Cargando…
Follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty
INTRODUCTION: The duration, methods and frequency of radiographic follow-up after pediatric pyeloplasty is not well-defined. We prospectively evaluated a cohort of children undergoing pyeloplasty to determine the method for follow-up. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2008, children undergoing pyeloplasty f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27555681 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.185090 |
_version_ | 1782445968360210432 |
---|---|
author | Kumar, Manoj Singh, Sanjeet Kumar Arora, Sohrab Mittal, Varun Patidar, Nitesh Sureka, Sanjoy Kumar Ansari, M. S. |
author_facet | Kumar, Manoj Singh, Sanjeet Kumar Arora, Sohrab Mittal, Varun Patidar, Nitesh Sureka, Sanjoy Kumar Ansari, M. S. |
author_sort | Kumar, Manoj |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The duration, methods and frequency of radiographic follow-up after pediatric pyeloplasty is not well-defined. We prospectively evaluated a cohort of children undergoing pyeloplasty to determine the method for follow-up. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2008, children undergoing pyeloplasty for unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction were evaluated for this study. All patients were evaluated preoperatively with protocol ultrasound (USG) and diuretic renal scan (RS). On the basis of preoperative split renal function (SRF), these patients were divided into four groups – Group I: SRF > 40%, Group II: SRF 30–39%, Group III: SRF 20–29%, and Group IV: SRF 10–19%. In follow-up, USG and RS were done at 3 months and repeated at 6 months, 1 year, and then yearly after surgery for a minimum period of 5 years. Improvement, stability, or worsening of hydronephrosis was based on the changes in anteroposterior (AP) diameter of pelvis and caliectasis on USG. Absolute increase in split renal function (SRF) >5% was considered significant. Failure was defined as increase in AP diameter of pelvis and decrease in cortical thickness on 3 consecutive USG, t½ >20 min with obstructive drainage on RS and/or symptomatic patient. RESULTS: 145 children were included in the study. Their mean age was 3.26 years and mean follow-up was 7.5 years. Pre- and post-operative SRF remain unchanged within 5% range in 35 of 41 patients (85%) in Group I. While 9 of 20 patients (45%) in Group II, 23 of 50 patients (46%) in Group III, and 14 of 34 patients (41%) in Group IV exhibited changes >5% after surgery. 5 patients failed, 2 in Group III, and 3 in Group IV. None of the patients deteriorated in Group I and II. CONCLUSION: After pyeloplasty in children with a baseline split GFR >30%, if a diuretic renogram and USG performed 3 months postoperatively shows nonobstructive drainage with t½ <20 min and decreased hydronephrosis, no further follow-up is required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4970394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49703942016-08-23 Follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty Kumar, Manoj Singh, Sanjeet Kumar Arora, Sohrab Mittal, Varun Patidar, Nitesh Sureka, Sanjoy Kumar Ansari, M. S. Indian J Urol Original Article INTRODUCTION: The duration, methods and frequency of radiographic follow-up after pediatric pyeloplasty is not well-defined. We prospectively evaluated a cohort of children undergoing pyeloplasty to determine the method for follow-up. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2008, children undergoing pyeloplasty for unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction were evaluated for this study. All patients were evaluated preoperatively with protocol ultrasound (USG) and diuretic renal scan (RS). On the basis of preoperative split renal function (SRF), these patients were divided into four groups – Group I: SRF > 40%, Group II: SRF 30–39%, Group III: SRF 20–29%, and Group IV: SRF 10–19%. In follow-up, USG and RS were done at 3 months and repeated at 6 months, 1 year, and then yearly after surgery for a minimum period of 5 years. Improvement, stability, or worsening of hydronephrosis was based on the changes in anteroposterior (AP) diameter of pelvis and caliectasis on USG. Absolute increase in split renal function (SRF) >5% was considered significant. Failure was defined as increase in AP diameter of pelvis and decrease in cortical thickness on 3 consecutive USG, t½ >20 min with obstructive drainage on RS and/or symptomatic patient. RESULTS: 145 children were included in the study. Their mean age was 3.26 years and mean follow-up was 7.5 years. Pre- and post-operative SRF remain unchanged within 5% range in 35 of 41 patients (85%) in Group I. While 9 of 20 patients (45%) in Group II, 23 of 50 patients (46%) in Group III, and 14 of 34 patients (41%) in Group IV exhibited changes >5% after surgery. 5 patients failed, 2 in Group III, and 3 in Group IV. None of the patients deteriorated in Group I and II. CONCLUSION: After pyeloplasty in children with a baseline split GFR >30%, if a diuretic renogram and USG performed 3 months postoperatively shows nonobstructive drainage with t½ <20 min and decreased hydronephrosis, no further follow-up is required. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4970394/ /pubmed/27555681 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.185090 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kumar, Manoj Singh, Sanjeet Kumar Arora, Sohrab Mittal, Varun Patidar, Nitesh Sureka, Sanjoy Kumar Ansari, M. S. Follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty |
title | Follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty |
title_full | Follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty |
title_fullStr | Follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty |
title_short | Follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty |
title_sort | follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27555681 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.185090 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumarmanoj followupimagingafterpediatricpyeloplasty AT singhsanjeetkumar followupimagingafterpediatricpyeloplasty AT arorasohrab followupimagingafterpediatricpyeloplasty AT mittalvarun followupimagingafterpediatricpyeloplasty AT patidarnitesh followupimagingafterpediatricpyeloplasty AT surekasanjoykumar followupimagingafterpediatricpyeloplasty AT ansarims followupimagingafterpediatricpyeloplasty |