Cargando…
Prehospital lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a pilot study
BACKGROUND: An improved prehospital diagnostic accuracy of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema could potentially improve initial treatment, triage, and outcome. A pilot study was conducted to assess the feasibility, time-use, and diagnostic accuracy of prehospital lung ultrasound (PLUS) for the diagnosis o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27480128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0288-2 |
_version_ | 1782445946610647040 |
---|---|
author | Laursen, Christian B. Hänselmann, Anja Posth, Stefan Mikkelsen, Søren Videbæk, Lars Berg, Henrik |
author_facet | Laursen, Christian B. Hänselmann, Anja Posth, Stefan Mikkelsen, Søren Videbæk, Lars Berg, Henrik |
author_sort | Laursen, Christian B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An improved prehospital diagnostic accuracy of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema could potentially improve initial treatment, triage, and outcome. A pilot study was conducted to assess the feasibility, time-use, and diagnostic accuracy of prehospital lung ultrasound (PLUS) for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in a prehospital setting. Patients were included if the physician based prehospital mobile emergency care unit was activated and one or more of the following two were present: respiratory rate >30/min., oxygen saturation <90 %. Exclusion criteria were: age <18 years, permanent mental disability or PLUS causing a delay in life-saving treatment or transportation. Following clinical assessment PLUS was performed and presence or absence of interstitial syndrome was registered. Audit by three physicians using predefined diagnostic criteria for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema was used as gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were included in the study. Feasibility of PLUS was 100 % and median time used was 3 min. The gold standard diagnosed 18 (45.0 %) patients with cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. The diagnostic accuracy of PLUS for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema was: sensitivity 94.4 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 72.7–99.9 %), specificity 77.3 % (95 % CI 54.6–92.2 %), positive predictive value 77.3 % (95 % CI 54.6–92.2 %), negative predictive value 94.4 % (95 % CI 72.7–99.9 %). DISCUSSION: The sensitivity of PLUS is high, making it a potential tool for ruling-out cardiogenic pulmonary. The observed specificity was lower than what has been described in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: Performed, as part of a physician based prehospital emergency service, PLUS seems fast and highly feasible in patients with respiratory failure. Due to its diagnostic accuracy, PLUS may have potential as a prehospital tool, especially to rule out cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4970268 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49702682016-08-03 Prehospital lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a pilot study Laursen, Christian B. Hänselmann, Anja Posth, Stefan Mikkelsen, Søren Videbæk, Lars Berg, Henrik Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: An improved prehospital diagnostic accuracy of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema could potentially improve initial treatment, triage, and outcome. A pilot study was conducted to assess the feasibility, time-use, and diagnostic accuracy of prehospital lung ultrasound (PLUS) for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in a prehospital setting. Patients were included if the physician based prehospital mobile emergency care unit was activated and one or more of the following two were present: respiratory rate >30/min., oxygen saturation <90 %. Exclusion criteria were: age <18 years, permanent mental disability or PLUS causing a delay in life-saving treatment or transportation. Following clinical assessment PLUS was performed and presence or absence of interstitial syndrome was registered. Audit by three physicians using predefined diagnostic criteria for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema was used as gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were included in the study. Feasibility of PLUS was 100 % and median time used was 3 min. The gold standard diagnosed 18 (45.0 %) patients with cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. The diagnostic accuracy of PLUS for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema was: sensitivity 94.4 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 72.7–99.9 %), specificity 77.3 % (95 % CI 54.6–92.2 %), positive predictive value 77.3 % (95 % CI 54.6–92.2 %), negative predictive value 94.4 % (95 % CI 72.7–99.9 %). DISCUSSION: The sensitivity of PLUS is high, making it a potential tool for ruling-out cardiogenic pulmonary. The observed specificity was lower than what has been described in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: Performed, as part of a physician based prehospital emergency service, PLUS seems fast and highly feasible in patients with respiratory failure. Due to its diagnostic accuracy, PLUS may have potential as a prehospital tool, especially to rule out cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. BioMed Central 2016-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4970268/ /pubmed/27480128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0288-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Laursen, Christian B. Hänselmann, Anja Posth, Stefan Mikkelsen, Søren Videbæk, Lars Berg, Henrik Prehospital lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a pilot study |
title | Prehospital lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a pilot study |
title_full | Prehospital lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a pilot study |
title_fullStr | Prehospital lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Prehospital lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a pilot study |
title_short | Prehospital lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a pilot study |
title_sort | prehospital lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a pilot study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27480128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0288-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laursenchristianb prehospitallungultrasoundforthediagnosisofcardiogenicpulmonaryoedemaapilotstudy AT hanselmannanja prehospitallungultrasoundforthediagnosisofcardiogenicpulmonaryoedemaapilotstudy AT posthstefan prehospitallungultrasoundforthediagnosisofcardiogenicpulmonaryoedemaapilotstudy AT mikkelsensøren prehospitallungultrasoundforthediagnosisofcardiogenicpulmonaryoedemaapilotstudy AT videbæklars prehospitallungultrasoundforthediagnosisofcardiogenicpulmonaryoedemaapilotstudy AT berghenrik prehospitallungultrasoundforthediagnosisofcardiogenicpulmonaryoedemaapilotstudy |