Cargando…
Monitoring metabolic response using FDG PET-CT during targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
INTRODUCTION: The introduction of targeted drugs has had a significant impact on the approach to assessing tumour response. These drugs often induce a rapid cytostatic effect associated with a less pronounced and slower tumoural volume reduction, thereby impairing the correlation between the absence...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4969337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27072811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3365-x |
_version_ | 1782445766935052288 |
---|---|
author | Woff, Erwin Hendlisz, Alain Garcia, Camilo Deleporte, Amelie Delaunoit, Thierry Maréchal, Raphaël Holbrechts, Stéphane Van den Eynde, Marc Demolin, Gauthier Vierasu, Irina Lhommel, Renaud Gauthier, Namur Guiot, Thomas Ameye, Lieveke Flamen, Patrick |
author_facet | Woff, Erwin Hendlisz, Alain Garcia, Camilo Deleporte, Amelie Delaunoit, Thierry Maréchal, Raphaël Holbrechts, Stéphane Van den Eynde, Marc Demolin, Gauthier Vierasu, Irina Lhommel, Renaud Gauthier, Namur Guiot, Thomas Ameye, Lieveke Flamen, Patrick |
author_sort | Woff, Erwin |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The introduction of targeted drugs has had a significant impact on the approach to assessing tumour response. These drugs often induce a rapid cytostatic effect associated with a less pronounced and slower tumoural volume reduction, thereby impairing the correlation between the absence of tumour shrinkage and the patient’s unlikelihood of benefit. The aim of the study was to assess the predictive value of early metabolic response (mR) evaluation after one cycle, and its interlesional heterogeneity to a later metabolic and morphological response assessment performed after three cycles in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with combined sorafenib and capecitabine. METHODS: This substudy was performed within the framework of a wider prospective multicenter study on the predictive value of early FDG PET-CT response assessment (SoMore study). A lesion-based response analysis was performed, including all measurable lesions identified on the baseline PET. On a per-patient basis, a descriptive 4-class response categorization was applied based upon the presence and proportion of non-responding lesions. For dichotomic response comparison, all patients with at least one resistant lesion were classified as non-responding. RESULTS: On baseline FDG PET-CT, 124 measurable “target” lesions were identified in 38 patients. Early mR assessments showed 18 patients (47 %) without treatment resistant lesions and 12 patients (32 %) with interlesional response heterogeneity. The NPV and PPV of early mR were 85 % (35/41) and 84 % (70/83), respectively, on a per-lesion basis and 95 % (19/20) and 72 % (13/18), respectively, on a dichotomized per-patient basis. CONCLUSIONS: Early mR assessment performed after one cycle of sorafenib-capecitabine in mCRC is highly predictive of non-response at a standard response assessment time. The high NPV (95 %) of early mR could be useful as the basis for early treatment discontinuation or adaptation to spare patients from exposure to non-effective drugs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4969337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49693372016-08-17 Monitoring metabolic response using FDG PET-CT during targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer Woff, Erwin Hendlisz, Alain Garcia, Camilo Deleporte, Amelie Delaunoit, Thierry Maréchal, Raphaël Holbrechts, Stéphane Van den Eynde, Marc Demolin, Gauthier Vierasu, Irina Lhommel, Renaud Gauthier, Namur Guiot, Thomas Ameye, Lieveke Flamen, Patrick Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article INTRODUCTION: The introduction of targeted drugs has had a significant impact on the approach to assessing tumour response. These drugs often induce a rapid cytostatic effect associated with a less pronounced and slower tumoural volume reduction, thereby impairing the correlation between the absence of tumour shrinkage and the patient’s unlikelihood of benefit. The aim of the study was to assess the predictive value of early metabolic response (mR) evaluation after one cycle, and its interlesional heterogeneity to a later metabolic and morphological response assessment performed after three cycles in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with combined sorafenib and capecitabine. METHODS: This substudy was performed within the framework of a wider prospective multicenter study on the predictive value of early FDG PET-CT response assessment (SoMore study). A lesion-based response analysis was performed, including all measurable lesions identified on the baseline PET. On a per-patient basis, a descriptive 4-class response categorization was applied based upon the presence and proportion of non-responding lesions. For dichotomic response comparison, all patients with at least one resistant lesion were classified as non-responding. RESULTS: On baseline FDG PET-CT, 124 measurable “target” lesions were identified in 38 patients. Early mR assessments showed 18 patients (47 %) without treatment resistant lesions and 12 patients (32 %) with interlesional response heterogeneity. The NPV and PPV of early mR were 85 % (35/41) and 84 % (70/83), respectively, on a per-lesion basis and 95 % (19/20) and 72 % (13/18), respectively, on a dichotomized per-patient basis. CONCLUSIONS: Early mR assessment performed after one cycle of sorafenib-capecitabine in mCRC is highly predictive of non-response at a standard response assessment time. The high NPV (95 %) of early mR could be useful as the basis for early treatment discontinuation or adaptation to spare patients from exposure to non-effective drugs. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-04-12 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4969337/ /pubmed/27072811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3365-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Woff, Erwin Hendlisz, Alain Garcia, Camilo Deleporte, Amelie Delaunoit, Thierry Maréchal, Raphaël Holbrechts, Stéphane Van den Eynde, Marc Demolin, Gauthier Vierasu, Irina Lhommel, Renaud Gauthier, Namur Guiot, Thomas Ameye, Lieveke Flamen, Patrick Monitoring metabolic response using FDG PET-CT during targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer |
title | Monitoring metabolic response using FDG PET-CT during targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer |
title_full | Monitoring metabolic response using FDG PET-CT during targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer |
title_fullStr | Monitoring metabolic response using FDG PET-CT during targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Monitoring metabolic response using FDG PET-CT during targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer |
title_short | Monitoring metabolic response using FDG PET-CT during targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer |
title_sort | monitoring metabolic response using fdg pet-ct during targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4969337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27072811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3365-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wofferwin monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer AT hendliszalain monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer AT garciacamilo monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer AT deleporteamelie monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer AT delaunoitthierry monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer AT marechalraphael monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer AT holbrechtsstephane monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer AT vandeneyndemarc monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer AT demolingauthier monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer AT vierasuirina monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer AT lhommelrenaud monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer AT gauthiernamur monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer AT guiotthomas monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer AT ameyelieveke monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer AT flamenpatrick monitoringmetabolicresponseusingfdgpetctduringtargetedtherapyformetastaticcolorectalcancer |