Cargando…

Monitoring metabolic response using FDG PET-CT during targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of targeted drugs has had a significant impact on the approach to assessing tumour response. These drugs often induce a rapid cytostatic effect associated with a less pronounced and slower tumoural volume reduction, thereby impairing the correlation between the absence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woff, Erwin, Hendlisz, Alain, Garcia, Camilo, Deleporte, Amelie, Delaunoit, Thierry, Maréchal, Raphaël, Holbrechts, Stéphane, Van den Eynde, Marc, Demolin, Gauthier, Vierasu, Irina, Lhommel, Renaud, Gauthier, Namur, Guiot, Thomas, Ameye, Lieveke, Flamen, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4969337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27072811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3365-x
_version_ 1782445766935052288
author Woff, Erwin
Hendlisz, Alain
Garcia, Camilo
Deleporte, Amelie
Delaunoit, Thierry
Maréchal, Raphaël
Holbrechts, Stéphane
Van den Eynde, Marc
Demolin, Gauthier
Vierasu, Irina
Lhommel, Renaud
Gauthier, Namur
Guiot, Thomas
Ameye, Lieveke
Flamen, Patrick
author_facet Woff, Erwin
Hendlisz, Alain
Garcia, Camilo
Deleporte, Amelie
Delaunoit, Thierry
Maréchal, Raphaël
Holbrechts, Stéphane
Van den Eynde, Marc
Demolin, Gauthier
Vierasu, Irina
Lhommel, Renaud
Gauthier, Namur
Guiot, Thomas
Ameye, Lieveke
Flamen, Patrick
author_sort Woff, Erwin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The introduction of targeted drugs has had a significant impact on the approach to assessing tumour response. These drugs often induce a rapid cytostatic effect associated with a less pronounced and slower tumoural volume reduction, thereby impairing the correlation between the absence of tumour shrinkage and the patient’s unlikelihood of benefit. The aim of the study was to assess the predictive value of early metabolic response (mR) evaluation after one cycle, and its interlesional heterogeneity to a later metabolic and morphological response assessment performed after three cycles in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with combined sorafenib and capecitabine. METHODS: This substudy was performed within the framework of a wider prospective multicenter study on the predictive value of early FDG PET-CT response assessment (SoMore study). A lesion-based response analysis was performed, including all measurable lesions identified on the baseline PET. On a per-patient basis, a descriptive 4-class response categorization was applied based upon the presence and proportion of non-responding lesions. For dichotomic response comparison, all patients with at least one resistant lesion were classified as non-responding. RESULTS: On baseline FDG PET-CT, 124 measurable “target” lesions were identified in 38 patients. Early mR assessments showed 18 patients (47 %) without treatment resistant lesions and 12 patients (32 %) with interlesional response heterogeneity. The NPV and PPV of early mR were 85 % (35/41) and 84 % (70/83), respectively, on a per-lesion basis and 95 % (19/20) and 72 % (13/18), respectively, on a dichotomized per-patient basis. CONCLUSIONS: Early mR assessment performed after one cycle of sorafenib-capecitabine in mCRC is highly predictive of non-response at a standard response assessment time. The high NPV (95 %) of early mR could be useful as the basis for early treatment discontinuation or adaptation to spare patients from exposure to non-effective drugs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4969337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49693372016-08-17 Monitoring metabolic response using FDG PET-CT during targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer Woff, Erwin Hendlisz, Alain Garcia, Camilo Deleporte, Amelie Delaunoit, Thierry Maréchal, Raphaël Holbrechts, Stéphane Van den Eynde, Marc Demolin, Gauthier Vierasu, Irina Lhommel, Renaud Gauthier, Namur Guiot, Thomas Ameye, Lieveke Flamen, Patrick Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article INTRODUCTION: The introduction of targeted drugs has had a significant impact on the approach to assessing tumour response. These drugs often induce a rapid cytostatic effect associated with a less pronounced and slower tumoural volume reduction, thereby impairing the correlation between the absence of tumour shrinkage and the patient’s unlikelihood of benefit. The aim of the study was to assess the predictive value of early metabolic response (mR) evaluation after one cycle, and its interlesional heterogeneity to a later metabolic and morphological response assessment performed after three cycles in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with combined sorafenib and capecitabine. METHODS: This substudy was performed within the framework of a wider prospective multicenter study on the predictive value of early FDG PET-CT response assessment (SoMore study). A lesion-based response analysis was performed, including all measurable lesions identified on the baseline PET. On a per-patient basis, a descriptive 4-class response categorization was applied based upon the presence and proportion of non-responding lesions. For dichotomic response comparison, all patients with at least one resistant lesion were classified as non-responding. RESULTS: On baseline FDG PET-CT, 124 measurable “target” lesions were identified in 38 patients. Early mR assessments showed 18 patients (47 %) without treatment resistant lesions and 12 patients (32 %) with interlesional response heterogeneity. The NPV and PPV of early mR were 85 % (35/41) and 84 % (70/83), respectively, on a per-lesion basis and 95 % (19/20) and 72 % (13/18), respectively, on a dichotomized per-patient basis. CONCLUSIONS: Early mR assessment performed after one cycle of sorafenib-capecitabine in mCRC is highly predictive of non-response at a standard response assessment time. The high NPV (95 %) of early mR could be useful as the basis for early treatment discontinuation or adaptation to spare patients from exposure to non-effective drugs. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-04-12 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4969337/ /pubmed/27072811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3365-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Woff, Erwin
Hendlisz, Alain
Garcia, Camilo
Deleporte, Amelie
Delaunoit, Thierry
Maréchal, Raphaël
Holbrechts, Stéphane
Van den Eynde, Marc
Demolin, Gauthier
Vierasu, Irina
Lhommel, Renaud
Gauthier, Namur
Guiot, Thomas
Ameye, Lieveke
Flamen, Patrick
Monitoring metabolic response using FDG PET-CT during targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
title Monitoring metabolic response using FDG PET-CT during targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
title_full Monitoring metabolic response using FDG PET-CT during targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Monitoring metabolic response using FDG PET-CT during targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring metabolic response using FDG PET-CT during targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
title_short Monitoring metabolic response using FDG PET-CT during targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
title_sort monitoring metabolic response using fdg pet-ct during targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4969337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27072811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3365-x
work_keys_str_mv AT wofferwin monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT hendliszalain monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT garciacamilo monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT deleporteamelie monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT delaunoitthierry monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT marechalraphael monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT holbrechtsstephane monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT vandeneyndemarc monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT demolingauthier monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT vierasuirina monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT lhommelrenaud monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT gauthiernamur monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT guiotthomas monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT ameyelieveke monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer
AT flamenpatrick monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer