Cargando…
Assessing harmful effects in systematic Reviews
BACKGROUND: Balanced decisions about health care interventions require reliable evidence on harms as well as benefits. Most systematic reviews focus on efficacy and randomised trials, for which the methodology is well established. Methods to systematically review harmful effects are less well develo...
Autores principales: | McIntosh, Heather M, Woolacott, Nerys F, Bagnall, Anne-Marie |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC497041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15260887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-19 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Strimvelis(®) for Treating Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Caused by Adenosine Deaminase Deficiency: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Highly Specialised Technology Evaluation
por: South, Emily, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Innovative regenerative medicines in the EU: a better future in evidence?
por: Corbett, Mark S., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions
por: Golder, Su, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Thigh length versus knee length antiembolism stockings for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in postoperative surgical patients; a systematic review and network meta-analysis
por: Wade, Ros, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effects
por: Golder, Su, et al.
Publicado: (2006)