Cargando…

The medial and lateral epicondyle as a reliable landmark for intra-operative joint line determination in revision knee arthroplasty

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to develop an accurate, reliable and easily applicable method for determining the anatomical location of the joint line during revision knee arthroplasty. METHODS: The transepicondylar width (TEW), the perpendicular distance between the medial and lateral ep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ozkurt, B., Sen, T., Cankaya, D., Kendir, S., Basarır, K., Tabak, Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4969630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27388715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.57.BJR-2016-0002.R1
_version_ 1782445810939592704
author Ozkurt, B.
Sen, T.
Cankaya, D.
Kendir, S.
Basarır, K.
Tabak, Y.
author_facet Ozkurt, B.
Sen, T.
Cankaya, D.
Kendir, S.
Basarır, K.
Tabak, Y.
author_sort Ozkurt, B.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to develop an accurate, reliable and easily applicable method for determining the anatomical location of the joint line during revision knee arthroplasty. METHODS: The transepicondylar width (TEW), the perpendicular distance between the medial and lateral epicondyles and the distal articular surfaces (DMAD, DLAD) and the distance between the medial and lateral epicondyles and the posterior articular surfaces (PMAD, DLAD) were measured in 40 knees from 20 formalin-fixed adult cadavers (11 male and nine female; mean age at death 56.9 years, sd 9.4; 34 to 69). The ratios of the DMAD, PMAD, DLAD and PLAD to TEW were calculated. RESULTS: The mean TEW, DMAD, PMAD, DLAD and PLAD were 82.76 mm (standard deviation (sd) 7.74), 28.95 mm (sd 3.3), 28.57 mm (sd 3), 23.97 mm (sd 3.27) and 24.42 mm (sd 3.14), respectively. The ratios between the TEW and the articular distances (DMAD/TEW, DLAD/TEW, PMAD/TEW and PLAD/TEW) were calculated and their means were 0.35 (sd 0.02), 0.34 (sd 0.02), 0.28 (sd 0.03) and 0.29 (sd 0.03), respectively. CONCLUSION: This method provides a simple, reproducible and reliable technique enabling accurate anatomical joint line restoration during revision total knee arthroplasty. Cite this article: B. Ozkurt, T. Sen, D. Cankaya, S. Kendir, K. Basarır, Y. Tabak. The medial and lateral epicondyle as a reliable landmark for intra-operative joint line determination in revision knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:280–286. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.57.BJR-2016-0002.R1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4969630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49696302016-08-23 The medial and lateral epicondyle as a reliable landmark for intra-operative joint line determination in revision knee arthroplasty Ozkurt, B. Sen, T. Cankaya, D. Kendir, S. Basarır, K. Tabak, Y. Bone Joint Res Knee OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to develop an accurate, reliable and easily applicable method for determining the anatomical location of the joint line during revision knee arthroplasty. METHODS: The transepicondylar width (TEW), the perpendicular distance between the medial and lateral epicondyles and the distal articular surfaces (DMAD, DLAD) and the distance between the medial and lateral epicondyles and the posterior articular surfaces (PMAD, DLAD) were measured in 40 knees from 20 formalin-fixed adult cadavers (11 male and nine female; mean age at death 56.9 years, sd 9.4; 34 to 69). The ratios of the DMAD, PMAD, DLAD and PLAD to TEW were calculated. RESULTS: The mean TEW, DMAD, PMAD, DLAD and PLAD were 82.76 mm (standard deviation (sd) 7.74), 28.95 mm (sd 3.3), 28.57 mm (sd 3), 23.97 mm (sd 3.27) and 24.42 mm (sd 3.14), respectively. The ratios between the TEW and the articular distances (DMAD/TEW, DLAD/TEW, PMAD/TEW and PLAD/TEW) were calculated and their means were 0.35 (sd 0.02), 0.34 (sd 0.02), 0.28 (sd 0.03) and 0.29 (sd 0.03), respectively. CONCLUSION: This method provides a simple, reproducible and reliable technique enabling accurate anatomical joint line restoration during revision total knee arthroplasty. Cite this article: B. Ozkurt, T. Sen, D. Cankaya, S. Kendir, K. Basarır, Y. Tabak. The medial and lateral epicondyle as a reliable landmark for intra-operative joint line determination in revision knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:280–286. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.57.BJR-2016-0002.R1. 2016-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4969630/ /pubmed/27388715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.57.BJR-2016-0002.R1 Text en © 2016 Ozkurt et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Knee
Ozkurt, B.
Sen, T.
Cankaya, D.
Kendir, S.
Basarır, K.
Tabak, Y.
The medial and lateral epicondyle as a reliable landmark for intra-operative joint line determination in revision knee arthroplasty
title The medial and lateral epicondyle as a reliable landmark for intra-operative joint line determination in revision knee arthroplasty
title_full The medial and lateral epicondyle as a reliable landmark for intra-operative joint line determination in revision knee arthroplasty
title_fullStr The medial and lateral epicondyle as a reliable landmark for intra-operative joint line determination in revision knee arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed The medial and lateral epicondyle as a reliable landmark for intra-operative joint line determination in revision knee arthroplasty
title_short The medial and lateral epicondyle as a reliable landmark for intra-operative joint line determination in revision knee arthroplasty
title_sort medial and lateral epicondyle as a reliable landmark for intra-operative joint line determination in revision knee arthroplasty
topic Knee
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4969630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27388715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.57.BJR-2016-0002.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT ozkurtb themedialandlateralepicondyleasareliablelandmarkforintraoperativejointlinedeterminationinrevisionkneearthroplasty
AT sent themedialandlateralepicondyleasareliablelandmarkforintraoperativejointlinedeterminationinrevisionkneearthroplasty
AT cankayad themedialandlateralepicondyleasareliablelandmarkforintraoperativejointlinedeterminationinrevisionkneearthroplasty
AT kendirs themedialandlateralepicondyleasareliablelandmarkforintraoperativejointlinedeterminationinrevisionkneearthroplasty
AT basarırk themedialandlateralepicondyleasareliablelandmarkforintraoperativejointlinedeterminationinrevisionkneearthroplasty
AT tabaky themedialandlateralepicondyleasareliablelandmarkforintraoperativejointlinedeterminationinrevisionkneearthroplasty
AT ozkurtb medialandlateralepicondyleasareliablelandmarkforintraoperativejointlinedeterminationinrevisionkneearthroplasty
AT sent medialandlateralepicondyleasareliablelandmarkforintraoperativejointlinedeterminationinrevisionkneearthroplasty
AT cankayad medialandlateralepicondyleasareliablelandmarkforintraoperativejointlinedeterminationinrevisionkneearthroplasty
AT kendirs medialandlateralepicondyleasareliablelandmarkforintraoperativejointlinedeterminationinrevisionkneearthroplasty
AT basarırk medialandlateralepicondyleasareliablelandmarkforintraoperativejointlinedeterminationinrevisionkneearthroplasty
AT tabaky medialandlateralepicondyleasareliablelandmarkforintraoperativejointlinedeterminationinrevisionkneearthroplasty