Cargando…

Follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty

INTRODUCTION: The duration, methods and frequency of radiographic follow-up after pediatric pyeloplasty is not well-defined. We prospectively evaluated a cohort of children undergoing pyeloplasty to determine the method for follow-up. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2008, children undergoing pyeloplasty f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Manoj, Singh, Sanjeet Kumar, Arora, Sohrab, Mittal, Varun, Patidar, Nitesh, Sureka, Sanjoy Kumar, Ansari, M. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27555681
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.185090
_version_ 1782445968360210432
author Kumar, Manoj
Singh, Sanjeet Kumar
Arora, Sohrab
Mittal, Varun
Patidar, Nitesh
Sureka, Sanjoy Kumar
Ansari, M. S.
author_facet Kumar, Manoj
Singh, Sanjeet Kumar
Arora, Sohrab
Mittal, Varun
Patidar, Nitesh
Sureka, Sanjoy Kumar
Ansari, M. S.
author_sort Kumar, Manoj
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The duration, methods and frequency of radiographic follow-up after pediatric pyeloplasty is not well-defined. We prospectively evaluated a cohort of children undergoing pyeloplasty to determine the method for follow-up. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2008, children undergoing pyeloplasty for unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction were evaluated for this study. All patients were evaluated preoperatively with protocol ultrasound (USG) and diuretic renal scan (RS). On the basis of preoperative split renal function (SRF), these patients were divided into four groups – Group I: SRF > 40%, Group II: SRF 30–39%, Group III: SRF 20–29%, and Group IV: SRF 10–19%. In follow-up, USG and RS were done at 3 months and repeated at 6 months, 1 year, and then yearly after surgery for a minimum period of 5 years. Improvement, stability, or worsening of hydronephrosis was based on the changes in anteroposterior (AP) diameter of pelvis and caliectasis on USG. Absolute increase in split renal function (SRF) >5% was considered significant. Failure was defined as increase in AP diameter of pelvis and decrease in cortical thickness on 3 consecutive USG, t½ >20 min with obstructive drainage on RS and/or symptomatic patient. RESULTS: 145 children were included in the study. Their mean age was 3.26 years and mean follow-up was 7.5 years. Pre- and post-operative SRF remain unchanged within 5% range in 35 of 41 patients (85%) in Group I. While 9 of 20 patients (45%) in Group II, 23 of 50 patients (46%) in Group III, and 14 of 34 patients (41%) in Group IV exhibited changes >5% after surgery. 5 patients failed, 2 in Group III, and 3 in Group IV. None of the patients deteriorated in Group I and II. CONCLUSION: After pyeloplasty in children with a baseline split GFR >30%, if a diuretic renogram and USG performed 3 months postoperatively shows nonobstructive drainage with t½ <20 min and decreased hydronephrosis, no further follow-up is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4970394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49703942016-08-23 Follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty Kumar, Manoj Singh, Sanjeet Kumar Arora, Sohrab Mittal, Varun Patidar, Nitesh Sureka, Sanjoy Kumar Ansari, M. S. Indian J Urol Original Article INTRODUCTION: The duration, methods and frequency of radiographic follow-up after pediatric pyeloplasty is not well-defined. We prospectively evaluated a cohort of children undergoing pyeloplasty to determine the method for follow-up. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2008, children undergoing pyeloplasty for unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction were evaluated for this study. All patients were evaluated preoperatively with protocol ultrasound (USG) and diuretic renal scan (RS). On the basis of preoperative split renal function (SRF), these patients were divided into four groups – Group I: SRF > 40%, Group II: SRF 30–39%, Group III: SRF 20–29%, and Group IV: SRF 10–19%. In follow-up, USG and RS were done at 3 months and repeated at 6 months, 1 year, and then yearly after surgery for a minimum period of 5 years. Improvement, stability, or worsening of hydronephrosis was based on the changes in anteroposterior (AP) diameter of pelvis and caliectasis on USG. Absolute increase in split renal function (SRF) >5% was considered significant. Failure was defined as increase in AP diameter of pelvis and decrease in cortical thickness on 3 consecutive USG, t½ >20 min with obstructive drainage on RS and/or symptomatic patient. RESULTS: 145 children were included in the study. Their mean age was 3.26 years and mean follow-up was 7.5 years. Pre- and post-operative SRF remain unchanged within 5% range in 35 of 41 patients (85%) in Group I. While 9 of 20 patients (45%) in Group II, 23 of 50 patients (46%) in Group III, and 14 of 34 patients (41%) in Group IV exhibited changes >5% after surgery. 5 patients failed, 2 in Group III, and 3 in Group IV. None of the patients deteriorated in Group I and II. CONCLUSION: After pyeloplasty in children with a baseline split GFR >30%, if a diuretic renogram and USG performed 3 months postoperatively shows nonobstructive drainage with t½ <20 min and decreased hydronephrosis, no further follow-up is required. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4970394/ /pubmed/27555681 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.185090 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kumar, Manoj
Singh, Sanjeet Kumar
Arora, Sohrab
Mittal, Varun
Patidar, Nitesh
Sureka, Sanjoy Kumar
Ansari, M. S.
Follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty
title Follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty
title_full Follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty
title_fullStr Follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty
title_full_unstemmed Follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty
title_short Follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty
title_sort follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27555681
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.185090
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarmanoj followupimagingafterpediatricpyeloplasty
AT singhsanjeetkumar followupimagingafterpediatricpyeloplasty
AT arorasohrab followupimagingafterpediatricpyeloplasty
AT mittalvarun followupimagingafterpediatricpyeloplasty
AT patidarnitesh followupimagingafterpediatricpyeloplasty
AT surekasanjoykumar followupimagingafterpediatricpyeloplasty
AT ansarims followupimagingafterpediatricpyeloplasty