Cargando…
Utility of repeat cytological assessment of thyroid nodules initially classified as benign: clinical insights from multidisciplinary care in an Irish tertiary referral centre
BACKGROUND: Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is the tool of choice for evaluating thyroid nodules with the majority classified as benign following initial assessment. However, concern remains about false negative results and some guidelines have recommended routine repeat aspirates. We aimed to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4969652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27485324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-016-0125-7 |
_version_ | 1782445815572201472 |
---|---|
author | Glynn, Nigel Hannon, Mark J. Lewis, Sarah Hillery, Patrick Al-Mousa, Mohammed Hill, Arnold D. K. Keeling, Frank Morrin, Martina Thompson, Christopher J. Smith, Diarmuid Royston, Derval Leader, Mary Agha, Amar |
author_facet | Glynn, Nigel Hannon, Mark J. Lewis, Sarah Hillery, Patrick Al-Mousa, Mohammed Hill, Arnold D. K. Keeling, Frank Morrin, Martina Thompson, Christopher J. Smith, Diarmuid Royston, Derval Leader, Mary Agha, Amar |
author_sort | Glynn, Nigel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is the tool of choice for evaluating thyroid nodules with the majority classified as benign following initial assessment. However, concern remains about false negative results and some guidelines have recommended routine repeat aspirates. We aimed to assess the utility of routine repeat FNAB for nodules classified as benign on initial biopsy and to examine the impact of establishing a multidisciplinary team for the care of these patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 400 consecutive patients (413 nodules) who underwent FNAB of a thyroid nodule at our hospital between July 2008 and July 2011. Data recorded included demographic, clinical, histological and radiological variables. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty seven patients (89 %) were female. Median follow-up was 5.5 years. Two hundred and fifty eight (63 %) nodules were diagnosed as benign. The rate of routine repeat biopsy increased significantly over the time course of the study (p for trend = 0.012). Nine Thy 2 nodules were classified differently on the basis of routine repeat biopsy; one patient was classified as malignant on repeat biopsy and was diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Eight were classified as a follicular lesions on repeat biopsy—six diagnosed as benign following lobectomy; two declined lobectomy and were followed radiologically with no nodule size increase. CONCLUSIONS: The false negative rate of an initial benign cytology result, from a thyroid nodule aspirate, is low. In the setting of an experienced multidisciplinary thyroid team, routine repeat aspiration is not justified. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4969652 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49696522016-08-03 Utility of repeat cytological assessment of thyroid nodules initially classified as benign: clinical insights from multidisciplinary care in an Irish tertiary referral centre Glynn, Nigel Hannon, Mark J. Lewis, Sarah Hillery, Patrick Al-Mousa, Mohammed Hill, Arnold D. K. Keeling, Frank Morrin, Martina Thompson, Christopher J. Smith, Diarmuid Royston, Derval Leader, Mary Agha, Amar BMC Endocr Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is the tool of choice for evaluating thyroid nodules with the majority classified as benign following initial assessment. However, concern remains about false negative results and some guidelines have recommended routine repeat aspirates. We aimed to assess the utility of routine repeat FNAB for nodules classified as benign on initial biopsy and to examine the impact of establishing a multidisciplinary team for the care of these patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 400 consecutive patients (413 nodules) who underwent FNAB of a thyroid nodule at our hospital between July 2008 and July 2011. Data recorded included demographic, clinical, histological and radiological variables. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty seven patients (89 %) were female. Median follow-up was 5.5 years. Two hundred and fifty eight (63 %) nodules were diagnosed as benign. The rate of routine repeat biopsy increased significantly over the time course of the study (p for trend = 0.012). Nine Thy 2 nodules were classified differently on the basis of routine repeat biopsy; one patient was classified as malignant on repeat biopsy and was diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Eight were classified as a follicular lesions on repeat biopsy—six diagnosed as benign following lobectomy; two declined lobectomy and were followed radiologically with no nodule size increase. CONCLUSIONS: The false negative rate of an initial benign cytology result, from a thyroid nodule aspirate, is low. In the setting of an experienced multidisciplinary thyroid team, routine repeat aspiration is not justified. BioMed Central 2016-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4969652/ /pubmed/27485324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-016-0125-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Glynn, Nigel Hannon, Mark J. Lewis, Sarah Hillery, Patrick Al-Mousa, Mohammed Hill, Arnold D. K. Keeling, Frank Morrin, Martina Thompson, Christopher J. Smith, Diarmuid Royston, Derval Leader, Mary Agha, Amar Utility of repeat cytological assessment of thyroid nodules initially classified as benign: clinical insights from multidisciplinary care in an Irish tertiary referral centre |
title | Utility of repeat cytological assessment of thyroid nodules initially classified as benign: clinical insights from multidisciplinary care in an Irish tertiary referral centre |
title_full | Utility of repeat cytological assessment of thyroid nodules initially classified as benign: clinical insights from multidisciplinary care in an Irish tertiary referral centre |
title_fullStr | Utility of repeat cytological assessment of thyroid nodules initially classified as benign: clinical insights from multidisciplinary care in an Irish tertiary referral centre |
title_full_unstemmed | Utility of repeat cytological assessment of thyroid nodules initially classified as benign: clinical insights from multidisciplinary care in an Irish tertiary referral centre |
title_short | Utility of repeat cytological assessment of thyroid nodules initially classified as benign: clinical insights from multidisciplinary care in an Irish tertiary referral centre |
title_sort | utility of repeat cytological assessment of thyroid nodules initially classified as benign: clinical insights from multidisciplinary care in an irish tertiary referral centre |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4969652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27485324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-016-0125-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT glynnnigel utilityofrepeatcytologicalassessmentofthyroidnodulesinitiallyclassifiedasbenignclinicalinsightsfrommultidisciplinarycareinanirishtertiaryreferralcentre AT hannonmarkj utilityofrepeatcytologicalassessmentofthyroidnodulesinitiallyclassifiedasbenignclinicalinsightsfrommultidisciplinarycareinanirishtertiaryreferralcentre AT lewissarah utilityofrepeatcytologicalassessmentofthyroidnodulesinitiallyclassifiedasbenignclinicalinsightsfrommultidisciplinarycareinanirishtertiaryreferralcentre AT hillerypatrick utilityofrepeatcytologicalassessmentofthyroidnodulesinitiallyclassifiedasbenignclinicalinsightsfrommultidisciplinarycareinanirishtertiaryreferralcentre AT almousamohammed utilityofrepeatcytologicalassessmentofthyroidnodulesinitiallyclassifiedasbenignclinicalinsightsfrommultidisciplinarycareinanirishtertiaryreferralcentre AT hillarnolddk utilityofrepeatcytologicalassessmentofthyroidnodulesinitiallyclassifiedasbenignclinicalinsightsfrommultidisciplinarycareinanirishtertiaryreferralcentre AT keelingfrank utilityofrepeatcytologicalassessmentofthyroidnodulesinitiallyclassifiedasbenignclinicalinsightsfrommultidisciplinarycareinanirishtertiaryreferralcentre AT morrinmartina utilityofrepeatcytologicalassessmentofthyroidnodulesinitiallyclassifiedasbenignclinicalinsightsfrommultidisciplinarycareinanirishtertiaryreferralcentre AT thompsonchristopherj utilityofrepeatcytologicalassessmentofthyroidnodulesinitiallyclassifiedasbenignclinicalinsightsfrommultidisciplinarycareinanirishtertiaryreferralcentre AT smithdiarmuid utilityofrepeatcytologicalassessmentofthyroidnodulesinitiallyclassifiedasbenignclinicalinsightsfrommultidisciplinarycareinanirishtertiaryreferralcentre AT roystonderval utilityofrepeatcytologicalassessmentofthyroidnodulesinitiallyclassifiedasbenignclinicalinsightsfrommultidisciplinarycareinanirishtertiaryreferralcentre AT leadermary utilityofrepeatcytologicalassessmentofthyroidnodulesinitiallyclassifiedasbenignclinicalinsightsfrommultidisciplinarycareinanirishtertiaryreferralcentre AT aghaamar utilityofrepeatcytologicalassessmentofthyroidnodulesinitiallyclassifiedasbenignclinicalinsightsfrommultidisciplinarycareinanirishtertiaryreferralcentre |