Cargando…

Prehospital lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: An improved prehospital diagnostic accuracy of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema could potentially improve initial treatment, triage, and outcome. A pilot study was conducted to assess the feasibility, time-use, and diagnostic accuracy of prehospital lung ultrasound (PLUS) for the diagnosis o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laursen, Christian B., Hänselmann, Anja, Posth, Stefan, Mikkelsen, Søren, Videbæk, Lars, Berg, Henrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27480128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0288-2
_version_ 1782445946610647040
author Laursen, Christian B.
Hänselmann, Anja
Posth, Stefan
Mikkelsen, Søren
Videbæk, Lars
Berg, Henrik
author_facet Laursen, Christian B.
Hänselmann, Anja
Posth, Stefan
Mikkelsen, Søren
Videbæk, Lars
Berg, Henrik
author_sort Laursen, Christian B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An improved prehospital diagnostic accuracy of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema could potentially improve initial treatment, triage, and outcome. A pilot study was conducted to assess the feasibility, time-use, and diagnostic accuracy of prehospital lung ultrasound (PLUS) for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in a prehospital setting. Patients were included if the physician based prehospital mobile emergency care unit was activated and one or more of the following two were present: respiratory rate >30/min., oxygen saturation <90 %. Exclusion criteria were: age <18 years, permanent mental disability or PLUS causing a delay in life-saving treatment or transportation. Following clinical assessment PLUS was performed and presence or absence of interstitial syndrome was registered. Audit by three physicians using predefined diagnostic criteria for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema was used as gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were included in the study. Feasibility of PLUS was 100 % and median time used was 3 min. The gold standard diagnosed 18 (45.0 %) patients with cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. The diagnostic accuracy of PLUS for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema was: sensitivity 94.4 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 72.7–99.9 %), specificity 77.3 % (95 % CI 54.6–92.2 %), positive predictive value 77.3 % (95 % CI 54.6–92.2 %), negative predictive value 94.4 % (95 % CI 72.7–99.9 %). DISCUSSION: The sensitivity of PLUS is high, making it a potential tool for ruling-out cardiogenic pulmonary. The observed specificity was lower than what has been described in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: Performed, as part of a physician based prehospital emergency service, PLUS seems fast and highly feasible in patients with respiratory failure. Due to its diagnostic accuracy, PLUS may have potential as a prehospital tool, especially to rule out cardiogenic pulmonary oedema.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4970268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49702682016-08-03 Prehospital lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a pilot study Laursen, Christian B. Hänselmann, Anja Posth, Stefan Mikkelsen, Søren Videbæk, Lars Berg, Henrik Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: An improved prehospital diagnostic accuracy of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema could potentially improve initial treatment, triage, and outcome. A pilot study was conducted to assess the feasibility, time-use, and diagnostic accuracy of prehospital lung ultrasound (PLUS) for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in a prehospital setting. Patients were included if the physician based prehospital mobile emergency care unit was activated and one or more of the following two were present: respiratory rate >30/min., oxygen saturation <90 %. Exclusion criteria were: age <18 years, permanent mental disability or PLUS causing a delay in life-saving treatment or transportation. Following clinical assessment PLUS was performed and presence or absence of interstitial syndrome was registered. Audit by three physicians using predefined diagnostic criteria for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema was used as gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were included in the study. Feasibility of PLUS was 100 % and median time used was 3 min. The gold standard diagnosed 18 (45.0 %) patients with cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. The diagnostic accuracy of PLUS for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema was: sensitivity 94.4 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 72.7–99.9 %), specificity 77.3 % (95 % CI 54.6–92.2 %), positive predictive value 77.3 % (95 % CI 54.6–92.2 %), negative predictive value 94.4 % (95 % CI 72.7–99.9 %). DISCUSSION: The sensitivity of PLUS is high, making it a potential tool for ruling-out cardiogenic pulmonary. The observed specificity was lower than what has been described in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: Performed, as part of a physician based prehospital emergency service, PLUS seems fast and highly feasible in patients with respiratory failure. Due to its diagnostic accuracy, PLUS may have potential as a prehospital tool, especially to rule out cardiogenic pulmonary oedema. BioMed Central 2016-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4970268/ /pubmed/27480128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0288-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Laursen, Christian B.
Hänselmann, Anja
Posth, Stefan
Mikkelsen, Søren
Videbæk, Lars
Berg, Henrik
Prehospital lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a pilot study
title Prehospital lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a pilot study
title_full Prehospital lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a pilot study
title_fullStr Prehospital lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Prehospital lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a pilot study
title_short Prehospital lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a pilot study
title_sort prehospital lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a pilot study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27480128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0288-2
work_keys_str_mv AT laursenchristianb prehospitallungultrasoundforthediagnosisofcardiogenicpulmonaryoedemaapilotstudy
AT hanselmannanja prehospitallungultrasoundforthediagnosisofcardiogenicpulmonaryoedemaapilotstudy
AT posthstefan prehospitallungultrasoundforthediagnosisofcardiogenicpulmonaryoedemaapilotstudy
AT mikkelsensøren prehospitallungultrasoundforthediagnosisofcardiogenicpulmonaryoedemaapilotstudy
AT videbæklars prehospitallungultrasoundforthediagnosisofcardiogenicpulmonaryoedemaapilotstudy
AT berghenrik prehospitallungultrasoundforthediagnosisofcardiogenicpulmonaryoedemaapilotstudy