialelectricalstimulationformodulationofcorticalplasticitybasedonreciprocitytargetingwithprecisionelectricalheadmodeling
AT tuckerdonm slowfrequencypulsedtranscranialelectricalstimulationformodulationofcorticalplasticitybasedonreciprocitytargetingwithprecisionelectricalheadmodeling