Cargando…

Healthcare Costs and Resource Utilization in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Relapses Treated with H.P. Acthar Gel(®)

INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disorder with large annual costs. This study evaluated utilization and costs for the management of MS relapses with H.P. Acthar(®) Gel (repository corticotropin injection; Acthar; Mallinckrodt) compared to receipt of plasmapheresis (PMP) or intr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gold, Laura S., Suh, Kangho, Schepman, Patricia B., Damal, Kavitha, Hansen, Ryan N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4969319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27312977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0363-0
_version_ 1782445762664202240
author Gold, Laura S.
Suh, Kangho
Schepman, Patricia B.
Damal, Kavitha
Hansen, Ryan N.
author_facet Gold, Laura S.
Suh, Kangho
Schepman, Patricia B.
Damal, Kavitha
Hansen, Ryan N.
author_sort Gold, Laura S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disorder with large annual costs. This study evaluated utilization and costs for the management of MS relapses with H.P. Acthar(®) Gel (repository corticotropin injection; Acthar; Mallinckrodt) compared to receipt of plasmapheresis (PMP) or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) among patients with MS who experienced multiple relapses. METHODS: We identified patients with MS diagnoses who had relapses treated with intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), the first-line treatment for MS relapse. Patients who were treated for the subsequent relapses were eligible for the study. We analyzed 12- and 24-month healthcare utilization and costs among patients who received Acthar prescriptions compared to patients who were treated with PMP/IVIG using generalized linear and logistic regression models to calculate unadjusted and adjusted means and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: For the 12-month analysis, a total of 213 patients received Acthar prescriptions and 226 were treated with PMP or IVIG. Patients who received Acthar prescriptions were similar to those who received other treatments in terms of most demographic variables. Acthar recipients had fewer hospitalizations (0.2 vs. 0.4; P = 0.01) and received fewer outpatient services (29 vs. 43; P < 0.0001) but received more prescription medications (36 vs. 30; P < 0.0001) compared to recipients of PMP/IVIG. Patients who received Acthar prescriptions had lower inpatient and outpatient costs ($15,000 lower; P = 0.001; and $54,000 lower; P < 0.0001, respectively) but similar total costs. Similar results were seen in the cohort with 24 months of outcome data. CONCLUSION: Acthar may be a useful treatment option compared to PMP/IVIG for patients with MS experiencing multiple relapses. FUNDING: This study was funded by a grant to the University of Washington from Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-016-0363-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4969319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49693192016-08-25 Healthcare Costs and Resource Utilization in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Relapses Treated with H.P. Acthar Gel(®) Gold, Laura S. Suh, Kangho Schepman, Patricia B. Damal, Kavitha Hansen, Ryan N. Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disorder with large annual costs. This study evaluated utilization and costs for the management of MS relapses with H.P. Acthar(®) Gel (repository corticotropin injection; Acthar; Mallinckrodt) compared to receipt of plasmapheresis (PMP) or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) among patients with MS who experienced multiple relapses. METHODS: We identified patients with MS diagnoses who had relapses treated with intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), the first-line treatment for MS relapse. Patients who were treated for the subsequent relapses were eligible for the study. We analyzed 12- and 24-month healthcare utilization and costs among patients who received Acthar prescriptions compared to patients who were treated with PMP/IVIG using generalized linear and logistic regression models to calculate unadjusted and adjusted means and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: For the 12-month analysis, a total of 213 patients received Acthar prescriptions and 226 were treated with PMP or IVIG. Patients who received Acthar prescriptions were similar to those who received other treatments in terms of most demographic variables. Acthar recipients had fewer hospitalizations (0.2 vs. 0.4; P = 0.01) and received fewer outpatient services (29 vs. 43; P < 0.0001) but received more prescription medications (36 vs. 30; P < 0.0001) compared to recipients of PMP/IVIG. Patients who received Acthar prescriptions had lower inpatient and outpatient costs ($15,000 lower; P = 0.001; and $54,000 lower; P < 0.0001, respectively) but similar total costs. Similar results were seen in the cohort with 24 months of outcome data. CONCLUSION: Acthar may be a useful treatment option compared to PMP/IVIG for patients with MS experiencing multiple relapses. FUNDING: This study was funded by a grant to the University of Washington from Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-016-0363-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2016-06-17 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4969319/ /pubmed/27312977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0363-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gold, Laura S.
Suh, Kangho
Schepman, Patricia B.
Damal, Kavitha
Hansen, Ryan N.
Healthcare Costs and Resource Utilization in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Relapses Treated with H.P. Acthar Gel(®)
title Healthcare Costs and Resource Utilization in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Relapses Treated with H.P. Acthar Gel(®)
title_full Healthcare Costs and Resource Utilization in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Relapses Treated with H.P. Acthar Gel(®)
title_fullStr Healthcare Costs and Resource Utilization in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Relapses Treated with H.P. Acthar Gel(®)
title_full_unstemmed Healthcare Costs and Resource Utilization in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Relapses Treated with H.P. Acthar Gel(®)
title_short Healthcare Costs and Resource Utilization in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Relapses Treated with H.P. Acthar Gel(®)
title_sort healthcare costs and resource utilization in patients with multiple sclerosis relapses treated with h.p. acthar gel(®)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4969319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27312977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0363-0
work_keys_str_mv AT goldlauras healthcarecostsandresourceutilizationinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisrelapsestreatedwithhpacthargel
AT suhkangho healthcarecostsandresourceutilizationinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisrelapsestreatedwithhpacthargel
AT schepmanpatriciab healthcarecostsandresourceutilizationinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisrelapsestreatedwithhpacthargel
AT damalkavitha healthcarecostsandresourceutilizationinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisrelapsestreatedwithhpacthargel
AT hansenryann healthcarecostsandresourceutilizationinpatientswithmultiplesclerosisrelapsestreatedwithhpacthargel